Top military comander in Iraq, contradicts Dixie!

maineman said:
no.... you are nearly as inanely insulting as dixie ;)
Click to expand...

Can't we all just get along?:(

Seriouslt though, I think the difference between us would be that I would be for any administration if they were taking the actions that this one has. I am not 100 % behind all of their decisions and I think someone who tells ya that any admin has done things perfectly are full of shit! Had this been a dem admin running the show this way I would be supportive, If they do a better job in office fighting terrorism Im with them. I think most dems are vehemently against this administration regardless of what they do.
 
gonzojournals said:
Your problem is that your brain is too small to distinguish between Israelis and Jews. It is like saying that you are immediately anti-Christian if you are anti-American and vice versa. Stop being so stupid.
Click to expand...
:stup: I really hate it when I have to agree with gonzo . . . .

BTW -- If there were such things as Bitwise points you'd have just scored about a half dozen, just for having Dixie's "Pinhead Quote of the Moment" honors. Good thing there aren't, I suppose.
 
Sir Evil said:
"they" who exactly do you assume that we are fighting in Iraq? Oh I see, none of the 911 hijackers were from Iraq so why are we there, why would any kind of radicals be there for that matter?

I already pointed out your first post to me that you should maybe just add something of a little substance, but nothing outside of "Idiotic Statements" I can see how much you have to offer on your side of the discussion..:rolleyes:
Click to expand...



Your "they" not mine, I was using that word from your claim that because we are fighting "them" in Iraq we are not fighting "them" here!


You answer your own question, who is this "they"?
 
Jarod said:
Your "they" not mine, I was using that word from your claim that because we are fighting "them" in Iraq we are not fighting "them" here!


You answer your own question, who is this "they"?
Click to expand...
An excellent question. Just who is it we're supposed to be fighting in Iraq (now) anyway?
 
Jarod said:
Your "they" not mine, I was using that word from your claim that because we are fighting "them" in Iraq we are not fighting "them" here!


You answer your own question, who is this "they"?
Click to expand...

Ok, "they" to me, and maybe not to you are all radicals looking to kill Americans and Jews worldwide wherever whenever possible. Do I think Iraqi leader then saddam was harboring these kinds of people? Yes I do. Do I think saddam would pay the families of suicide bombers? that's already a fact. Do I think saddam would of paid families of suicide bombers to come to America and kill themselves? sure do!

Ok, so no smoking gun was found in Iraq, and even if they were it would not make this admin any more credible in your eyes. saddam was a tyranical leader not unlike the lunatic over in iran now. None of them are interested in peace if it does'nt include their perverted views of islam...
 
Sir Evil said:
Ok, "they" to me, and maybe not to you are all radicals looking to kill Americans and Jews worldwide wherever whenever possible. Do I think Iraqi leader then saddam was harboring these kinds of people? Yes I do. Do I think saddam would pay the families of suicide bombers? that's already a fact. Do I think saddam would of paid families of suicide bombers to come to America and kill themselves? sure do!

Ok, so no smoking gun was found in Iraq, and even if they were it would not make this admin any more credible in your eyes. saddam was a tyranical leader not unlike the lunatic over in iran now. None of them are interested in peace if it does'nt include their perverted views of islam...
Click to expand...


So getting Saddam, who was contained in his little box in a far corner of the world was the best way to spend the enormous resources Iraq cost us? Id a rather spend it getting someone who achually has demonstrated an ability to get us... like maybe OBL...!
 
OrnotBitwise said:
:stup: I really hate it when I have to agree with gonzo . . . .

BTW -- If there were such things as Bitwise points you'd have just scored about a half dozen, just for having Dixie's "Pinhead Quote of the Moment" honors. Good thing there aren't, I suppose.
Click to expand...
Well you would have gotten Gonzo points (if they existed) for being an individual capable of distinguishing between religious intolerance and intolerance for an irresponsible terrorist state.
 
Jarod said:
So getting Saddam, who was contained in his little box in a far corner of the world was the best way to spend the enormous resources Iraq cost us? Id a rather spend it getting someone who achually has demonstrated an ability to get us... like maybe OBL...!
Click to expand...

bingo.... the world has lots of assholes... I think we should first set out to take care of the guys who attacked us and not waste thousands of american lives, billions of american dollars and untold goodwill from around the world taking care of a guy who had NOTHING to do with the assholes who attacked us and spending next to nothing on the guys who did.
 
