The felons from Jan 6 should never legally carry a gun again.

Chelsea Clinton went to college.

You didn't.

You went into the military, then leveraged that experience in the private sector when you left the Marines.

So you owe your private sector employment to your government handout.

again, wanting something to be your truth, doesn't make it the truth.
 
Really? Because according to Gallup, the people most satisfied with their health care plans are those on the VA, while those on private sector plans are least satisfied:

Americans With Government Health Plans Most Satisfied
Americans' satisfaction with the way the healthcare system works for them varies by the type of insurance they have. Satisfaction is highest among those with veterans or military health insurance, Medicare and Medicaid, and is lower among those with employer-paid and self-paid insurance.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/186527/americans-government-health-plans-satisfied.aspx

And this was from 2015, when y'all were at the height of your anti-Obamacare horseshit.
my circle of Marine brothers says different. but you'll believe anything over me, so i'm not going to argue about it

Also, an insurance plan is not health care...it's just access to health care.
now I can add how health insurance works to the list of things you know jack shit about
 
you are a fucking idiot.

No you're the fucking idiot who takes his marching orders from Libertarian losers on Reason.com

I have news for you...Reason.com's interpretation of that phrase is just as tortured and full of shit as yours, because it's the same.

You stole it from them instead of thinking for yourself because you're fucking lazy. It always comes back to that, doesn't it?

It's just a subjective interpretation that happens to confirm your biases, which is why you're trying to present it as fact instead of opinion.

What a fucking fraud.
 
But if $15/hr for flipping burgers is so easy and simple, why wouldn't you do that instead?

lots of reasons that don't concern you, but the one that should is that I didn't want to just make a living wage. I wanted to do more with my life than just flip burgers and rent an apartment with 2 other roommates to split the cost of utilities
 
why would I highlight my military training for a job that has NOTHING to do with what I did in the Marines?

Because you know that certain people are suckers for the military and would look upon you more favorably during the application process because of that.

So you leveraged your military experience to get you hired in the private sector.

So you owe taxpayers and the government a big thanks.


it was more likely the 20+ years on my resume of doing the same job I was applying for

OK, and in Year 1 of those 20+ years on your resume, did you put your military experience down on that application?

Did you leverage your military experience to get that first job out of the Corps?
 
another source:

https://constitutioncenter.org/images/uploads/news/CNN_Aug_11.pdf

"Well-regulated in the 18th century tended to be something like well-organized, well-armed,
well-disciplined," says Rakove. "It didn't mean 'regulation' in the sense that we use it now, in
that it's not about the regulatory state. There's been nuance there. It means the militia was
in an effective shape to fight."

Another right-wing source doesn't help your case.

In fact, all it does is prove that you don't think for yourself...you instead rely on others to do that thinking for you, and then you lazily post it.
 
lol, right, if you want a militia that is well trained and in good working order

Wow, now you're stretching.

"Well regulated" doesn't mean "in good working order" to most people.

You are only saying it does for the benefit of someone else's argument here that you're making for them.
 
Because you know that certain people are suckers for the military and would look upon you more favorably during the application process because of that.

So you leveraged your military experience to get you hired in the private sector.

So you owe taxpayers and the government a big thanks.
your delusions and fantasies are not reality. they are just making you FEEL better about your own inadequacies

OK, and in Year 1 of those 20+ years on your resume, did you put your military experience down on that application?

Did you leverage your military experience to get that first job out of the Corps?

do you think having my entire career history is somehow going to prove you right? its not. in year 1 out of the service I got a job working at a pet store. they didn't even ask about prior military. what is it about your warped psyche that refuses to let you accept things like i've told you?
 
1. Not my sole interpretation

Oh right...it's not your interpretation at all.

It's someone else's that confirms your inherent biases so you think that it's the historical meaning of the word, instead of having to admit you're full of shit and don't think for yourself.
 
most applications ask if you're a veteran but I imagine you'll now use that as proof that government got me the job.

So when those applications ask that, what do you do?


My marine corps experience is not on my resume.

I find that hard to believe since you have no education, no college, not even an Associate's degree.

You're not telling me something here...I can't shake this feeling that you're not being entirely truthful with me.
 
so your hatred and cynicism, plus your own lack of being able to accomplish something without an education leads you to believe that nobody else can either, so you want proof of someone being able to do that..........which is super stupid to ask unless you want to view my personal resume with 20 years experience in computer networking

That would satisfy my suspicions, sure.

But it wouldn't satisfy my suspicions that you leaned on your military experience for your first job out of the Corps.


what a bogus hypothetical. why is it difficult for you to grasp the workings of government?

Well that's what you're saying...you're saying that the military is hampered by civilian control, which is why they've done such a piss-poor job of defending this country the last 20-50 years.
 
No you're the fucking idiot who takes his marching orders from Libertarian losers on Reason.com

I have news for you...Reason.com's interpretation of that phrase is just as tortured and full of shit as yours, because it's the same.

You stole it from them instead of thinking for yourself because you're fucking lazy. It always comes back to that, doesn't it?

It's just a subjective interpretation that happens to confirm your biases, which is why you're trying to present it as fact instead of opinion.

What a fucking fraud.




1. I think reason is not libertarian enough, they back democrats too much, lie#41
2. it's not reasons interpretation, it's constitutional scholar's interpretations, lie #42
3. I stole nothing. Lie #43
4. I am no fraud lie #44


It is the historical meaning of the word not an interpretation, please show me evidence it meant regulations. now watch as you fail.



LV426 LIE COUNTER 44 lies in 12 posts.
 
So when those applications ask that, what do you do?
answer truthfully, of course. its going to come up when they do the background check, so lying on the application would be a sure way to not get hired. how do you not know these things?

I find that hard to believe since you have no education, no college, not even an Associate's degree.

You're not telling me something here...I can't shake this feeling that you're not being entirely truthful with me.

that's your problem for not believing that people can learn enough from reading a book and working the job, like on the job training.

I built my first computer by reading a book after my regular job. I turned that in to a tech support job. I turned that in to a windows system admin job. I turned that in to network engineering job. most people my age did it this way.
 
my circle of Marine brothers says different.t

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT WHEN I SAY HOW YOU DEVOLVE THREADS INTO ANECDOTES BECAUSE YOU LACK CREDIBILITY ALONG THE FACTS

Every single one of you frauds does this....it is a habit and it's precisely why I always demand proof of anecdotes.

The facts don't align with the spin you're doing, so you just make up a bunch of personal shit that confirms your biases, knowing there's no way to verify any of it.

No one buys this shit anymore.

I find it deeply insulting, condescending, and disrespectful...so if you want to know why I treat you so poorly here, it's specifically because of this bullshit.

When you lie like this, it sends the message that you hold so much contempt for the truth and for anyone who dares oppose you, that you will literally create imaginary people to confirm the biases you have that the facts do not.
 
That would satisfy my suspicions, sure.

But it wouldn't satisfy my suspicions that you leaned on your military experience for your first job out of the Corps.
because pet stores are all about ones military experience LOL

Well that's what you're saying...you're saying that the military is hampered by civilian control, which is why they've done such a piss-poor job of defending this country the last 20-50 years.
ROFL........i'm trying really really hard to understand that you're this ignorant because you didn't serve.......the military was created by civilians, its funded by civilians, the oath of service is to the constitution and following the orders of the commander in chief. this country is built on we the people being in charge, not they the military. the military branches can only do what they are told by civilians in charge. if that is a concept you are unable to grasp, nothing else will ever make sense to you and you will always be wrong about everything
 
Back
Top