WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE POST 2020 ELECTION FORSENIC AUDITS PROVE BIDEN CHEATED

let's start at the beginning. There are people here who said they were in Q and others that showed they agreed with its"philosophy". Deal with facts. It will not be painful.

I have never met a single Q person anywhere on this site. Not even sure what it is. Deal with THAT fact, dumb-ass. :laugh:
 
The Texas case was thrown out because it did not involve a dispute between two states as the plaintiffs claimed. Also, it presented no evidence of fraud. Several of the cases involved examination of evidence. The states defending their count explained all their actions people claimed were fraud and the courts ruled none of the actions would have changed the election results.

Trump lost no matter how long his supporters refuse to believe the facts. In about fifteen minutes you can prove several of the claims Trump made were false:

1. It is not true that no president ever lost when he won both FL and OH as Trump claimed. Even if did occur it does not prove fraud. But Nixon lost after winning FL and OH.

2. It is not true that no Republican member of Congress ever lost when Trump was on the ticket. Two Republican senators lost in 2020 (AZ and CO).

3. There were no counties/states/precincts that had a larger number of voters than registered voters. A few scattered precincts had maybe on more vote than the number of registered voters (usually provisional ballots).

If Trump could not even get these simple facts correct he certainly could not prove others in which he has no evidence. Many of those affidavits did not make any accusations of illegal acts.

The suits are crap and the judges know it.

Definition of Motion to Dismiss

Noun

  1. A motion filed by either party in a lawsuit asking the court to throw out part of the case, or the case in its entirety.

Reasons for Filing a Motion to Dismiss


A Motion to Dismiss is often filed with the court at the earliest stages of the lawsuit, typically before either party has conducted their discovery. This is done when the defendant believes a claim in the lawsuit is legally invalid, or there are legitimate grounds for throwing the case out of court. When a Motion to Dismiss is filed, information supporting the grounds for dismissal must be included in the motion. There are different reasons for filing a Motion to Dismiss, many of which revolve around the following legal deficiencies:

Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction


The court in which the lawsuit was filed does not have jurisdiction, or the authority, to rule on the matter at hand. For example, a suit requesting enforcement of a child support order cannot be heard in small claims court.

Lack of Personal Jurisdiction


The court does not have the authority to rule on matters that affect one or all of the parties. For example, if Bob is in a car accident in Florida, and the other party involved in the accident files a lawsuit in California, the court would not be able to hear the case.

Improper Venue


The court, or “venue,” in which the matter has been fined is the wrong court to hear the case. For example, Amanda’s accountant, Charlie, siphoned money out of her account for his personal use. Charlie is charged with the crime of embezzlement in criminal court. Amanda wants to sue Charlie for her financial losses, but the criminal court cannot hear that part of the case, as it is not the proper venue. Amanda must file a lawsuit in civil court for damages related to the crime.

Failure to State a Claim for Which Relief Can be Granted


If the plaintiff fails to provide sufficient facts to, if taken on face value as being true, indicate that the defendant violated a law, or caused harm or loss due to negligence, he has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted. In other words, if the complaint does not clearly say what the defendant did wrong, the court cannot grant any form of relief, and so the case does not need to be heard. For example, there is a company policy that employees greet one another in a friendly manner at work. Joe files a lawsuit claiming that Bob failed to say hello in passing. Bob can file a Motion to Dismiss, as failing to greet another person is not illegal, therefore there is no claim for which relief can be granted.

https://legaldictionary.net/motion-to-dismiss/

Preliminary examinations, which are cursory at best. He is right. All of these cases were thrown out over the same technicality that made no sense (standing) before the evidence was even able to be presented.

What I mean by "the same technicality that made no sense":

How can President Trump have no standing to be the one filing the suit as the person being robbed of the presidency? How can Texas not have standing when it is their voters who are being disenfranchised? How can everyone who files any lawsuit, even with Democrat witnesses, digital forensic evidence, and even video evidence of widespread voter fraud to submit, all be dismissed without any examination of the evidence, all over standing? Who DOES have standing if not the people being screwed over? The courts left literally no possible way for anyone to ever present the evidence in a court of law, based on literally nothing.

