Trump killed Ashli Babbit?

Do you know what "circumstantial evidence" is?

Because there was nothing "circumstantial" about what Trump did on and before 1/6 to lead an insurrection.

Describe how you think it's "circumstantial", because that's a bizarre thing to say about this:


You say this, but it's not true.

YOU THINK you know how the law works, and you lent yourself that credibility, but you're not a lawyer, so you don't have that credibility nor do you have the credibility to declare that you know "how the law works".

you say all this and yet you still don't understand how things work, whether it's the law, or government, or military, or whatever...............but like most other egotistical and bigoted liberals, you're stuck on the false notion that you DO know these things...........what's hilarious is you ignore anything that proves you wrong..........anyway, i've told you what you don't know and why you don't know it..........you just keep doing you and i'll keep laughing at you
 
Babbit would be at home listening to Fox and screaming at the TV if Trump did not organize an insurrection. He holds the responsibility for whatever happened to those people.
 
you say all this and yet you still don't understand how things work, whether it's the law, or government, or military, or whatever

You got out over your skis on the whole "circumstantial" thing, and now you're backpedaling.

What was circumstantial about 1/6? I don't understand what you're talking about, and I don't think you understand it either.


but like most other egotistical and bigoted liberals, you're stuck on the false notion that you DO know these things

So that's a lot of words to say "I was talking out of my ass earlier".


what's hilarious is you ignore anything that proves you wrong..........anyway, i've told you what you don't know and why you don't know it..........you just keep doing you and i'll keep laughing at you

Your declaration isn't proof of anything...you have to support your arguments with evidence...like the argument that the 1/6 insurrection was "circumstantial".

I don't know what you mean by that and I don't think you know what you mean either.

I think you just threw that word out there to try and make yourself look smarter or more informed, and you've bristled at the attempt to get you to clarify what the fuck you meant.
 
You got out over your skis on the whole "circumstantial" thing, and now you're backpedaling.

What was circumstantial about 1/6? I don't understand what you're talking about, and I don't think you understand it either.

So that's a lot of words to say "I was talking out of my ass earlier".

Your declaration isn't proof of anything...you have to support your arguments with evidence...like the argument that the 1/6 insurrection was "circumstantial".

I don't know what you mean by that and I don't think you know what you mean either.

I think you just threw that word out there to try and make yourself look smarter or more informed, and you've bristled at the attempt to get you to clarify what the fuck you meant.

"circumstantial" - That's a riot. He thinks he knows the law but fails miserably.

He's trying to "politicize" and "weaponize" the Capitol Insurrection. Two favorite words of the Radical Right Wing media that apply nicely here.
 
If I were in the exact same circumstances as trump, at that particular time and place, i'd laugh my ass off at any prosecutor who thought they could bring a case with nothing but circumstantial evidence.............

but then I know how the law works and you do not.

Dude, Trump called them all together on 1/6, filled them full of "STOPtheSTEAL" bullshit and then launched them towards Congress. That's more than circumstantial..

OTOH, I doubt Trump will ever face criminal charges for his actions as President. The best hope America has for Trump to face justice** is if or when militia members confront Trump about his betrayal of them.

wXeuW7U.jpg

.
.
.
.

**Besides God. We can all pray that happens sooner rather than later...
2z684t.jpg
 
What a load!

If you and Trump hadn't lied about the election being stolen for three months, the soft headed Babbitt would never have gone to DC, would have never tried to break into the Capitol, and would have never been shot and killed for it.

She died because of you, and she died for your lies.
 
he didn't organize it anymore that Waters, Pelosi, and Harris organized BLM

Do you really believe that? Then your posts cannot be trusted. This was a Trump creation from the beginning. If you were not in a coma, you would have noticed that he held a rally down the street from the capital bldg while they were recounting the electoral ballots. Was that a cosmic coincidence? Then he had speakers who roused the people to violence. One after another they used violent acts in response for the election "theft'.
Mo Brooks is trying to disavow what he said in his speech. So will the others before it is done. Brooks said it was time to kick some ass and take names. We all heard read what was said. You cannot remake the truth , even though you are a Trumpy, and create your own reality.
 
Do you really believe that? Then your posts cannot be trusted. This was a Trump creation from the beginning. If you were not in a coma, you would have noticed that he held a rally down the street from the capital bldg while they were recounting the electoral ballots. Was that a cosmic coincidence? Then he had speakers who roused the people to violence. One after another they used violent acts in response for the election "theft'.
Mo Brooks is trying to disavow what he said in his speech. So will the others before it is done. Brooks said it was time to kick some ass and take names. We all heard read what was said. You cannot remake the truth , even though you are a Trumpy, and create your own reality.

he did not organize it, after BLM and Antifa got away with the bullshit they did from closing down highways and cities to assaulting innocent citizens, even the dumbest motherfucker on the face of the earth could have predicted this especially when people that participated in both were identified
 
Do you really believe that? Then your posts cannot be trusted. This was a Trump creation from the beginning. If you were not in a coma, you would have noticed that he held a rally down the street from the capital bldg while they were recounting the electoral ballots. Was that a cosmic coincidence? Then he had speakers who roused the people to violence. One after another they used violent acts in response for the election "theft'.
Mo Brooks is trying to disavow what he said in his speech. So will the others before it is done. Brooks said it was time to kick some ass and take names. We all heard read what was said. You cannot remake the truth , even though you are a Trumpy, and create your own reality.

Yes, they can't remake the truth but they can sure as hell try to change public perception of the truth. And that's what they're desperately trying to do, even though it has little chance of succeeding.
 
he did not organize it, after BLM and Antifa got away with the bullshit they did from closing down highways and cities to assaulting innocent citizens, even the dumbest motherfucker on the face of the earth could have predicted this especially when people that participated in both were identified

He organized it. He set the time and location. He selected the speakers. All speakers understood the messaging. This is not about BLM. Try and be honest. This is so clear.
 
He organized it. He set the time and location. He selected the speakers. All speakers understood the messaging. This is not about BLM. Try and be honest. This is so clear.

no this is the leftwing nuts going after Trump for saying less than Pelosi, Waters, and Harris have in the past and lets not forget BLM and antifa setting DC on fire just months before that
 
no this is the leftwing nuts going after Trump for saying less than Pelosi, Waters, and Harris have in the past and lets not forget BLM and antifa setting DC on fire just months before that

So are you unable to understand a topic and follow it. This is about the Trump insurrection. We have had tons of threads about BLM. This is not one. Remember the Alamo. Remember the Maine.
 
So are you unable to understand a topic and follow it. This is about the Trump insurrection. We have had tons of threads about BLM. This is not one. Remember the Alamo. Remember the Maine.

are too fucking stupid to see that what you are accusing Trump of has already been done by your ilk, I guess you are
 
are too fucking stupid to see that what you are accusing Trump of has already been done by your ilk, I guess you are

That of course is wrong again. But what does what someone else have to do with what you did. Do you think when they take trump to court, he will win the case by making claims about BLM? This is a fundamental debate and you do not understand how it works.
They are not related.
 
That of course is wrong again. But what does what someone else have to do with what you did. Do you think when they take trump to court, he will win the case by making claims about BLM? This is a fundamental debate and you do not understand how it works.
They are not related.

Members of Congress and VP actions will be seen as precedence thus evidence giving reasonable doubt to any juror
 
Back
Top