The felons from Jan 6 should never legally carry a gun again.

fucking pointless. stay mired in your delusions and anger. NOBODY can teach you whats real.

LMAO!

So you said one thing that was completely fucking wrong, I showed you how you're completely fucking wrong, and instead of being an adult and admitting your mistake, you dig your heels in further and dismiss the thing you demanded I provide you in the first fucking place.

This is why I don't show you respect. This shitty behavior. These shitty habits.

Every time I think maybe I can respect you, you come back with this bullshit that is so fucking transparent.

Tax cuts are why we have deficits today.

I even showed you explicitly how the tax cut took a surplus that could have paid off the debt by 2010, and turned it into record deficits that doubled the debt by 2009.
 
complete assumption. My current career has nothing to do whatsoever with what I learned in the military. I had no college tuition, didn't go to college after my service. I taught myself everything I do for my job. government had nothing to do with it

No, it's the truth.

I bet the reason you were hired for the position you have today was because of the military experience on your CV.

I bet you highlighted that experience on your resume, and talked about that experience in the interview.

I don't believe that you would have applied for a job and NOT put that experience down on the application.

A good test to find out what makes you hirable would be to see if you could even get your foot in the door without putting that military experience down on your resume/application. Cuz I bet that's why you got a callback.
 
You're telling me the skills you were trained while in the Marines are not skills that transferred to private sector employment?
correct. tower air traffic control and financial market network load balancing have nothing in common

Probably leaning on what you learned in the Corps. Otherwise, it doesn't make sense.
of course it doesn't make sense to you. You can't fathom the possibility that people can be smart enough to teach themselves something.

I'd like to point out that in no response of yours have you ever said that the military's job is to protect the country.
you are in error. I said they have to be ORDERED by civilians, i.e. POTUS. they are not legally allowed to act on their own. another concept you can't seem to acknowledge
 
correct. tower air traffic control and financial market network load balancing have nothing in common

So then you left off your military experience on your resume and application for this "job"?


of course it doesn't make sense to you. You can't fathom the possibility that people can be smart enough to teach themselves something.

When it comes to personal given circumstances on anonymous message boards, which you have devolved this thread into, I usually would expect you to prove them but I know you won't.


you are in error. I said they have to be ORDERED by civilians, i.e. POTUS. they are not legally allowed to act on their own. another concept you can't seem to acknowledge

So you believe that had the military not had civilian leadership, that they would have prevented 9/11 or 1/6?
 
So you believe that had you not joined the Marines, someone would have handed you a job, education, training, room, board, clothes, and health care by virtue of your sparkling personality?

the only person I know of who was handed a job is chelsea clinton. What I would have had to do, just like anyone else in my highschool not being given a scholarship, would have been to attend community college while working part time to pay for it.
 
Just that...well regulated.

I am not reading your fucking mind for your lying, bullshit interpretation of what that phrase means.

How many different ways do I have to explain to you that your subjective interpretation of that phrase is not the standard, before the realization that you're full of shit sinks in?





you are a fucking idiot.


The phrase “well-regulated” was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected

https://reason.com/2019/11/03/what-...calibrated correctly, functioning as expected.


Its not an interpretation, it is fact the phrase means in good working order you muppet.
 
No, it's the truth.

I bet the reason you were hired for the position you have today was because of the military experience on your CV.

I bet you highlighted that experience on your resume, and talked about that experience in the interview.

I don't believe that you would have applied for a job and NOT put that experience down on the application.

A good test to find out what makes you hirable would be to see if you could even get your foot in the door without putting that military experience down on your resume/application. Cuz I bet that's why you got a callback.

why would I highlight my military training for a job that has NOTHING to do with what I did in the Marines? it was more likely the 20+ years on my resume of doing the same job I was applying for.............but again, I get that your limited intellect and lack of wisdom prevents you from believing that people are capable of doing something without government training
 
the only person I know of who was handed a job is chelsea clinton. What I would have had to do, just like anyone else in my highschool not being given a scholarship, would have been to attend community college while working part time to pay for it.

Chelsea Clinton went to college.

You didn't.

You went into the military, then leveraged that experience in the private sector when you left the Marines.

So you owe your private sector employment to your government handout.
 
LMAO!

That is your singular interpretation, backed by absolutely nothing, carefully constructed to set narrow parameters within a debate you're trying to force on everyone else.

"Well regulated' means exactly what it says "well regulated".

Your tortured misunderstanding and misinterpretation is not backed our sourced by anything...it's just you using what little brain power you have to try and shape a debate preemptively.

It's pathetic.


another source:

https://constitutioncenter.org/images/uploads/news/CNN_Aug_11.pdf

"Well-regulated in the 18th century tended to be something like well-organized, well-armed,
well-disciplined," says Rakove. "It didn't mean 'regulation' in the sense that we use it now, in
that it's not about the regulatory state. There's been nuance there. It means the militia was
in an effective shape to fight."
 
LMAO!

Except that "Well regulated" in that context is referring to the Militia, not the weapons.

Wow. What a fucking idiot you are.

Time to create a new sock and start over, right, because your error here is pretty embarrassing.





lol, right, if you want a militia that is well trained and in good working order, (one that can be mustered when needed), from the civillian population the right of all the people to keep and bear arms cannot be fucked with.



1. I never created a sock, lie #39


LV426 LIE COUNTER 39 lies in 10 posts.
 
the care is better.

Really? Because according to Gallup, the people most satisfied with their health care plans are those on the VA, while those on private sector plans are least satisfied:

Americans With Government Health Plans Most Satisfied
Americans' satisfaction with the way the healthcare system works for them varies by the type of insurance they have. Satisfaction is highest among those with veterans or military health insurance, Medicare and Medicaid, and is lower among those with employer-paid and self-paid insurance.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/186527/americans-government-health-plans-satisfied.aspx

And this was from 2015, when y'all were at the height of your anti-Obamacare horseshit.


he VA sucks, despite any great reviews you may have heard

Well, from what I understand, the quality of VA care differs from location to location, which is the same for regular non-VA health care.

Why do you think the care sucks?

Also, an insurance plan is not health care...it's just access to health care.
 
So then you left off your military experience on your resume and application for this "job"?
most applications ask if you're a veteran but I imagine you'll now use that as proof that government got me the job. My marine corps experience is not on my resume.

When it comes to personal given circumstances on anonymous message boards, which you have devolved this thread into, I usually would expect you to prove them but I know you won't.
so your hatred and cynicism, plus your own lack of being able to accomplish something without an education leads you to believe that nobody else can either, so you want proof of someone being able to do that..........which is super stupid to ask unless you want to view my personal resume with 20 years experience in computer networking

So you believe that had the military not had civilian leadership, that they would have prevented 9/11 or 1/6?
what a bogus hypothetical. why is it difficult for you to grasp the workings of government?
 
Back
Top