Where have all the board lefties gone?

AssHatZombie said:
she's right. she doesn't have to show I.d. unless police suspect a crime is being committed.
Click to expand...

The crime was assault...that's why she was arrested...she threatened to put people at risk by refusing to wear a mask in the store. So she was booked for assault.

Get used to that, because it's going to keep happening until you get your shit together.
 
LV426 said:
The crime was assault...that's why she was arrested...she threatened to put people at risk by refusing to wear a mask in the store. So she was booked for assault.

Get used to that, because it's going to keep happening until you get your shit together.
Click to expand...

that's obviously insane. you're just redefining what words mean. nobody believes you're correct. even those cops go home and feel ashamed of what they did.
 
AssHatZombie said:
that's obviously insane. you're just redefining what words mean. nobody believes you're correct. even those cops go home and feel ashamed of what they did.
Click to expand...

That's why they arrested her, so if you have a problem with it, talk to them.

The store was probably the one who pressed charges against her.

As I said, if you continue to be intransigent, then what happened to that bitch is going to keep happening to you and your friends over and over and over and over.

Get your shit together.
 
LV426 said:
That's why they arrested her, so if you have a problem with it, talk to them.

The store was probably the one who pressed charges against her.

As I said, if you continue to be intransigent, then what happened to that bitch is going to keep happening to you and your friends over and over and over and over.

Get your shit together.
Click to expand...

lol. make me. you can't. bring it on, shithound.
 
christiefan915 said:
Most of the board lefties are still here. The problem is that this forum has turned into Conspiracy Theory Central and it's impossible to post with people who still write crap like "the election was stolen from trump," "Biden's a pedophile," or "Chauvin was only convicted because the judge and jury were too afraid not to."

We lefties require a minimum level of sanity to respond to, lol.
Click to expand...

:good4u:
 
Primavera said:
I can see at least four grounds for appeal in the Chauvin trial.

The jury should have been sequestered

The trial should have been moved out of state

The city's announcement of a $27M payout before trial had even started was truly disgusting

Mad Maxine Waters incitement to violence. She should definitely be impeached and removed from the chair of the Finance Committee

Let me ask you a question do you believe in fair trials for all or not? That was not a fair trial by any means, Dershowitz believes Mad Max behaved like the KKK to intimidate the jury. I frankly cannot see how that's even up for discussion.

https://www.newsweek.com/alan-dersh...tactics-intimidate-jury-chauvin-trial-1585111
Click to expand...

I can't read that link without setting up an account, even to read it for free. I know you didn't create those four points but I see them as a canned response by Chauvin supporters who knew how damning the video is, and what an uphill fight it would be to find him not guilty. I also think the furor over Waters' comments to "get more active" and "get more confrontational" is overblown because she's a black woman, and certainly a glaring double standard given RW acceptance of trump's words ""We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," before the Capitol insurrection.

Of course I believe in fair trials for all, what a question. I also believe that these days a "fair trial" depends on which side you're on. Example, I don't believe the Zimmerman trial was fair, that the evidence to convict him was strong, and that he got away with murder. Same with the Philando Castile trial, the Tamir Rice investigation, the Eric Garner investigation and numerous others.

When I look at the video of Chauvin at the scene, his behaviour and facial expressions, I see a depraved indifference to human life. Fortunately the jury saw it that way too.

Btw look closely at the pics, Chauvin's knee was definitely on Floyd's neck, not his back.

derek-chauvin.jpg
 
Last edited:
christiefan915 said:
I can't read that link without setting up an account, even to read it for free. I know you didn't create those four points but I see them as a canned response by Chauvin supporters who knew how damning the video is, and what an uphill fight it would be to find him not guilty. I also think the furor over Waters' comments to "get more active" and "get more confrontational" is overblown because she's a black woman, and certainly a glaring double standard given RW acceptance of trump's words ""We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," before the Capitol insurrection.

Of course I believe in fair trials for all, what a question. I also believe that these days a "fair trial" depends on which side you're on. Example, I don't believe the Zimmerman trial was fair, that the evidence to convict him was strong, and that he got away with murder. Same with the Philando Castile trial, the Tamir Rice investigation, the Eric Garner investigation and numerous others.

When I look at the video of Chauvin at the scene, his behavior and facial expressions, I see a depraved indifference to human life. Fortunately the jury saw it that way too.

Btw look closely at the pics, Chauvin's knee was definitely on Floyd's neck, not his back.
Click to expand...

This is what a good friend of mine, who is a doctor, has to say! I will address the rest later.

The autopsy report is interesting. On page 2 it states that there were no life threatening signs of injury - anywhere! Injuries sure - but all were fairly trivial and superficial - none were life theatening. Examination of the incised neck showed no sign of trauma. So, if the sustained pressure on the neck was meant to have killed him why is there no sign of trauma in the tissues involved? This pressure must have been considerable because it would need to occlude both carotid artieries and would have therefore also occluded his airway. Floyd was clearly able to speak during the first 6 mins of the knee being placed on his neck - he constantly said he couldn't breath. This also implies that the blood supply via the carotid arteries was not being significantly compromised - these arteries supply blood to large areas of the brain and in the event of being compromised a person would faint, or have a stroke. Given that Floyd is talking, albeit and understandably, complaining during this time, the blood supply must have been sufficient for normal brain function. The first 6 mins is significant because he then faints BUT if, as suggested above and supported by the autopsy report there was no tissue trauma present, the fainting was not caused by excessive trauma to the neck then it must have had another cause. We don't have to look far for that cause - as Tom has pointed out, his heart was a time fuse. Again the autopsy shows that Floyd had severe, multifocal, arteriosclerotic heart disease plus hypertension with biventricular dilation - his heart was struggling to cope!
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
christiefan915 said:
I can't read that link without setting up an account, even to read it for free. I know you didn't create those four points but I see them as a canned response by Chauvin supporters who knew how damning the video is, and what an uphill fight it would be to find him not guilty. I also think the furor over Waters' comments to "get more active" and "get more confrontational" is overblown because she's a black woman, and certainly a glaring double standard given RW acceptance of trump's words ""We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," before the Capitol insurrection.

Of course I believe in fair trials for all, what a question. I also believe that these days a "fair trial" depends on which side you're on. Example, I don't believe the Zimmerman trial was fair, that the evidence to convict him was strong, and that he got away with murder. Same with the Philando Castile trial, the Tamir Rice investigation, the Eric Garner investigation and numerous others.

When I look at the video of Chauvin at the scene, his behaviour and facial expressions, I see a depraved indifference to human life. Fortunately the jury saw it that way too.

Btw look closely at the pics, Chauvin's knee was definitely on Floyd's neck, not his back.

derek-chauvin.jpg
Click to expand...

Logical response to the likes of these right wing rabble is usually met with their parroting the SOS. But it's nice to see your take down done so eloquently.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top