Conservatives love freedom but:
They want to tell people who they can marry
they want to control your bedroom activities
They want to keep medicine away from you
They want to stop scientific investigation
They want to stop you from controlling your own life
They want to stop you from forming a union
They want to teach their religion in schools
They want to invade other countries to make them like them
and on and on....
They wouldn't know freedom if they fell over over it.
LOL. What a list of pure unadulterated bullshit.
Marriage: first of all, there have always been, and always will be limitations on who people are allowed to marry. Or do you propose allowing men to marry their own daughters? Of course you don't want that kind of thing going on. But you pull this kind of broad label because you have nothing else but lies to support your arguments.
Also, marriage was a RELIGIOUS institution LONG before there was anything even remotely resembling modern government. Religions have every right to define their own institutions, while government has ZERO business telling religion what they must accept.
Care to name exactly what bedroom activities are being targeted by those you call conservatives? (And try to remember your target was libertarians, whom you label as conservative) You want to have a dick up your ass, go right ahead. Want to do it to a cat, don't let the SPCA know, but most conservatives don't give a crap what you do.
Let me guess which "medicine" conservative don;t want people to have. Has to do with killing unborn children, doesn't it? You cannot be HONEST and name the specific, can you? Gotta make it seem like a big huge, broad scope infringement. Liar.
Most of the rest of your list is the same. Lies based on single concepts which involve a larger controversial issue.
Stop people from forming a union? Not on your life. You have the first amendment protecting your right to associate and assemble as you see fit. What we oppose is using the law to give your assembly special protections, resulting in undue authority.
Teaching religion in the classrooms? How is that "anti-freedom"? Is there a call for teaching religion INSTEAD of the current curriculum, or is it in addition to the current curriculum? Which is the more restrictive (ie: anti-freedom): a policy that allows full discourse of ideas, even those that cannot be defined as valid science, or a policy that limits the discourse to only those ideas approved of by the State?
Invading other countries: shall we go through history and examine who is responsible for more unnecessary foreign warfare?
In short your arguments are completely false, and rather pitifully so.
BTW: those who claim the modern title of "conservative" in the United States are, in actuality, of the liberal philosophy that formed this nation. Mindless driveling shitheaps such as yourself have corrupted the term liberal so badly there is no alternative left but for us to label ourselves differently.
