He's acting like someone else is running the USA

So you say, Anchovies, yet you failed to cite any examples.

Poor Anchovies.

“examples?” I supplied to you a whole list of examples, which I said not only listed each action but even went further to break it down by subject, can’t do any better than that, one can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it ...........
 
So you say, Anchovies. Your weak protestations are insubstantive.

The genetic fallacy (also known as the fallacy of origins or fallacy of virtue) is a fallacy of irrelevance that is based solely on someone's or something's history, origin, or source rather than its current meaning or context. This overlooks any difference to be found in the present situation, typically transferring the positive or negative esteem from the earlier context. In other words, a claim is ignored in favor of attacking or championing its source.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy

Poor Anchovies.

That’s pretty funny, your “protestations are insubstantive,” what, you got a new thesaurus. Attempting to cover up your lack of understanding of Logic with a new vocabulary

Not “protestations” nor “insubstantive,” just the reality

Not “protest
 
“examples?” I supplied to you a whole list of examples, which I said not only listed each action but even went further to break it down by subject, can’t do any better than that, one can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it ...........

Poor Anchovies.

Posting a link without citing any relevant text that might support your point is the act of an intellectual inadequate.

Even kids know that.

State the idea you had about the text (if you are responding to a specific question, be sure your idea restates the question). Now give supporting evidence from the text. To cite explicitly, paraphrase or use quotes from the text.

http://www.warrencountyschools.org/userfiles/2607/textual%20evidence%20powerpoint.pdf

Poor Anchovies.
 
That’s pretty funny, your “protestations are insubstantive,” what, you got a new thesaurus. Attempting to cover up your lack of understanding of Logic with a new vocabulary Not “protestations” nor “insubstantive,” just the reality
Not “protest

Your weak arguments are unconvincing for a reason, Anchovies.

You've still avoided any discussion of the thread topic. I suspect it's because you are unequal to the task.

Poor Anchovies.
 
You're probably right about attention whore, but I do find him comical.

Yes, but I've got no doubt you would find the fact that the so-called "Biden administration" is currently being run by clique of neo-Marxist/Postmodernists ideologues, (who are all Democrat members of Congress/ the "Deep State"), was not comical in the slightest. If, that is, you undertood what I am talking about; but you do not.


Dachshund
 
Yes, but I've got no doubt you would find the fact that the so-called "Biden administration" is currently being run by clique of neo-Marxist/Postmodernists ideologues, (who are all Democrat members of Congress/ the "Deep State"), was not comical in the slightest. If, that is, you undertood what I am talking about; but you do not.


Dachshund

Trumpet is not in the least bit amusing, I can't for the life of me work out what the fuck his purpose is here!!
 
Yes, but I've got no doubt you would find the fact that the so-called "Biden administration" is currently being run by clique of neo-Marxist/Postmodernists ideologues, (who are all Democrat members of Congress/ the "Deep State"), was not comical in the slightest. If, that is, you undertood what I am talking about; but you do not.
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:

The big question is, do you know what you're babbling about???????????????
 
Who else would publish this brain dead bullshit? They have few and dwindling choices.

I don’t read posts from that legion thing, but if by “he” he means Biden, Biden’s approval is still far higher than anything trump could ever get close to, AND as long as that “someone else” is not trump, he’ll remain at higher approval numbers than the disgraced clown.

another fake election/poll.

hint: lies aren't truth.
 
iu



https://news.yahoo.com/operation-warp-speed-alzheimers-dementia-135335940.html

The guy is losing it badly, he' s even getting the missus to finish off his speeches.
 
The guy is losing it badly, he' s even getting the missus to finish off his speeches.

I suspect that's why Nasty Nancy put together a commission to explore the 25th Amendment late last year. The bitch wants to be an unelected VP.
 
And we're "tied" with Mexico for #1-....I bet we'll hear more abut that at that first press conference....or maybe the SOTU speech....
(We should all be Very worried about the the next 4 years...)
 
Back
Top