Are smiling, well groomed Women and Seniors REALLY insurrectionists?

[ExpressLane]

Not the topic.

The topic was destruction of public property being a crime. Why are you trying to hide from my question. Can't answer questions like your fearful leader?

 

[Drummie123]

Doyou have any proof these violent insurrectionist bent on overthrowing the most powerful government in the world actually brought weapons. Perhaps the Huffington Post provided you with real evidence. Feel free to give us a link APL.

BING!

 

[AProudLefty]

Doyou have any proof these violent insurrectionist bent on overthrowing the most powerful government in the world actually brought weapons. Perhaps the Huffington Post provided you with real evidence. Feel free to give us a link APL.

That wasn't what I asked. Did people say that they tried to "overthrow" the government violently? And how?

 

[AProudLefty]

The topic was destruction of public property being a crime. Why are you trying to hide from my question. Can't answer questions like your fearful leader?

It is a whataboutism. It's a tactic to distract and point at something else, saying they did the same thing or didn't do.

Anyway, to answer your question, here's an article: https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/portland-protesters-us-agents-clash-federal-building-72649553

 

[BidenPresident]

We've seen the NASA evidence which shows the truth.

Why won't Biden make Earthly evidence about the 2020 election as transparent as Martian evidence?

It is clear. Sorry, you're just a lying scumbag.

 

[AProudLefty]

I think that's a good question.

They could make a YouTube presentation of the evidence.

But once they did that, the dishonest media and dastardly Dems could falsify evidence to negate the GOP'S truthful evidence and leave the issue in even greater doubt.

Yeah, the best way is probably to wait until a valid and proper and honest legal hearing can be had into the election 'theft.'

And when will that happen?

Falsifying the "evidence" further only makes matters worse and they'll just be digging deeper and deeper.

 

[ExpressLane]

That wasn't what I asked. Did people say that they tried to "overthrow" the government violently? And how?

Yes they call them violent insurrectionist.

AG Tong Statement On Violent Insurrection
(Hartford, CT) – Attorney General William Tong released the following statement on the violent insurrection at the U.S. Capitol today.

“This is no protest, this is a violent insurrection. We're under attack from within — figuratively and in fact,” Attorney General Tong said.

https://portal.ct.gov/AG/Press-Rele...ses/AG-Tong-Statement-On-Violent-Insurrection

 

[AProudLefty]

Yes they call them violent insurrectionist.

Definition of insurrection
: an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government

The definition fits.

 

[Drummie123]

Is that a strawman or did people actually say that?

I wonder how anyone on the Left seriously expects to be taken seriously if the rest of the country isn't willing to go along with their folly and farcical claims.

 

[AProudLefty]

I wonder how anyone on the Left seriously expects to be taken seriously if the rest of the country isn't willing to go along with their folly and farcical claims.

Do people need guns for it to be an insurrection"?

 

[Phantasmal]

Yes, the women in the sunglasses, I recognize, was videoed breaking windows. I don’t see any kids.

I got this knit capped lady confused with pink knit hat lady. Here’s her story
https://m.riverfronttimes.com/newsb...k-nancy-pelosis-sign-in-capitol-riot-feds-say

 

[Micawber]

Is the sourpuss party going to run their next election campaign just attacking the last one they lost so badly? LMAO.

Nice strategy. "Hey imbeciles, the battlefield is way over here!"

 

[Drummie123]

Definition of insurrection
: an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government

The definition fits.

And yet, the government hasn't seen fit to charge any with insurrection. At least not that I have seen.

 

[ExpressLane]

It is a whataboutism. It's a tactic to distract and point at something else, saying they did the same thing or didn't do.

Anyway, to answer your question, here's an article: https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/portland-protesters-us-agents-clash-federal-building-72649553

No its a legit question . Why is one a crime worthy of imprisonment without bail and the other isn't worth pursuing? That was back in AUGUST before the government dropped charges on them.

https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/20...ces-plan-to-recognize-the-right-to-speak.html

Nice try but no cupie doll for you.

 

[AProudLefty]

No its a legit question . Why is one a crime worthy of imprisonment without bail and the other isn't worth pursuing?

Did you read the article?

 

[AProudLefty]

And yet, the government hasn't seen fit to charge any with insurrection. At least not that I have seen.

Probably because the "insurrection" failed.

 

[Drummie123]

I got this knit capped lady confused with pink knit hat lady. Here’s her story
https://m.[B]riverfronttimes.com[/B...k-nancy-pelosis-sign-in-capitol-riot-feds-say

Riverfront, eh?

How do we know that's not a branch of the evil Stormfront?

 

[Drummie123]

Probably because the "insurrection" failed.

The attempt can be enough for imprisonment.

 

[AProudLefty]

The attempt can be enough for imprisonment.

Yeah. I think they probably just want to settle for lesser charges and get it over with.

Besides, why did they break in the Capitol? Why damage and steal stuff? What were they planning to do? And why were some of them looking for certain Congresspeople?

The smart people were outside protesting peacefully and obeying the law.

 

[Drummie123]

Do people need guns for it to be an insurrection"?

Not a torch or pitchfork have I seen.