Researcher Tied to Wuhan Lab Thanked Fauci for Dismissing Lab-Leak Theory

Caveat and disclaimer

Dear information consumer, this thread is a work of fiction. If you have mistakenly arrived here, know that nothing stated by the original poster of this thread or anyone agreeing with the author is based in fact or reason.
Any statement herein purporting to be fact that is true is entirely coincidental, and all conclusions and implications from purported statements of fact are false.
If you are seeking information about politics and current events you are strongly advise to leave, delete your cache and run antivirus.
Do you really think anyone actual reads your garbage????? :rofl2:
 
I deny the premise that republicans screwed up the response. The states with the worst outcomes are run by Democrats. The country should have followed DeSantis instead of Fauci.

The ‘Big Guy’ was mentioned on Hunter’s laptop and it didn’t sound so good. The Fake News about it being Russian misinformation was a cover up.

Of course you deny that. Party above people is very important.

So when is Rudy going to release it?
 
Why not? It could have came from the wet market into the lab.

But there’s no evidence that it did and I posted an email between virologists where they question whether an evolutionary process could account for the genetic changes from known Covids and the COVID19 virus.

Science.
 
But there’s no evidence that it did and I posted an email between virologists where they question whether an evolutionary process could account for the genetic changes from known Covids and the COVID19 virus.

Science.

Yes. Science. Something that Trumpkins don't understand and don't like.

Are you going to concede that Dr. Fauci never dismissed the lab leak theory? I'll post the snippet from the article the OP linked if you want.
 
Silly sarcasm. ;) Sarcasm is anger's ugly cousin.
I'm angry that you would propose such a stupid thing. I think more highly of you than that specious argument. You picked the wrong hill to die on with this one you are on the wrong side of the argument. The Science is is against you.
 
Last edited:
[FONT=&quot]The first [/FONT]article[FONT=&quot] shared by Fauci, which he appeared to have given some sort of input on, was a piece published in [/FONT]Nature on March 17, 2020, by Kristian Andersen, a microbiologist at Scripps Research, Andrew Rambaut, a professor of molecular evolution at the University of Edinburgh, W. Ian Lipkin, a professor of epidemiology at Columbia University, Edward Holmes, a virologist at the University of Sydney, and Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane University.


Gee what a bunch of hacks!!!!!!
 
Whether or not COVID leaked from a lab doesn't change the fact that Trump chose to downplay it because he knew his followers would go into a panic if he didn't.
 
We do not know the exact source of the current outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but we know that it originally came from an animal, likely a bat.
 
He dismissed it early on.

"dismissed"---that is the messaging lie part. He studied it and did not believe it and never expressed desire that it not be further studied. Why not say that?

Oh, I know why...

because---Caveat and disclaimer

Dear information consumer, this thread is a work of fiction. If you have mistakenly arrived here, know that nothing stated by the original poster of this thread or anyone agreeing with the author is based in fact or reason.
Any statement herein purporting to be fact that is true is entirely coincidental, and all conclusions and implications from purported statements of fact are false.
If you are seeking information about politics and current events you are strongly advise to leave, delete your cache and run antivirus.
 
Yes. Science. Something that Trumpkins don't understand and don't like.

Are you going to concede that Dr. Fauci never dismissed the lab leak theory? I'll post the snippet from the article the OP linked if you want.

So CNN got it wrong and it was never a conspiracy theory lol? I’m having trouble keeping up here.

You realize that if step by step evolution can’t account for the genetic changes that only leaves one other option, right?
 
We do not know the exact source of the current outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but we know that it originally came from an animal, likely a bat.

You don’t see how uninformative that statement is?

An engineered virus *originally* came from an animal, likely a bat. Weasel wording.
 
So CNN got it wrong and it was never a conspiracy theory lol? I’m having trouble keeping up here.

You realize that if step by step evolution can’t account for the genetic changes that only leaves one other option, right?

CNN article, please.

Correct. Still doesn't prove anything. Doesn't prove that it's a bioweapon.
 
Back
Top