I suspect she can't because she doesn't want to, Tom.
"52 ballots from a 2 bedroom home" - Former AZ Secretary of State
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
I suspect she can't because she doesn't want to, Tom.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
Why don't you worry about what goes on in the UK.
Yes, it absolutely is about the Electoral College. Together AZ, GA and Wl have 37 EC votes. If those 37 votes were taken from Biden he would have ended up with 269 EC votes and you need 270 to win.
Wrong, dummy. If trump had gotten those 43K votes he would have gotten the electoral votes from those states.
Who told you that?
OMG
"hey i got a ton of ballots I just found.they arent postmarked - but so what?"
Help me out here, I'm looking for a site that claims PA found and counted a ton of ballots without postmarks.
A deadlocked Supreme Court on Monday let stand a lower-court ruling that requires Pennsylvania election officials to count absentee ballots received within three days after Election Day, Nov. 3, even if they are not postmarked. In two brief orders issued shortly after 7 p.m., the justices denied, without explanation, a request by Republicans to put the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling on hold. Four justices – Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh – indicated that they would have granted the Republicans’ request.
The order came in a lawsuit filed by the Pennsylvania DEMOCRAT Party that challenged various aspects of the state’s absentee-ballot system in light of the coronavirus pandemic. Last month, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, citing a voting-rights provision of the state’s constitution, ordered several modifications to voting rules, including extending the deadline by which mail-in ballots must be received in order for them to be counted. Previously, that deadline was Election Day, but the state court ruled that ballots should be counted if they are received up to three days after Election Day unless a “preponderance of the evidence” shows that a ballot was mailed after Election Day.
That means that ballots lacking clear postmarks may be counted if received by Nov. 6.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/10/supreme-court-leaves-in-place-order-requiring-pennsylvania-to-count-absentee-ballots-after-election-day/
Son of the Revolution
Banned
A deadlocked Supreme Court on Monday let stand a lower-court ruling that requires Pennsylvania election officials to count absentee ballots received within three days after Election Day, Nov. 3, even if they are not postmarked. In two brief orders issued shortly after 7 p.m., the justices denied, without explanation, a request by Republicans to put the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling on hold. Four justices – Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh – indicated that they would have granted the Republicans’ request.
The order came in a lawsuit filed by the Pennsylvania DEMOCRAT Party that challenged various aspects of the state’s absentee-ballot system in light of the coronavirus pandemic. Last month, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, citing a voting-rights provision of the state’s constitution, ordered several modifications to voting rules, including extending the deadline by which mail-in ballots must be received in order for them to be counted. Previously, that deadline was Election Day, but the state court ruled that ballots should be counted if they are received up to three days after Election Day unless a “preponderance of the evidence” shows that a ballot was mailed after Election Day.
That means that ballots lacking clear postmarks may be counted if received by Nov. 6.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/10/supreme-court-leaves-in-place-order-requiring-pennsylvania-to-count-absentee-ballots-after-election-day/
so the democrats did cheat
Christ, you're stupid, cum gargler.
He doesn't live in the UK, cum gargler.
How come you've never asked Iolo/Penderyn that question, cum gargler?
The possibility certainly exists.
So now it's "I believe". 
One ballot would have been too many if election integrity was important, wouldn't it?
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
You might consider guzzling more semen, seeing that's all you're good for.
Christ, you're stupid, cum gargler.
Tom doesn't live in the UK, cum gargler.
How come you've never asked Iolo/Penderyn that question, cum gargler?
Heh. I'm enjoying this. 
Old Trapper
Verified User
Did any one of your kind of low IQ Repugnant toady ever post any actual proof that the 52 ballots were actually from the same address, or person? Or was that just bull shit like most of your arguments.
A deadlocked Supreme Court on Monday let stand a lower-court ruling that requires Pennsylvania election officials to count absentee ballots received within three days after Election Day, Nov. 3, even if they are not postmarked. In two brief orders issued shortly after 7 p.m., the justices denied, without explanation, a request by Republicans to put the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling on hold. Four justices – Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh – indicated that they would have granted the Republicans’ request.
The order came in a lawsuit filed by the Pennsylvania DEMOCRAT Party that challenged various aspects of the state’s absentee-ballot system in light of the coronavirus pandemic. Last month, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, citing a voting-rights provision of the state’s constitution, ordered several modifications to voting rules, including extending the deadline by which mail-in ballots must be received in order for them to be counted. Previously, that deadline was Election Day, but the state court ruled that ballots should be counted if they are received up to three days after Election Day unless a “preponderance of the evidence” shows that a ballot was mailed after Election Day.
That means that ballots lacking clear postmarks may be counted if received by Nov. 6.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/10/supreme-court-leaves-in-place-order-requiring-pennsylvania-to-count-absentee-ballots-after-election-day/
"...the state court ruled that ballots should be counted if they are received up to three days after Election Day unless a “preponderance of the evidence” shows that a ballot was mailed after Election Day. That means that ballots lacking clear postmarks may be counted if received by Nov. 6."
MAY be counted, not WILL be counted.
Tell me how a “preponderance of the evidence” shows that a ballot without a postmark was mailed after Election Day.
Then tell me how many ballots without a postmark weren't counted.
I'll wait.