"the party of no,""the party of never" and "the party of no new ideas."

Iraqs problems will not be solved by US troops , just like in Vietman.

How right you are.
Did the civil war take care of all the problems of slavery and rascism in the USA?

North won and all was wonderful for slaves right?
Or are we still dealing with issues from that to this day?
 
Last edited:
I have defined my stance in this thread. You were the one who brought up treason while ignoring some of my more valid points.
Yeah, yeah- you're one of the "Bush lied soldiers died" crowd. I brought up the treasonous statements of Pelosi and Reid to highlight the contemptuousness of this type of argument.
 
Yeah, yeah- you're one of the "Bush lied soldiers died" crowd. I brought up the treasonous statements of Pelosi and Reid to highlight the contemptuousness of this type of argument.

I did not vote for either one of them.
And do not really like them much at all.
Did you vote for Bush?
 
I did not vote for either one of them.
And do not really like them much at all.
Did you vote for Bush?
Yes I voted for Bush (43) twice. He was a great president and unlike his old man he didn't cow to his detractors and stuck to his principles.
 
Until the last 6 mos of his presidency when he caved in over his lame-duck session and gave dems everything they wanted.
He didn't give them everything they wanted, although I agree he shouldn't have budged a millimeter. Its gotta be difficult to deal with that sort of unbridled hatred every day. Some have even equated him to Hitler- can you imagine?

Yes he did that, but so did hitler.
It all depends on the principles you are standing for.
 
He didn't give them everything they wanted, although I agree he shouldn't have budged a millimeter. Its gotta be difficult to deal with that sort of unbridled hatred every day. Some have even equated him to Hitler- can you imagine?

I did not equate him to hitler. Just the point of standing for your principles is not always a good thing. You must stand for the correct principles or it is worse than not standing for your principles. Sometimes the correct thing to do is admit you are wrong and adjust your adgenda.


No GWB was not like hitler, although his family dealt with Hitler.
 
I did not equate him to hitler. Just the point of standing for your principles is not always a good thing. You must stand for the correct principles or it is worse than not standing for your principles. Sometimes the correct thing to do is admit you are wrong and adjust your adgenda.


No GWB was not like hitler, although his family dealt with Hitler.

OIC so if I do a search here for your posts using the key word "hitler" how many times will "Bush" be used in the same sentence?

Lots of people dealt with Hitler. Are they all Nazis?
 
yours did :D

Thank you for biting on that!! Bush's alleged butchery of the Constitution was a leftist mantra for 8 years. Virtually NONE of it coming from ELECTED democrats, but from the great unwashed masses of true believers and sycophants in the street and the MSM. Where is George W. Bush right now? He said recently that he spends most of the time sitting on the porch of his new home and cleaning up after the dog. THIS IS A MAN WHO SHREDDED THE SACRED CONSTITUTION!!! THIS GUY WAS THE SECOND COMING OF HITLER!! WHERE ARE THE INDICTMENTS? WHERE ARE THE SUBPEONAS? WHERE ARE THE SPECIAL PROSECUTORS? AND MOST IMPORTANT, WHERE ARE THE PERP WALKS?!
You on the left need to hold Bush AND Obama accountable for these so-called crimes, or else you risk exposing that you really don't give a fat rat's ass about the Constitution. Alas, the left was completely duped. You were all just useful idiots to Obama, repeating a false accusation ad nauseum until you thought it was gospel.
 
He didn't give them everything they wanted, although I agree he shouldn't have budged a millimeter. Its gotta be difficult to deal with that sort of unbridled hatred every day. Some have even equated him to Hitler- can you imagine?

The number one role for government is the protection of its citizens. George W. Bush kept us safe after promised threats of attacks by an enemy who was/is determined to harm us domestically. He deserves our thanks, but he'll only only get it from half of us.
 
Until the last 6 mos of his presidency when he caved in over his lame-duck session and gave dems everything they wanted.

You have no idea what you are talking about if you call the Bush terms a success.

It just amazes me people can be this blind.
 
Every individual has the freedom and right to fight for what they deem an injustice. That doesn't mean every individual will win each fight. If the majority are of like mind, they will rise together. If it is a minority opinion, obviously they will not likely win the fight.

The point being.... we are NOT beholden to the OPINIONS of politicians or the lawyers they appoint. If Bush had been able to appoint and get confirmed the entire SCOTUS.... would you have stood by and said, well gee... they are the SCOTUS.... whatever they rule the Constitution to mean is what it means.

Would you Desh?


If you take up arms and start killing Americans for your definition of the constitution because the Scotus didnt deside it the way you like than you are a traitor to the constitution.

That is what is being said by the cons, its what McVeigh did.

This is why I have been trying very hard to have you peopel swallow the facts that your movement is small.

Did the gay rights people take up arms and kill Americans because they are having their rights infringed?

No.

That is why no one is making reports about them.

The tax people are talking about arming up and killing Americans.
 
Hey Superfreak, i'm pretty unhappy with the tax situation right now so I'm thinking of taking out some federal employees. Care to join me?

I've been reading The Little Engine That Could as well as encouragement to gather a group that can go Murrah all over this country.

I think I can... I think I can... I think I can...

Yes We Can!
 
The number one role for government is the protection of its citizens. George W. Bush kept us safe after promised threats of attacks by an enemy who was/is determined to harm us domestically. He deserves our thanks, but he'll only only get it from half of us.
The liberals here blame Bush for 9-11.
 
Back
Top