Hunter Biden should be charged for lying on his gun application

Underdog

Not Like You
Hunter Biden should be charged for lying on his gun application


https://nypost.com/2021/03/29/hunter-biden-should-be-charged-for-lying-on-gun-application/


It is a very misleading argument. Hunter, after all, did not “lie and try.” He got the gun. If he withheld a drug abuse problem that he was required to disclose, that isn’t lying and trying; it’s lying and succeeding.

The purpose of the law is to prevent lethal weapons from falling into the hands of people who are unstable or dangerous. Thus, some of the disqualifications deal with criminal and similarly suspect behavior, such as prior convictions and dishonorable discharge from the armed forces, while others deal with conditions of instability and mental disturbance, such as narcotics abuse and mental-disability adjudications.

And notice what happened in Hunter’s case. He did not reveal his history of drug abuse, he got the gun, and he handled it negligently, to the point, according to reports, that his then-girlfriend found it in a car and carelessly sought to dispose of it in the trash bin of a
local store — obviously, because she was concerned about the dangerous potential of his having it.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++





Will any of our left wing friends, the ones who won't avoid this thread like the plague like to explain why he shouldn't be charged with lying on a firearms form?
 
Trump made Hunter lie.

Hunter was so worried that Trump was going to steal his cocaine & prostitutes that for the first time EVER, he lied.

But see, when deranged DemoKKKrats break gun laws, DemoKKKrats don't care.

DemoKKKrats: The greatest danger to the country & world since Nazi Germany
 
Hunter Biden should be charged for lying on his gun application


https://nypost.com/2021/03/29/hunter-biden-should-be-charged-for-lying-on-gun-application/


It is a very misleading argument. Hunter, after all, did not “lie and try.” He got the gun. If he withheld a drug abuse problem that he was required to disclose, that isn’t lying and trying; it’s lying and succeeding.

The purpose of the law is to prevent lethal weapons from falling into the hands of people who are unstable or dangerous. Thus, some of the disqualifications deal with criminal and similarly suspect behavior, such as prior convictions and dishonorable discharge from the armed forces, while others deal with conditions of instability and mental disturbance, such as narcotics abuse and mental-disability adjudications.

And notice what happened in Hunter’s case. He did not reveal his history of drug abuse, he got the gun, and he handled it negligently, to the point, according to reports, that his then-girlfriend found it in a car and carelessly sought to dispose of it in the trash bin of a
local store — obviously, because she was concerned about the dangerous potential of his having it.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++





Will any of our left wing friends, the ones who won't avoid this thread like the plague like to explain why he shouldn't be charged with lying on a firearms form?

I agree but he wont be big daddy joe and the secret service are protecting him
 
Isn't it fucking amazine? it's like hunter biden could have mowed down a black church with an ak-47 and these same liberal douchebags would pretend never to have seen it.
 
Hunter Biden should be charged for lying on his gun application


https://nypost.com/2021/03/29/hunter-biden-should-be-charged-for-lying-on-gun-application/


It is a very misleading argument. Hunter, after all, did not “lie and try.” He got the gun. If he withheld a drug abuse problem that he was required to disclose, that isn’t lying and trying; it’s lying and succeeding.

The purpose of the law is to prevent lethal weapons from falling into the hands of people who are unstable or dangerous. Thus, some of the disqualifications deal with criminal and similarly suspect behavior, such as prior convictions and dishonorable discharge from the armed forces, while others deal with conditions of instability and mental disturbance, such as narcotics abuse and mental-disability adjudications.

And notice what happened in Hunter’s case. He did not reveal his history of drug abuse, he got the gun, and he handled it negligently, to the point, according to reports, that his then-girlfriend found it in a car and carelessly sought to dispose of it in the trash bin of a
local store — obviously, because she was concerned about the dangerous potential of his having it.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Will any of our left wing friends, the ones who won't avoid this thread like the plague like to explain why he shouldn't be charged with lying on a firearms form?

Bagman didn't get a "dishonorable discharge." He was dismissed from naval service as he was an officer. Exactly what that translates to varies depending on the legal proceedings used against him. It could include being the equivalent of a felony and making him ineligible to own or buy a firearm. This depends on what method was used to dismiss him. This is an ongoing problem with firearms background checks. The military doesn't always make the necessary paperwork available to civilian authorities when they discharge someone for disciplinary reasons, particularly officers. The exact level of offense isn't always clearly stated in such actions either.

Clearly his failure to disclose his ongoing drug use on the background check form was a chargeable offense.
 
Bagman didn't get a "dishonorable discharge." He was dismissed from naval service as he was an officer. Exactly what that translates to varies depending on the legal proceedings used against him. It could include being the equivalent of a felony and making him ineligible to own or buy a firearm. This depends on what method was used to dismiss him. This is an ongoing problem with firearms background checks. The military doesn't always make the necessary paperwork available to civilian authorities when they discharge someone for disciplinary reasons, particularly officers. The exact level of offense isn't always clearly stated in such actions either.

Clearly his failure to disclose his ongoing drug use on the background check form was a chargeable offense.



on the nics form, it asks about drug addiction as well.
 
Back
Top