He's guilty

ExpressLane said:
I'm not shocked you are way off. Its typical for you. I predicted 3rd degree murder but I didn't watch the trial . Maxine Waters and her fat mouth has set up an appeal for Chauvin. The politicians should have shut up and stop the virtue signaling. Its OK to voice an opinion AFTER the verdict but not before it.
Click to expand...

Dear fucking idiot


He would have to prove they all heard her remark and that it altered their decision


And it didn’t

And they won’t say that



Most likely never knew she said it


They had been repeatedly reminded not to watch news


Face it racist

Your losing your little race war


Fuck you very much
 
ExpressLane said:
Yep they were all intimidated. Remember the JUUDGE even said Maxine Waters gave the defense a reason to appeal.
Click to expand...

His statement is meaningless. The decision is fact based. What makes you think they were intimidated. The ones making death threats are almost always the Trumptards.
 
evince said:
Dear fucking idiot


He would have to prove they all heard her remark and that it altered their decision


And it didn’t

And they won’t say that



Most likely never new she said it


They had been repeatedly reminded not to watch news


Face it racist

Your losing your little race war


Fuck you very much
Click to expand...
No he would have to prove one person heard her remarks and influenced others. And BTW I have always thought he was guilty. So stuff your little moronic race remarks up your ass. Moron.
 
the two saddest things about this is that.....
1. if floyd had been white, liberals would not have cared one iota
2. republicans would still have believed if he'd just obeyed lawful orders, he'd still be alive.......

you're a bunch of morons
 
ExpressLane said:
No he would have to prove one person heard her remarks and influenced others. And BTW I have always thought he was guilty. So stuff your little moronic race remarks up your ass. Moron.
Click to expand...

Ain't gonna happen. That jury spoke as one. So if you thought he was guilty, why would the jury have to be intimidated?
 
Concart said:
His statement is meaningless. The decision is fact based. What makes you think they were intimidated. The ones making death threats are almost always the Trumptards.
Click to expand...
The 10 hour decision. They obviously did not systematically review all the evidence. This reminds me of the OJ trial. The jury was out a short time because they were afraid of the impact a guilty verdict might have on them personally.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
the two saddest things about this is that.....
1. if floyd had been white, liberals would not have cared one iota
2. republicans would still have believed if he'd just obeyed lawful orders, he'd still be alive.......

you're a bunch of morons
Click to expand...



Remember the thread I posted about the 78 year old dementia lady who the cop tackled and hog tied?


So fuck you 360 degrees
 
ExpressLane said:
The 10 hour decision. They obviously did not systematically review all the evidence. This reminds me of the OJ trial. The jury was out a short time because they were afraid of the impact a guilty verdict might have on them personally.
Click to expand...

this case is nothing like the OJ case...............video evidence being the primary difference............now, unless you wish to classify most of the population as retarded trolls, you lose
 
ExpressLane said:
The 10 hour decision. They obviously did not systematically review all the evidence. This reminds me of the OJ trial. The jury was out a short time because they were afraid of the impact a guilty verdict might have on them personally.
Click to expand...

Why not?

They could have easily done it if they all agreed at every point


It appears that is what happened
 
evince said:
Remember the thread I posted about the 78 year old dementia lady who the cop tackled and hog tied?

So fuck you 360 degrees
Click to expand...

I do remember...........but apparentlly you don't because I also condemned that cop who tackled her.............but by all means let your partisan bullshit mindset control your gutter whore life
 
ExpressLane said:
The 10 hour decision. They obviously did not systematically review all the evidence. This reminds me of the OJ trial. The jury was out a short time because they were afraid of the impact a guilty verdict might have on them personally.
Click to expand...

10-12 hours is very typical for a murder trial. There wasn't much for them to examine. They saw a murder on tape. Your suggestion is stupid. They could have avoided serving on that jury if they had wanted to. They didn't. They were seated, they did their job, and your suggestion that something untoward happened is an insult to them.
 
WE NEED MORE attorny generals like keith ellison....................cudos to him for assemblinga good team
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top