No evidence of Sedition

https://thepostmillennial.com/doj-admits-theres-little-evidence-to-support-jan-6-sedition-charges/

As the trials get underway for those who participated in the Capitol riot of Jan. 6, it turns out that the charges against these defendants are not as serious as the public was initially led to believe. The Department of Justice has since said that a portion of the evidence is not actually quite as damning as was previously believed.

Reuters reports that none of those 400 who have been charged have been charged with sedition, which would be an incitement of rebellion. Instead, the most serious charge brought against any of the defendants has been assault. Two of the men who were charged with assault on Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick used bear spray in the attack.

Others have been charged with conspiracy, and obstruction. While five people lost their lives during the riot, only one was killed with a weapon, and that was Ashli Babbit, who died after being shot by an unnamed Capitol Police Officer. Sicknick was assaulted with bear spray, but died some time later and a cause of death has not been released. The other three suffered medical emergencies.

Michael Ferrara, an attorney with Kaplan Hecker & Fink, LLP, who was formerly a federal prosecutor, said that if it becomes clear that prosecutors overreached, engaged in hyperbole, of simply misunderstood social media and text messages, it would be no "small error."

In fact, Ferrara said, the prosecutors' zealotry could "color the way the judge see the case going forward," which would impact outcomes for defendants.

It was widely pushed in media after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot that those who engaged in the activity of disrupting congress were armed and violent and that senators and representatives feared for their lives. However, the investigation into the actions of that day have revealed that no one was armed with a fire arm, and the most egregious assault charges are against men who were armed with bear spray.
 
https://thepostmillennial.com/doj-admits-theres-little-evidence-to-support-jan-6-sedition-charges/

As the trials get underway for those who participated in the Capitol riot of Jan. 6, it turns out that the charges against these defendants are not as serious as the public was initially led to believe. The Department of Justice has since said that a portion of the evidence is not actually quite as damning as was previously believed.

Reuters reports that none of those 400 who have been charged have been charged with sedition, which would be an incitement of rebellion. Instead, the most serious charge brought against any of the defendants has been assault. Two of the men who were charged with assault on Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick used bear spray in the attack.

Others have been charged with conspiracy, and obstruction. While five people lost their lives during the riot, only one was killed with a weapon, and that was Ashli Babbit, who died after being shot by an unnamed Capitol Police Officer. Sicknick was assaulted with bear spray, but died some time later and a cause of death has not been released. The other three suffered medical emergencies.

Michael Ferrara, an attorney with Kaplan Hecker & Fink, LLP, who was formerly a federal prosecutor, said that if it becomes clear that prosecutors overreached, engaged in hyperbole, of simply misunderstood social media and text messages, it would be no "small error."

In fact, Ferrara said, the prosecutors' zealotry could "color the way the judge see the case going forward," which would impact outcomes for defendants.

It was widely pushed in media after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot that those who engaged in the activity of disrupting congress were armed and violent and that senators and representatives feared for their lives. However, the investigation into the actions of that day have revealed that no one was armed with a fire arm, and the most egregious assault charges are against men who were armed with bear spray.
Aren’t these the minor players being charged first?
 
first off, sure there is evidence of it. maybe you need to read the legal definition of sedition-

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

they seized control of the capitol by force. and other property therein. they have admitted, many of them, their goal was to overturn the election results that all 50 states had certified to.

slam dunk.

next question.
 
first off, sure there is evidence of it. maybe you need to read the legal definition of sedition-

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

they seized control of the capitol by force. and other property therein. they have admitted, many of them, their goal was to overturn the election results that all 50 states had certified to.

slam dunk.

next question.

you should have a talk with the DOJ and AG.........make sure they're doing their jobs to your satisfaction ROFL
 
still holding out hope that they haven't found the major players yet?????

They have identified most of them and the major player was impeached back in January, and they are still looking at charging more.

Do not be surprised if some are charged with sedition, but even those that are not are facing serious charges that could land them in prison for a long time.
 
Last edited:
What Democrats have sold as a MOAB being dropped will end up as a dry little popcorn fart. A squeaker. :laugh: This is why I cant take any of Dutches posts serious. They are for the most part absurd and ridiculous. I TRULY hope he doesnt believe his own posts on the subject as that would make the man insane.
 
What Democrats have sold as a MOAB being dropped will end up as a dry little popcorn fart. A squeaker. :laugh: This is why I cant take any of Dutches posts serious. They are for the most part absurd and ridiculous. I TRULY hope he doesnt believe his own posts on the subject as that would make the man insane.

so........a nothing burger? there is no 'there', there?????
 
give me a quote by the judge saying sedition charges will not be brought

it's you with a reading comprehension problem

is the investigation over yet?
 
Back
Top