He's guilty

[Legion]

You might want to read up on what he said about Waters and politicians in general sticking their noses into this trial.

What he said made no difference. He refused to declare a mistrial. Can you blame him?

 

[domer76]

No similarities whatsoever.

No threats to burn cities to the ground in the OJ trial. And, nothing happened.

The jurors here were terrified for their lives, evidence be damned. That is clear after seeing the evidence.

You don’t know from shit that the jurors were terrified. The evidence was overwhelming.

Clown

 

[Legion]

There was just as much pro Chauvin crap on t.v..

Is that so?

LINK

 

[BidenPresident]

You don’t know from shit that the jurors were terrified. The evidence was overwhelming.

Clown

Right wing racists cannot understand the concept of justice.

 

[TTQ64]

He favored the defense the entire time. He made sure there would be no grounds for appeal.

he repeated right wing talking points about maxine waters.........

sailor is a right wing punk

 

[Sailor]

I watched it on recording. He dismissed the claim, but was angry about ALL politicians who weighed in.

There was just as much pro Chauvin crap on t.v.. If you think the jurors were worried about Waters, Nelson thanks you.

Not "all" politicians. Waters in particular. He made that quite clear. I am surprised CNN actually reported it. "

(CNN)The judge overseeing former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin's trial in the death of George Floyd said Monday that Rep. Maxine Waters' comments could be grounds for appealing a verdict in the trial.
"I'll give you that Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned," Judge Peter Cahill told defense attorney Eric Nelson on Monday.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/19/politics/judge-derek-chauvin-maxine-waters-mistrial-appeal/index.html

 

[NiftyNiblick]

You said that he might actually prefer the death sentence. My suggestion is less torturous than the cocktails they use in capital cases.

Judicial lethal injection is punitive execution, not humane euthanasia.
Judicial lethal injection is not a humane process.

I believe only in humane euthanasia,
the way we put down pets when their quality of life is done.

It's civil exclusion either way--the offender is excluded from our midst--but starkly different in many, many ways.

 

[archives]

What he said made no difference. He refused to declare a mistrial. Can you blame him?

Now tell us there “copy,” how many times has a sitting Judge suddenly declared a mistrial on his own case for events that aren’t occurring in the Court room?

 

[Sailor]

What he said made no difference. He refused to declare a mistrial. Can you blame him?

He was not talking about a mistrial. He was talking about the appeals court overturning it.

 

[TTQ64]

Yes

wrong answer...............they murder blacks off camera all the time.

that means you all will take the kops word for it...........thats not change.

 

[Legion]

The judge overseeing former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin's trial in the death of George Floyd said Monday that Rep. Maxine Waters' comments could be grounds for appealing a verdict in the trial. "I'll give you that Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned," Judge Peter Cahill told defense attorney Eric Nelson on Monday.

That's just right wing talking points about Maxine Waters.

 

[Legion]

wrong answer...............they murder blacks off camera all the time.

Is that so?

 

[LV426]

That I disagree with. You can hear them on video trying to do the right thing. Their training officer was ignoring them. There was a recent reversal of a cop being fired decades ago. She stopped another cop from strangling a perp. She was fired and stripped of her pension.

They corrected that last week.

Which cops?

The three that were with Chauvin? They didn't try to do the right thing...those were the bystanders and off-duty people.

The three of Chauvin's accomplices were preventing people from treating Floyd.

If they weren't, then they would have been Prosecution witnesses.

 

[Concart]

No similarities whatsoever.

No threats to burn cities to the ground in the OJ trial. And, nothing happened.

The jurors here were terrified for their lives, evidence be damned. That is clear after seeing the evidence.

No they weren't. They saw the evidence. They convicted on the evidence. Stop making excuses for a murderer.

 

[Legion]

He was not talking about a mistrial. He was talking about the appeals court overturning it.

I know that. He also denied the defense motion for a mistrial.

 

[Legion]

They convicted on the evidence.

Just like the court that convicted Dreyfus.

 

[Sailor]

I know that. He also denied the defense motion for a mistrial.

To far along for a mistrial Legion and you are right he let fear decide that in this trial. He left it wide open for appeals though.

 

[archives]

Not "all" politicians. Waters in particular. He made that quite clear. I am surprised CNN actually reported it. "

(CNN)The judge overseeing former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin's trial in the death of George Floyd said Monday that Rep. Maxine Waters' comments could be grounds for appealing a verdict in the trial.
"I'll give you that Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned," Judge Peter Cahill told defense attorney Eric Nelson on Monday.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/19/politics/judge-derek-chauvin-maxine-waters-mistrial-appeal/index.html

Unlike your favorite sources, CNN covered the trial live, his comments were part of the trial as it was shown on CNN, so once again your lack of knowledge exposes itself

 

[Drummie123]

That's what I said.

The headline writer at Drudge Report showed his stuff with this headline.

"GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY"

 

[Sirthinksalot]

You should be used to it by now.

You beat me to it!