You could make $5,000,000 dollars.

If you had not been trying to discredit and instead been paying attention you would know how they proved the machines in Messa county Colorado were intact on the internet. They have a forensic copy of the drive of a voting machine and it shows the machine was communicating over the internet, Formica copies can be used in court as evidence

Can you repeat that in a way that makes actual sense?
What is 'intact on the internet'?
What are "formica copies?"

If you are referring to what I think you are the log files on the copy of the drive only shows that a service started. It doesn't show communication or even if a connection was made. All services scheduled on startup start. I can turn on a computer that is not connected to anything and get the same log files saying the SFTP service started. It simply means the service is now available.
 
Antrum country opened a Dominion machine up and photographed a wireless card that was in the machine

The country of Antrum? I don't think it matters what happened in other countries.

If a wireless card is in a machine it doesn't mean it was connected. The thing about network services is they have to be specifically started and then the network password has to be submitted to connect to the network. If I walk into a coffee shop with my laptop which has a wireless card, it doesn't connect to the coffee shop network when I turn on the computer.

By the way.. this is from a court submission in a lawsuit

https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/ex_5-10.pdf
The ESS Model DS200 was found to have an internal wireless card, that has a private network address
that was designed to communicate with an ES&S Primary Host Server. These devices and servers are
ostensibly designed to operate on a virtual private network (VPN) that does not allow routing to the
Internet.
While each of the devices do have private network Internet Protocol (IP) addresses, testing
revealed that the SIM card used for the DS200 could be utilized in a generic device 4G wireless device
and allow for access to the same access point name (APN). There is substantial risk to the ES&S APN
connected machines from malicious actors that have access to any SIM card with pre-programmed
access to the APN.

There is no evidence of connection to the internet. The card only has access to a local network that does not allow routing to the internet.

The problem you have EL, is that facts keep shooting down your suspicions. And that is all you have, suspicions with no facts.

The voting machines have a wireless card that connects to the Host server. None of them are connected to the internet. They simply can talk to each other.
 
What evidence do you have that the voting machines were on the internet?

If Trump paid his taxes why is he afraid of turning over his tax returns?

The problem is that in both cases, there is so much information that has nothing to do with the original question that the person getting the router or the tax returns would have access to. There is no reason to turn them over unless there is actual evidence of what you are claiming and not just a suspicion.
They have found a ton of problems in Maricopa county so demanding a COURT ORDERED SUBPOENA is a reason.
 
The country of Antrum? I don't think it matters what happened in other countries.
Fat thumbs and a small thumbs. But its county not country if you are too stupid to figure it out.

If a wireless card is in a machine it doesn't mean it was connected. The thing about network services is they have to be specifically started and then the network password has to be submitted to connect to the network. If I walk into a coffee shop with my laptop which has a wireless card, it doesn't connect to the coffee shop network when I turn on the computer.

By the way.. this is from a court submission in a lawsuit

https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/ex_5-10.pdf


There is no evidence of connection to the internet. The card only has access to a local network that does not allow routing to the internet.

The problem you have EL, is that facts keep shooting down your suspicions. And that is all you have, suspicions with no facts.

The voting machines have a wireless card that connects to the Host server. None of them are connected to the internet. They simply can talk to each other.
They have the communications the wireless card made. They had a wireless networked voting system set up in a room next to the auditorium. They had two attendees that hacked into it from the auditorium in 5 minutes using their cellphones.. Before the election several Democrat politicians said the election machines could be hacked. Like K. Harris , Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar
 
Last edited:
They have found a ton of problems in Maricopa county so demanding a COURT ORDERED SUBPOENA is a reason.

Really? Please cite the exact problems they found in Maricopa county with evidence to support your claim.

Using sharpies is not a problem. Because someone complains they had to stand 6 feet way from poll workers is not a problem. You need to provide real evidence of something that violated election law or rules.

It's interesting that Cyber Ninjas and the Republicans are fighting to not turn over documents under a FIO request about the audit but you are OK with that.
 
Why does that guy look like this?

8ZIlEJ7.jpg
 
Fat thumbs and a small thumbs. But its county not country if you are too stupid to figure it out.
It seems you are too stupid to understand sarcasm. Somehow I am not surprised.


They have the communications the wireless card made. They had a wireless networked voting system set up in a room next to the auditorium. They had two attendees that hacked into it from the auditorium in 5 minutes using their cellphones.. Before the election several Democrat politicians said the election machines could be hacked.

Who has those communications? You do realize it is a Federal and a State crime to hack into such a network and download information.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030
If you are aware of such an act happening and who did it and you don't report it you could be guilty of acting as an accessory.
 
Really? Please cite the exact problems they found in Maricopa county with evidence to support your claim.

Using sharpies is not a problem. Because someone complains they had to stand 6 feet way from poll workers is not a problem. You need to provide real evidence of something that violated election law or rules.

It's interesting that Cyber Ninjas and the Republicans are fighting to not turn over documents under a FIO request about the audit but you are OK with that.
They have people that were not on the voter registration database before the election. They have 160K plus ballots that were printed on paper that the county says it did not use. They have mail in ballots that there is no record of the county sending out. There are other issues too.
 
It seems you are too stupid to understand sarcasm. Somehow I am not surprised.




Who has those communications? You do realize it is a Federal and a State crime to hack into such a network and download information.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030
If you are aware of such an act happening and who did it and you don't report it you could be guilty of acting as an accessory.
They didn't hack it the county clerk gave it to them. Go ahead and report them and see what happens. :laugh:
 
Back
Top