The swamp violently shoved through its Manchurian Candidate, and now they want the American people to sit down, shut up, and take what they are given. :nodyes:
 
Last edited:
Dear fucking idiot Q boy



It’s not possible


There was no cheating by Biden


Fuck you very much

Translation: I don't want it to be true so it doesn't matter if the laws of mathematics literally prove Biden is not the president. It's not possible because I don't like it.

giphy.webp


Another well-researched, fact-based, logical counterpoint full of links we can all follow. :hand:

:laugh:
 
They can't, apparently. Even the ones who claim to ignore me entirely are besotted with my every post. It's possible their fixation on me is pathological in nature.

Funny how that works, right? :nodyes:

Usually goes something like this:

-You're an irrelevant idiot, no one is going to listen to you.

-Did you notice how irrelevant I said you were?

-I said you were irrelevant.

-Did you notice how no one cares what you think?

And so on. Not phony at all. :rofl2:
 
The wiener dog is a Bogan Aussie. TBH, I'm impressed that he can log on and type a post. Most cannot.

There's a reason why Americans can have almost any Aussie chick if they think the American can get them away from Aussie men. :)

Because they're low IQ and easy to dominate like you? :thinking:
 
Yep, me and the sixty judges.

And you, too. :D

Ad populum fallacy. :bs:

ANY number of judges can dismiss a case over a frivolous technicality and it still not indicate a single thing about the digital forensics evidence, the Democrat witnesses confirming Democrat cheating, the video evidence of coordinated voter fraud, the Democrat officials changing election rules in the middle of counting in open defiance of the law, etc.

You're dishonestly trying to use technicalities and biased swamp Obama appointees to pretend the independently verifiable proof isn't overwhelming. :nono:

Have some integrity. If Democrat DNA doesn't forbid that kind of thing entirely.
 
DEMOCRATS like to claim that "Trump lost all the legal cases".

Let’s take a look.

The majority of the lawsuits were about constitutional issues, mail in ballot deadlines, insufficient poll observers, etc.

The most important of the fraud lawsuits was Texas v Pennsylvania.

That wasn't lost - it was rejected due to a lack of standing.

Pirkle v. Wolf was withdrawn.

Metcalfe v. Wolf wasn't heard because of a technicality. Supposedly the deadline to file a Class ll lawsuit had passed.

In Michigan, Bally v. Whitmer was withdrawn after the judge denied a request for an independent audit.

King vs. Whitmer was denied a hearing because it was "too late" with the comment that the “ship has sailed.”

Feehan v. Wisconsin was denied a hearing due to a lack of standing.

Trump v. Hobbs was dropped because Arizona finished counting their votes before the case could be heard.

Bowyer v. Ducey was rejected due to a lack of standing.

Burk v. Ducey was dismissed due to “lack of standing and the failure to file a timely verified election contest.”

Pearson v. Kemp was dismissed as moot because the court lacked jurisdiction.

Wood v. Raffensberger was denied for a lack of standing and because it was filed too late.

None of these cases were rejected on merit or evidential grounds.

These cases were rejected or withdrawn for procedural reasons, time constraints, etc. Not one was "lost".

Every state had to certify their results by December 8th.

On December 14th the Electoral College had to vote.

On January 5th Congress had to certify the results.

Of all this would have been fine, except that the DEMOCRATS extra-legally extended balloting way past the statutory limits in key states - by design.

That left very short timeframes to gather evidence, file suits, and then argue it before (mainly hostile) courts. Multiple state elections had to be challenged to overturn the results.

SCOTUS refused to get involved.

So here we are, and now that the dust has settled, DEMOCRATS refuse to allow a second look.

Yes, exactly. As usual, the only people trying to actually see the facts of what happened are the conservatives. :nodyes:
 
I believe Faux News is mainstream media.

Democrats lie with labels incessantly. Like calling themselves pro-choice when they are anti-choice on 99% of issues...pretty much everything that ISN'T killing babies. Likewise, most of what is called the "mainstream media" is lunatic left-wing fringe, especially when compared to the right-of-center American people. So I don't know where to place FOX, definitely to the right of them, but they are closer to the center for where the American people are than the "mainstream" media ever has been. And they are usually vindicated on all the disastrous fake news implosions that humiliate the "mainstream" media, like:

-the "Trump cleared out a protest to give a speech" hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax
 
Nope.

He was busy.

Notice the fallacy being used by christiefan915 here.

