Into the Night
Verified User
But it is, according to you.
The felons from Jan 6 should never legally carry a gun again.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
But it is, according to you.
Into the Night
Verified User
Why?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Because what juror in his/her right mind would want to vote guilty for a father who protected his children using a gun that he isn't supposed to possess and use?
Yes the said father is a felon who broke a law. The question, is the law right or wrong in this case?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
the last 30 years have had judges tell jurors that they can only judge the facts and the law, according to the judge. that they are not allowed to judge the law itself. the governments attempt to do away with nullification
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Well then then only option is hung jury.
Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
Oh they can obtain a gun alright but if caught with it it's jail city sport.
IT's a very simple question, you are spending a lot of time and energy not answering the question.
Hint: "well regulated" has nothing to do with "regulations".
1. I live in the NYC metro area, live in jersey work play and have an apartment in NYC, Lie #35
LV426 LIE COUNTER 35 lies in 9 posts.
I started this, just to show how ridiculous he is, it's honestly becoming work to keep up with him. lol
According to your interpretation, but you're a flameout on JPP so what the fuck do you know about anything?
LMAO!
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
You're lying again. We've talked about this extensively. Are you afraid the Friendly Bureau Investigators are watching?
BTW, I told you that too back in December.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
wasn't afraid then, not afraid now.You're lying again. We've talked about this extensively. Are you afraid the Friendly Bureau Investigators are watching?
BTW, I told you that too back in December.
Wait a second, you said you "owned a building" in NY, not that you had an apartment there.
So did you exaggerate that apartment to mean "building" so you could impress me on an anonymous message board.
You don't own anything in NY, do you?
You're making it all up, aren't you?
I do. the apartment as I told you is on the top floor, my Pied-à-terre.
Why do you care so much, have not?
why "wait a second" We have had this conversation before:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...id-NY-flatten-the-curve&p=4278570#post4278570
Doubtful.
I don't care about the fake personal circumstances you're trying to impose on everyone here, I care about why you feel the need to fake these personal circumstances you're trying to impose on everyone here.
You can't make an argument on JPP without invoking these phony circumstances that are clearly made up and fake.
1. you do care Lie #36
2. I make arguments all the time without talking about my reality, lie #37
3. My circumstances are not made up or fake lie #38
LV426 LIE COUNTER 38 lies in 10 posts.
No, what I doubt is your sincerity and honesty because you've given me no reason to trust in either.
No you don't, because any argument you make eventually devolves into unverifiable personal anecdotes to bridge the empirical and factual deficit every single one of your arguments features.
In every case, the argument from you devolves into you sharing an unverifiable personal anecdote that just so happens to confirm the inherent bias in what you're posturing.
Without fail, in every argument and every thread.
Can you handle this criticism? Probably not.
Stamping your foot and proclaiming this doesn't make it true.
If you want to prove your circumstances aren't fake, then do so. Or just shut the fuck up, because it's boring playing the same game with you people:
You: I am this thing that lends me credibility.
Me: Prove it.
You: No.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
look bro, there is something very wrong with your, perhaps just shut the fuck up and act like an adult, stop all the lying and other garbage and debate the topics.
have you figured out what "well regulated" means yet?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
No reason to be if one isn't committing a crime such as plotting to commit mass murder by blowing up a Federal building.
Are you aiming to be a martyr? Get your name in the history books?
https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/oklahoma-city-bombing
See what I mean? We can't ever have an honest debate because you struggle with being honest.
You love to play the victim, but only after playing a better version of yourself.
Then you whine about how I'm going off topic, but you're the one who dragged us here because you have problems with being honest. I don't know what it could possibly be, but it sure seems like NPD to me.
You mean did I read your narrow, uneducated, and lying mind? No. I didn't. I'm not a Jedi, I can't read minds.