No, the people will dump all the other plans when they see what government health care offers.
But not to worry. There will always be a doctor available to take your money.
Really? How so? Please explain.It's not just a matter of knowing how to spell a word. One has to know it's proper meaning and place. Unfortunately, that's where you fail, and miserably.
It is impossible to compete with the plan the government runs. So this is a path to single payer totalitarianism. And there won't always be a doctor when the bureaucrats start rationing care, an inevitability.
AssHat, there is no need to worry. Millions and millions of people, all over the world in all different countries, have chosen government medical and not one single country wants to change back.
Really? How so? Please explain.
The use of the word "consumer" when talking about medical care. And competition.
Illness is not a business. A healthy population is vital to national security.
If there was a biological attack do we want people walking around spreading infection because they can't afford a doctor's visit?
And then there's people spreading STDs. Imagine how universal medical care could help bring that under better control.
And then there's productivity. Healthy people are much more productive.
There isn't any logical argument against universal medical care. None at all.
Countries are not thinking entities with opinions. maybe you mean the leadership is unwilling to release control over life and death of it's citzentry. i think that's what you mean.
Don't you worry, clear thinking individuals such as myself will save you from your own idiotic ideas.
Have you nothing better to do than critique my interchanging the word "countries" for "peoples"?
As I stated before find ONE link showing people or politicians demonstrating/campaigning for a return to the "Pay or Suffer" system.
Google, my man. Google. Just show me ONE link. Just ONE.
Talk about idiotic ideas. Every people/country that has instituted universal medical has never, ever changed back. NEVER. Do you understand that?
No peoples have ever demonstrated for a return to a "Pay or Suffer" system. NOT ONE.
I'll slide this past you one more time. Not one peoples/country has reverted to a "Pay or Suffer" system. NOT ONE.
Now do you get it? Is there anything you don't understand?
No peoples, no politicians, NOBODY advocates changing back except those who want to make money off of people's illnesses and misery. Surely you're not one of them, are you?
Of course there is. Without competition, buraucracies become less efficient, and the people are served less.
you are completely ignorant of actual reality.
Then maybe we should have another military. You know, one to compete with the one we already have.
Now there's a Repub's dream! Who can blow up more things the quickest.
One military could take on, say, Iran and the other, say, Syria or North Korea.
Money could be raised by placing bets. The Military Lottery.
You're a deep thinker, AssHat.![]()
Sure, people denied treatment, or made to wait months for crucial surgery just love the plan.
Peoples?
LOL. You're a joke.
At least the people can afford to get in line.
you're a dumb cunt.
And you're....and you're.......just a funny guy.
Anyway, a medical plan will pass with or without the co-operation of the "money changers" and the world will unfold the way it should.
One day you'll see the light.
Why would she/he? Why?
Tom is just jealous because I think you are a cutie, despite your liberal ways. He, on the other hand, is just a stuffy, old humorless Brit.
No, the problem is that sophisticated Brit humor goes over the average conservative's pointy little head.![]()
In the UK we have any number of private healthcare plans which operate in tandem with the NHS. I am in one of these myself.
http://www.axappphealthcare.co.uk/
It seems like in France Dr's in trainings tuition is paid for by the govt?
so even poorer people can become Dr's?