President Trump: I'm going to drain the swamp

Democrats: Launch a thousand hoaxes, coup attempts, riots, declare secession, burn everything down, and eventually still have to come in manually and steal the election outright in broad daylight to stop him (the Made in China swamp really wanted its country back from the American people)

Democrats: President Trump didn't keep his promise to drain the swamp.

Well yeah, obviously, because YOU committed every felony humanly possible to destroy him. That tends to be what happens, genius. :laugh:
 
Proving it was all done legally despite the whining from TrumpCo.

No, genius, that's the whole point being made here. I can break out the crayons if necessary. Being dismissed on the same BS technicality that holds no legal water before the damning and overwhelming evidence is ever even able to be presented...IN NO WAY indicates ANYTHING about the merits of the case.

This militant willful blindness you're clinging to is just you liking the outcome so you call it valid without even looking anything up or even TRYING to be accurate or honest.

200.webp


Try debating with an iota or two of integrity next time. :nono:
 
That only ends in war.

I would love to be wrong. If there are some hidden reserves of George Washingtons out there ready to jump out and defy thousands of years of human nature to make us the one group of people ever to be at the end of the Liberty-Tyranny Cycle and take a widespread liberty stand, so be it. But I see an increasingly shrinking minority of patriots who get Natural Rights and what the Founding of this country accomplished and put in place...and a country of people waiting to be told what to do next, thinking about what they're going to get at Starbucks tomorrow. That kind of entranced complacency only gets disturbed by hard core horrors of war or abject tyranny. I'm guessing the latter will be what wakes everyone up.
 
The "Audits" are not being conducted by honest people. Nothing will be done.

If objective audits were conducted that proved such a thing, still nothing would be done with relation to Biden being president, because he became president by the Constitutional process of Congress certifying him as President. What might happen in such an unlikely case is a lot of new voting restrictions and hopefully some arrests. Are audits going on in Pennsylvania; Michigan; Wisconsin, etc?



The audit in Arizona is being live - streamed, right now (so you can watch for yourself what is going on in the tallying/auditing rooms), and there are independent scrutineers, in place observing the process. I believe that an audit is also underway in Georgia now, and California, with other "Swing States" like Pennsylvania and Michigan to follow.




As to people who say: "Oh, nothing will happen, anyway - even if there is evidence of large-scale fraud uncovered in these auditing processes that shows Trump actually won the Nov 2020 election." I would say, I understand your skepticism. After all, the Judiciary let the American people down badly when Team Trump tried to challenge the integrity of the election result. Trump was also having to fight the mainstream Democrat media (CNN and MSNBC, etc.) plus "Big Tech", plus a totally corrupt FBI and DOJ.






Still, 76 million American voted for Trump in November, 2020, and since Biden was inaugurated I think quite a lot of people who voted Democrat are regretting their decision (they did not realize that they would be voting in a Marxist administration. The Biden regime's first few months in power have been a complete disaster; we have seen: an immigration crisis at Southern Border that was deliberately triggered by the regime; there is now a looming threat of serious economic inflation; the insane forfeiting of America's energy independence; foreign policy blunders that have reignited an Palestinian-Israeli conflict, shortly after the Trump administration's much welcomed "Abraham Accords" (2020) had held out real hope for a new era of peace in the region; the Biden regime's foreign policy blundering could well end up dragging America into another war; a growing number of parents groups across America are furious at the politicization of their children's school curriculum, in particular, with the teaching of the extreme, hate-fueled, racist content derived from Critical Race Theory.





I think that the 76 million Americans who voted for Trump/Pence ticket, will only put up with so much. There ARE limits to just how much BS they will cop. They saw a Presidential election process in November 2020 that was clearly riddled with major "irregularities." In fact, the stench of electoral corruption was everywhere, and none of those federal government agencies or national institutions who are trusted to impartially investigate complaints of ballot fraud and other allegations of electoral shenanigans took any action WHATSOEVER.





If the hand-counted, forensic, post -2020 election audits of election results in Swing States like Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, etc; conclude find there is enough evidence of systemic ballot fraud favoring the Biden-Harris ticket/ enough illegal ballots cast for Biden-Harris, etc; to state that Biden is not a legitimately- elected President, what that means is that the U.S. Constitution has been "nullified" and you are no longer living in what was called the United States of America.





