LOL USA today, now there is an unbiased source--------------said no one, ever.
You want to make this debate about sources and not substance.
OAN and Newsmax are not news networks.
LOL USA today, now there is an unbiased source--------------said no one, ever.
Journalism isn't both sides.
prove it. that is a left wing lie that has been created to justify the lie about senile Joe getting 80 million votes. the 132 million was the registered number in 2020 not 2016. Stop making up shit and posting it.
You want to make this debate about sources and not substance.
OAN and Newsmax are not news networks.
real journalism is reporting facts, not propaganda. Sadly we no longer have real journalism in this country.
I did prove it...you just refused to accept the proof because you know you're full of shit.
Fact check: ‘133 million registered voters’ argument uses flawed logic
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-...ters-argument-uses-flawed-logic-idUSKBN296284
How does it feel to have me hand your ass to you every day here?
which are news networks in your opinion? CNN? MSNBC? NY times? Wash Post? Those might as well be named Pravda.
more horseshit, your source talks about eligible votes not registered voters, do you know the difference?
You didn't read the source, did you?more horseshit, your source talks about eligible votes not registered voters, do you know the difference?
Weird because the expectation is that you would read the source and then talk about it...but you're skipping step #1.
Right, and both sides is propaganda.
So you just admitted that OAN and Newsmax are propaganda networks because they bothsides everything.
You didn't read the source, did you?
Weird because the expectation is that you would read the source and then talk about it...but you're skipping step #1.
How is she a walking clusterfuck?
Your information is false. Where did you get "the 132 million"?prove it. that is a left wing lie that has been created to justify the lie about senile Joe getting 80 million votes. the 132 million was the registered number in 2020 not 2016. Stop making up shit and posting it.
Do you like the job she is doing?
VPs never do much to begin with. So far she's flubbed a few things. It's been less than six months in the job, a job far different than being a Senator or Representative.
Her Congressional report card is mediocre: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/kamala_harris/412678
What’s most likely in your opinion...
1) Biden is re-elected.
2) Trqmp is elected.
3) a Trunp like Requblican is elected.
4) a person with ideas like the former Republican Party is elected?
5) a different Democrat is elected?
Personally I think it’s between Biden and a Trqmp like copycat.
I don’t thing Qrunp himself has a chance.
the demmycrat party is dead in the water.......Harris will run and get 5% of the vote versus whoever runs as a Republican......
there's no way the dementia ward will let him out to campaign......
Biden resigns sometime after 20JAN22 but probably before 2024. Harris becomes first woman President and runs as an incumbent...and wins. Harris becomes a 10 year President but with a Republican Senate and narrow margin in the House.
The Party of Trump shrivels and dies on the vine due to numerous criminal cases against Trump staffers and TrumpCo.
Biden second term.