the AR-15 follies: Here we go again!

Incredibly rare. Half are suicides; cars kill more, but Nazi Democrats don't care. Nazi Democrat CovidScam caused.

Incredibly. Yup. Nope. Nope.

Ah, the massively stupid car analogy. Always a fallback for the ignorant. And you are certainly that.
 
Good to see proof you're a hypocrite. SOP for Democrats.

Some guns are sporting goods in the category of golf clubs and cricket bats or collector items like rare coins and stamps.
Some guns [like AR15s] have no legitimate civilian purpose.

Dubya admitted that conservatives don't do nuance, so that seems to be our problem here.
 
We’re talking about the US, DU.
I know. You seemed confused on "skinny" vs. "hungry". Since no one is starving to death in America, I had to go abroad.

In fact, I've had to reevaluate my entire perception of your cognitive abilities ever since we started talking about the Democratic obsession with guns versus saving lives.

BTW, the next time you or some other Democratic gun-grabber starts bringing Europe, Canada or Australia into a US gun law conversation, I'll try to remember your quote. :thup:
 
Some guns are sporting goods in the category of golf clubs and cricket bats or collector items like rare coins and stamps.
Some guns [like AR15s] have no legitimate civilian purpose.

Dubya admitted that conservatives don't do nuance, so that seems to be our problem here.

Bullshit, neef. Where are you to decide how many guns, cars, swimming pools or computers a person can have or serve a "legitimate civilian purpose"? That's a purely Totalitarian Socialist ideology.
 
The fact you don't understand the fundamental differences of murder vs. suicide indicates a disconnect from legal reality and human rights.

Do you support assisted suicide? Pulling the plug on "vegetative state"? If you do, then you are a hypocrite.

I understand fully the difference between the two. In my life, I’ve been involved with both and seen the human tragedy in both.

Controlled, physician assisted end-of-life decisions for people who are terminally ill or in vegetative states are entirely different than the type of suicides we’re talking about. If you don’t see the difference, you’re not very bright.
 
I’ve seen suicides with that very weapon. Jethro. One shot. That’s all that was needed. Very efficient. Not for self defense, mind you, but for offing oneself? Absolutely!

That's the point. If the person had hung themselves, you wouldn't give a shit.
 
I know. You seemed confused on "skinny" vs. "hungry". Since no one is starving to death in America, I had to go abroad.

In fact, I've had to reevaluate my entire perception of your cognitive abilities ever since we started talking about the Democratic obsession with guns versus saving lives.

BTW, the next time you or some other Democratic gun-grabber starts bringing Europe, Canada or Australia into a US gun law conversation, I'll try to remember your quote. :thup:

I didn’t initiate the post about skinny and hungry. One of your idiot friends did. I merely responded to it.
 
I understand fully the difference between the two.
Obviously not since you equate them.

Controlled, physician assisted end-of-life decisions for people who are terminally ill or in vegetative states are entirely different than the type of suicides we’re talking about. If you don’t see the difference, you’re not very bright.
Controlled? As in Federal authorities determining who can commit suicide and who can't? You should join the Republican Party. You both think alike.
 
I don’t pray. Useless practice other than to make one feel good about themselves.

Fiscal reality? Depends one’s priorities all right. I’d love to see an effort to minimize those 40,000 unnecessary deaths, wouldn’t you? Versus tax cuts for the wealthy or bloated military spending.
Exactly my point.

I'd love to see you attack the problem of suicide with the same vigor you are attacking my 20 round magazine. ;)
 
If that would help, why not?

Am I supposed to champion your issues or mine?

I think that we've already agreed that we're not on the same side, right?

so you seek to disarm your opponents using government as your weapon, whether it's peaceful submission or violent conquest doesn't matter. you see now why we will not give them up and will probably end up fighting over it, right?
 
so you seek to disarm your opponents using government as your weapon, whether it's peaceful submission or violent conquest doesn't matter. you see now why we will not give them up and will probably end up fighting over it, right?

Certainly a possibility. There, we agree on at least something.
Now we can move on to baseball or whatever.
 
Back
Top