There has to be a point where the partisan, (Democrat) Mainstream Media, "Big Tech" etc; agree to accept that the election result audits are being conducted in a rigorous objective, scientific manner and that all reasonable security measures (like independent scrutineers, 24/7 live-stream coverage of all aspects of the auditing processes etc) have been put in place in order to do the very best that can realistically be done to detect any kind of foul-play. At least you would think so ?





If these forensic audits of the 2020 election Swing States do eventually conclude that Trump was the rightful winner of the November Presidential election last year, then I think those Americans who voted for him are going to be very, very pissed off. In particular, because they now know that the left-leaning MSM will either not cover the issue at all, or, will work assiduously to undermine public confidence in the audit reports; while "Big Tech" will be complicit in censoring public debate on the story. On top of this, those who voted Trump/Republican in 2020 are now more fully aware that they cannot trust their federal agencies like :the FBI or the DOJ, nor the Judicial system to take any proper/appropriate action. Basically, because the FBI and the DOJ are now TOTALLY and irredeemably corrupt - rotten to the core. And as for the Federal Courts, I would have very little faith in their ability to function with any kind of moral integrity, either. Building public trust in these government agencies and institutions takes a long , long time , and this trust can be very rapidly lost. I mean, who in America could possibly trust the current US Supreme Court to do the right thing any longer, after Chief Justice Roberts punted the "Texas vs Pennsylvania, etc." lawsuit ? Who could possibly trust the DOJ ? Where's the "Durham Report ?" Why haven't the FBI investigated Joe Biden re evidence of his direct involvement in Hunter Biden's crooked business dealings with the Chinese Communist Party and corrupt entities in the Ukraine and so on? WOULD YOU TRUST THEM ?




I -, AND I EMPHASISE - "IF", the process of post-2020 election results auditing finds that Trump was CLEARLY the rightful winner of last November's Presidential election and people who voted Trump/Pence simply do not trust "the system" to correct the outcome, THEN WHAT WILL HAPPEN ?





It seems to me that there is NO WAY on Earth, even after they are caught cheating "red-handed", Biden and Co. would EVER relinquish their grip on power, and those many Americans who voted Trump might ultimately become so frustrated and angry that they decide take the law into their own hands - remember America is not like Venezuela, there are 300,000 firearms owned by members of the American public, in Venezuela, there are none. Conservative militiamen could organize themselves into brigades in Red States, and then form a united armed front. The united front would then demand the Biden regime stand down.




If this happened, or began to happen, the US Military would have to chose between putting down the Conservative militiamen or ousting the Biden regime in a "Coup d'etat" I do not think the modern-day US Army would ever fire on its own people; nor do I think the US Defense Force Chiefs are at all impressed with the Biden Regime's foreign policy, so, a Coup d'etat would be the most likely eventuality, IMO. The Coup leaders would simply order Biden and Harris to stand down, and take them and probably the Cabinet into custody. Martial Law would be declared in order, ( mainly) to pre-empt the possibility of any, large-scale, prolonged leftist/anarchist rioting rioting taking place, such as that which took place across America in the summer months of 2020. When the situation in America was deemed to have re- stabilized and re- normalized, Trump would be officially installed as the legitimate, CONSTITUTIONALl POTUS and invited to form a new administration.





This is JUST MY VIEW of how things could unfold in the near future in America. It's a view I have formed mainly because I am absolutely convinced that the November 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and that Joe Biden is not a legitimate President.





And it's possible, of course, that any audits conducted in the Swing States may prove me dead wrong.





Also, Biden and his regime are directly hooked up with some extremely powerful people, not just in America, but around the world ( People like George Soros, for instance, and his various (political) organizations, who funnel huge amounts of money into the Democratic Party coffers, and to activist groups closely affiliated with the Democrats, every year). I think the sheer extent and magnitude of the giant Globalist/Marxist political forces opposing one American populist/nationalist like Donald Trump are staggering, so really it is impossible to say what might happen in American politics the near future. I do realize that. I would just like to say that the fact Donald Trump managed to survive in office from 2017 to 2021, and not just "survive", but get done what he did, is a miracle. I have absolutely no idea where he found the moral strength to prevail against the truly evil forces that were hell-bent on destroying him, 24/7.




