Possible Identity Of Ashli Babbitt Killer As Lt. Mike Byrd

I couldn't tell you, people get shot assaulting police in any other instance.

The police would have been right too.

The only thing that comes to mind is race.

If those traitors would have been black, I believe it would have been a bloodbath.

talk about mixed messages.......if it was right to shoot the rioters, why do you say it would have been a bad thing if someone had shot a black rioter?......
 
sad you hope for Americans to be killed...

When they're traitors like Babbitt, your daddy and the other Qless idiots, that's not sad.

No worries, son. Everyone knows you'll never be in danger. You're all talk. Just a spineless little creature living like a mushroom in your parent's basement.
 
sad you hope for Americans to be killed...

Son, you're the one advocating murdering American cops. I'm only advocating that all domestic terrorists who are attacking Americans be dealt with in a firm manner.

You are the criminal advocating violence against Americans. I'm fine with the FBI sorting it out.

Byrd better have eyes in the back of his head...

THAT CAPITOL PIG NEEDS TO ANSWER FOR SHOOTING AN UNARMED WOMAN
fuck you bitch... guess you are ok with pig cops shooting Americans

FWIW, I think you are a harmless cuck and that the FBI will draw the same conclusion. What they think of your daddy and friends is a different matter. Do you think they'd be mad at you because you drew the FBI's attention on a public forum?
 
The senseless shooting of just ONE individual by the cop firing only ONE round.

Why are none of you answering the question? What difference does it make whether the officer used one round or more than one round?
 
Forgive me but I thought the cops were supposed to only shoot you for what you do not for the actions of others. BABBITT was UNARMED she wasn't a threat to anyone.


I'll bet you think you can only get arrested for what you do even if you are just driving the car the guy that robbed the bank. Armchair quarterbacking isn't allowed when deciding if an officer perceived a threat.

Thanks for playing "ExpressLane is an idiot!!" You continue to shine at this.
 
There were more than just one threat, stupid fuck.

What the fuck does that even mean? What was more than one threat? Where? When? What in the actual fuck does one bullet versus more than one bullet have to do with anything, you daughter fucking pig slut?
 
Poor Richard Saunders======> :legion:

Officer X should have stood in front of the doors before they broke them and pointed his weapon at the most aggressive member of the crowd. That would have backed him down. But officer X hide in a doorway then shot a tiny woman that probably didn't even see him.

That's your explanation of how the other officers were in the line of fire?

You are really good at playing the game - "ExpressLane is an Idiot!!"
 
There were more than just one threat, stupid fuck.
Why are none of you answering the question? What difference does it make whether the officer used one round or more than one round?

Forget RB. He's a pro-Trumper cuck.

The officer fires one round and the attack on the barrier stops. If the Insurrectionists had continued, is there any doubt that several officers would have opened up?

I'm really curious about who that officer was defending behind that final barrier. Pence? Cruz? McConnell? Who was back there? Is that why the Republicans are against an investigation revealing the truth? The irony Trump's terrorist was shot protecting Pence or some other Republicans?

FWIW, if Trump's Criminals, Cucks and Cunts murder the officer who shot Babbitt, that officer will not only become a martyr, but it would force out the truth of who was behind that wall since I'm sure the officer's wife knows. LOL
 
I have taken care of GSW victims that have bullets hit and exit in very wide angles. Anyone behind he could have been hit.

There is this silly little thing called physics. Bullets can change course if they hit something but that also slows the bullet down. In order for a bullet to make a 90 degree turn it would need to hit something pretty solid which would drastically slow it down. The only thing behind her was the wall based on the location of the officer and where she was. There isn't enough soft tissue and bone in the neck to get a bullet to change directions like you claim could have happened.

But thanks for continuing to play "ExpressLane is an idiot!!"
 
Back
Top