Sir Evil said:
Can't we all just get along?:(

Seriouslt though, I think the difference between us would be that I would be for any administration if they were taking the actions that this one has. I am not 100 % behind all of their decisions and I think someone who tells ya that any admin has done things perfectly are full of shit! Had this been a dem admin running the show this way I would be supportive, If they do a better job in office fighting terrorism Im with them. I think most dems are vehemently against this administration regardless of what they do.
Click to expand...

and please realize that I am against the actions taken in Iraq because I think they are terribly ill advised and counter-productive. I am not against them simply because a republican did them...if Clinton had done this, I would be furious with him as well.
 
maineman said:
she's gotta be legal or Dixie's gotta be a liar.... he claimed that she was out of his life for 15 years..and then nearly three years ago, he posts her pictures on his dating webpage -replete with the smarmy glamour shot photo of him that my wife laughed her ass off looking at - and claimed that after this supposed fifteen year separation, his daughter found him...they reunited... and she wrote a poem about it that is nearly three years old now.... what the fuck? did she leave his life before she was born? how the fuck can a guy have a daughter...have her leave his life sometime later.... stay gone for 15 years after that...then hook back up...get to know one another...have her write a love poem about the reunion... then have three years pass...and still she's a MINOR? What a joke.
Click to expand...

maybe Dixie is considering her mental age. Hell...in that instance, HE is a minor!
 
I love the well-worn canard that Dems are only against the iraq war, because a republican is president.

LOL

Who was in the streets protesting democrat LBJ's vietnam war? College republicans? LOL It was liberals, progressives and democrats protesting LBJs war.

And democratic voters wanted to get the hell out of somalia as fast as everyone else, as soon as clinton blundered us into an insurgency there.
 
Cypress said:
I love the well-worn canard that Dems are only against the iraq war, because a republican is president.

LOL

Who was in the streets protesting democrat LBJ's vietnam war? College republicans? LOL It was liberals, progressives and democrats protesting LBJs war.

And democratic voters wanted to get the hell out of somalia as fast as everyone else, as soon as clinton blundered us into an insurgency there.
Click to expand...

Yeah, you liberals pretty much have a 'head in the sand' policy throughout history... nothing new there!
 
Dixie said:
Yeah, you liberals pretty much have a 'head in the sand' policy throughout history... nothing new there!
Click to expand...


Yeah, that FDR, Truman, and JFK never stood up to fascists, imperialists, and communists.
 
Cypress said:
I love the well-worn canard that Dems are only against the iraq war, because a republican is president.
Click to expand...

Yeah, we never hear any old rhetoric coming from the mouths of the dems.
Howard Dean? nuff said....
 
Sir Evil said:
Yeah, we never hear any old rhetoric coming from the mouths of the dems.
Howard Dean? nuff said....
Click to expand...

why is that "nuff"???? YOu haven't said shit. We are against the Iraq war because it is stupid. If Al Gore had started this stupid ass war, I would have expected a primary challenge from some Democrat in '04... and I would have worked on that democrat's primary campaign to unseat President Gore because he would have proven his stupidity by attacking a country that had never attacked us and had, in fact, stood as an effective foil against Iranian hegemony which we can now witness in Lebanon.
 
Care4all said:
what are the religious differences between the sunni and shiites? do you know offhand damo?

also, aren't hezbollah, shiites? aren't iranians? what were we thinking, longterm, when we planned to put the shiites in power....knowing they were the same tribe as the iranians? or were ''they'' not thinking?

didn't the cia back in the late 50's/60's help saddam rise to power to fight off the shiite control?

aren't all shiites really persians and not arabs? iran is primarily the old persia, right?


i saw parts a history channel special on the rise of the Bath party and then saddam, and the middle east in general the other night and though i missed a great deal of it, i can honestly say that the middle east is a mess right now.....because of the BRITS! it is anyold's ancestor's fault! ;)
Click to expand...

I have read in several sources that up until January 2003, just prior to the invasion, Bush had no idea that there were different Islamic sects. Peter Galbraith, a former diplomat, brought three Iraqi opposition members to watch the Super Bowl with Bush. Galbraith said, "In the course of the conversation the Iraqis realized that the President was not aware that there was a difference between Sunni and Shiite Muslims. He looked at them and said, "You mean...they're not, you know, there, there's this difference. What is it about?"

The invasion had already been planned, was going to be launched in 8 weeks, and the commander-in-chief, who had wanted to invade Iraq since before he was inaugurated, had no clue who or what he was invading. There is nothing more dangerous than placing an arrogant, vindictive. narcisistic ignoramus like Bush in a position of great power. The result is exactly what we see here: an incipient civil war. We need to get our soldiers and Marines the hell out of there before the violence escalates any further and overwhelms our forces.

A note for those morons who like to toss terms like "cut and run" and "retreat", and "surrender" around: practically the first thing Dwight D. Eisenhower did upon taking office was to get our forces the hell out of Korea. Nixon was elected on a platform that included getting us out of Vietnam. Did they cut and run?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top