The only thing I can state for sure is that right now the Biden regime is CLEARLY a Marxist dispensation, and Marxist/socialist administrations ALWAYS end in disaster and horror wherever in the world they have been attempted. So, I hope that the Biden government is peacefully and promptly removed before it has the opportunity to inflict any serious, long-term damage on America and the American people.




Dachshund



DLM...Dachshund Lives Matter !
 
Last edited:
Since that is as unlikely to happen as all the Aussie chicks** moving to America, I'm not worried about it.



**Aussie women loooove American men because all Aussie men are dumbass bogans who can't take a leak without peeing themselves.

vb-editor.jpg




You're right about white Aussie chicks not moving to America, Uncle. I mean, why would they ? Hottie, White OZZY Chicks don't like violence, like the major BLM riots you had in America in 2020. They took one look at that fiasco and said to themselves: There no way I'd ever live in the US, there are too many serious race problems with the Blacks there. And in America when the Bungees riot and loot and set cities alight no one does a fucking thing, the authorities just let them keep running amok. When our girls saw this on TV, they all thought: "Fuck that for a game of soldiers, mate !" Good-looking Aussie Chicks don't find that kind of BS very amusing at all, Uncle, because we keep our Blacks on a very short tether I can assure you. Also, Aussie chicks would NOT be impressed with the amount of gun crime going down in a lot of your cities because your moron Democrat politicians (like commie Bill "Sandinista" D'Blazio and that fugly, pop-eyed, lesbian, bitch, Lori Lightfoot in Chicago, - I've seen better heads in a piss trough, I can tell you, Uncle - for ex) have slashed. their police department budgets. You see, Uncle, classy, good-looking, White Australian girls don't really like guns at all, they think guns are scary, and they don't like being around them or hearing that 200 Bungees have blown each others brains out in New York last weekend (and that's progress folks ! because the weekend before it was 250).



If you want to attract any tasty, White, Aussie girls to the States, Uncle, you Yanks will need to "pull the finger out" and start cleaning up your act - BIG TIME. You might start by building yourselves a proper Southern Border Wall, so the unwashed masses of The Third World, like: US welfare state immigrants from Honduras and Guatamala and Mexico, terrorists from fucking Syria and God knows where else, human traffikers, rapists, Cartel drug smugglers, violent MS-13 gang-members and other criminal scum aren't pouring into your country.




If you want some more tips - just let me know, Uncle. I'm always happy to help !



Toodle - oo, Sport !



Dachshund




Dachshund Lives Matter !
 
Last edited:


I would love to be wrong. If there are some hidden reserves of George Washingtons out there ready to jump out and defy thousands of years of human nature to make us the one group of people ever to be at the end of the Liberty-Tyranny Cycle and take a widespread liberty stand, so be it. But I see an increasingly shrinking minority of patriots who get Natural Rights and what the Founding of this country accomplished and put in place...and a country of people waiting to be told what to do next, thinking about what they're going to get at Starbucks tomorrow. That kind of entranced complacency only gets disturbed by hard core horrors of war or abject tyranny. I'm guessing the latter will be what wakes everyone up.



America was founded by the descendants of English colonists. I mean the guy who actually put together the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution/ Bill of Rights were White Anglo-Saxon Protestants who had been strongly influenced by the Puritans who settled in "New England in the 17th century. Many of the fundamental concepts written into the DOI and the US Constitution/Bill of Rights came directly from England in: the Magna Carta, in English Common law, in the work of English Enlightenment philosophers like, the great John Locke and Adam Smith. Equally, English rulers like the 17th-century English Calvinist/ Puritan, Oliver Cromwell (who became Lord Protector of a Republican British Commonwealth) played an important part in triggering the American Revolutionary War.




The concept of the American Republic was a brilliant product of the White, English, Protestant mind. The White Westerner is the only man for whom the fundamental concepts of the Founding Documents of American can truly have any innate meaning What does the Negro or the Mexican care for the fundamental tenets of the the DOI, of the US Constitution, of American patriotism. I'll tell you...NOTHING. Generally speaking they could not give a flying fuck, and one reason for this is that they are cognitively incapable of grasping the beauty and the brilliance of the ideas that founded the American Republic. The Black African's world view is, by and large, completely contrary to the world view of men like Thomas Jefferson or Benjamin Franklin or George Washington. They are neurogenetically dissimilar, just for a start the the black brain is hard-wired to prefer collectivist social arrangements, while the White Western mind is genetically hard-wired to prefer individualism.




