She was just joking. She admitted that. Apparently she knows she’s FOS.
50 years of failed eco predictions
- Thread starter tsuke
- Start date
She was just joking. She admitted that. Apparently she knows she’s FOS.
I knew what she meant. It's the retards who didn't. Sad that she had to explain what was so obvious.
She was referring to the IPCC report.
The emissivity constant doesn't change the fact that radiation is watts per meter squared and can only occur on the surface of any mass.
Since I didn't compare two systems your claim of a fallacy is itself a fallacy fallacy.
A fallacy fallacy occurs when someone simply claims a fallacy in order to avoid addressing the statement.
I am merely pointing out that S-B can only apply to the surface of the mass being referenced. If you break that mass up into parts then S-B can only be applied to surface of each of the parts. To fail to understand that is to fail to understand the most basic principle of the Stefan-Boltzmann law. Radiation can only occur at the surface of the object.
Of course I am arguing the temperature at the surface, dumbass. The temperature at the surface can increase if the radiation it receives increases. The radiation the earth's surface receives increases if the atmosphere radiates more IR. The atmosphere radiates more IR if it absorbs more IR.
It is a branch of mathematics that is taught. Since most people conduct statistical calculations based on how they were taught, it is reasonable to request you to show us when anyone taught that the calculations require published numbers before they can be performed. Your failure to support your claim would show it is bullshit.
ROFLMAO. You deserve mockery for your ignorance.
My only prediction is that you will make more ignorant comments. Other than that, feel free to point out where I predicted anything. (You will notice, you deserve mockery again.)
Your failure to look at the data doesn't make it biased or insufficient. It only points to you being unable to perform any of the work you attempt to ridicule.
Your failure to read the method which clearly lists the margin of error doesn't make me illiterate. It might make you illiterate if the reason you don't read the literature is because you can't read. Have you read Hansen et al's paper from 1987? Would you care to claim there is no listed margin of error anywhere in the paper?
Clearly you haven't or you wouldn't claim there is no margin of error listed.
Denial. It seems you think it works.
Fallacy fallacy.
Contradictory statement that shows you don't know what you are talking about. If one is collecting the high temperature for the day only an idiot would restrict their temperature reading to a specific time during the day.
fallacy fallacy. Denial of facts.
fallacy fallacy.
No evidence of you actually performing said work since you make claims that are clearly contradicted by published papers. Please provide supporting evidence.
Temperature readings are not random numbers. Any claim they are random shows you are simply throwing out bullshit hoping you won't be called on it.
Repeated fallacy fallacy on your part throughout all your posts.
You have failed to address the fact that your argument is complete nonsense and flies in the face of the math.
I wonder why casino's don't allow card counters if there is way to predict with probability math.
Old Trapper
Verified User
You really needed to say such bull sh*t since it is your kind that are causing others to die, and covid is not the only way you are doing so. One can only hope Karma will catch up to you.
The predictions are coming true as we read now. There are arid conditions around the globe. There are forest fires, where they were once rare. The water levels are rising as island states are sinking and the people have to move out. https://www.earthday.org/5-terrifying-climate-change-facts-scare-halloween/
The 20 highest recorded temperatures for the globe have happened in the last 22 years.
The 20 highest recorded temperatures for the globe have happened in the last 22 years.
And there are many more inside dwelling assholes like yourself who are incapable of thinking for themselves and realizing this is nothing new. Fucking idiot.
proven correct? Gore said by 2000 florida and much of the ease coast would be under water, duh, its not. He also said that all polar ice would be gone, duh, its not.
And Gore still owns waterfront property. The Obama's bought some quite recently.
And you hope they are proven correct.
what it shows is that they don't believe their own bullshit.
Um you didn't get the joke. Think about it for a minute.
And you hope they are proven correct.
They are not correct. They KNOW none of this is correct. You democrats should be questioning this shit.
Um think about it. About what I said.
I got it, it wasn't funny.
If I read it correctly you said I hope they are correct about climate change. They are not obviously. Or just really fucking stupid.
So you don't find it funny that they will get what they deserve?
They go underwater.