The biggest mistake America made was to imagine that it could take in an assimilate the poor and needy colored races of the world en masse People like President Lyndon Johnson believed that they would seamlessly integrate into White - Anglo Protestant American society; that they would surely eventually come to intimately internalize the founding principles of the American Republic - that they would become true patriots. NO, NO, NO, NO, NO ! THEY DO NOT The VAST MAJORITY of black and brown immigrants CAN NOT, AND WILL NEVER BE ABLE to smoothly integrate into American society (in the sense I am referring to). Because they are BIOLOGICALLY (neurologically) incapable of doing so.





Anyway, that my two cents worth re one big mistake America made in 1965. People will say it is a racist point of view, and they would be dead right. If you ask any evolutionary biologist, he will tell you that the various human races do not mix harmoniously, they do not want to, and in any nation where they are forced to, you will always have major social problems of every imaginable kind. The Japanese understand this, they are the greatest "racists" on planet Earth. If you don't believe me , try getting yourself a Visa to reside permanently in Japan. Why do the Japanese not let foreigner come to live in their country? Because they are proud of their culture and they wish to keep it as pure as possible. I understand this 100%, and I respect them for taking the hard-line that they have on foreign immigration into their country. They are a WISE people.




Dachshund



DLM...Dachshund Lives Matter !
 
Last edited:
America was founded by the descendants of English colonists. I mean the guy who actually put together the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution/ Bill of Rights were White Anglo-Saxon Protestants who had been strongly influenced by the Puritans who settled in "New England in the 17th century. Many of the fundamental concepts written into the DOI and the US Constitution/Bill of Rights came directly from England in: the Magna Carta, in English Common law, in the work of English Enlightenment philosophers like, the great John Locke and Adam Smith. Equally, English rulers like the 17th-century English Calvinist/ Puritan, Oliver Cromwell (who became Lord Protector of a Republican British Commonwealth) played an important part in triggering the American Revolutionary War.




The concept of the American Republic was a brilliant product of the White, English, Protestant mind. The White Westerner is the only man for whom the fundamental concepts of the Founding Documents of American can truly have any innate meaning What does the Negro or the Mexican care for the fundamental tenets of the the DOI, of the US Constitution, of American patriotism. I'll tell you...NOTHING. Generally speaking they could not give a flying fuck, and one reason for this is that they are cognitively incapable of grasping the beauty and the brilliance of the ideas that founded the American Republic. The Black African's world view is, by and large, completely contrary to the world view of men like Thomas Jefferson or Benjamin Franklin or George Washington. They are neurogenetically dissimilar, just for a start the the black brain is hard-wired to prefer collectivist social arrangements, while the White Western mind is genetically hard-wired to prefer individualism.




The biggest mistake America made was to imagine that it could take in an assimilate the poor and needy colored races of the world en masse People like President Lyndon Johnson believed that they would seamlessly integrate into White - Anglo Protestant American society; that they would surely eventually come to intimately internalize the founding principles of the American Republic - that they would become true patriots. NO, NO, NO, NO, NO ! THEY DO NOT The VAST MAJORITY of black and brown immigrants CAN NOT, AND WILL NEVER BE ABLE to smoothly integrate into American society (in the sense I am referring to). Because they are BIOLOGICALLY (neurologically) incapable of doing so.





Anyway, that my two cents worth re one big mistake America made in 1965. People will say it is a racist point of view, and they would be dead right. If you ask any evolutionary biologist, he will tell you that the various human races do not mix harmoniously, they do not want to, and in any nation where they are forced to, you will always have major social problems of every imaginable kind. The Japanese understand this, they are the greatest "racists" on planet Earth. If you don't believe me , try getting yourself a Visa to reside permanently in Japan. Why do the Japanese not let foreigner come to live in their country? Because they are proud of their culture and they wish to keep it as pure as possible. I understand this 100%, and I respect them for taking the hard-line that they have on foreign immigration into their country. They are a WISE people.




Dachshund



DLM...Dachshund Lives Matter !

I never cared one iota about skin color, as long as people integrate, which they no longer do since the Balkanizing of America began.
 
Back
Top