Why no "tea" Parties under Bush?

uscitizen

uscitizen

Villified User
Have at it ex bushies, defend your hypocracy.

Obvously you had no problem with his spending like a drunken sailor, you re-elected him.

This tea party thing is all just a partisan move and nothing more.
 
We did have a problem with "his" spending. That's why the Republicans lost their conservative base and lost big in elections. Since the next elections are 18 months away we're choosing an different way to protest.
 
Southern Man said:
We did have a problem with "his" spending. That's why the Republicans lost their conservative base and lost big in elections. Since the next elections are 18 months away we're choosing an different way to protest.
Click to expand...

So for 8 years you only protested at the voting booth, and now the tea parties are "another way"?

LMAO!!


Suuuurrre.
 
Did anyone really expect right-wingers here to tell the truth?

C'mon

There were no tea parties because Bush is a republican.

How hard was that?
 
blackascoal said:
Did anyone really expect right-wingers here to tell the truth?

C'mon

There were no tea parties because Bush is a republican.

How hard was that?
Click to expand...
Yet there were protests against his amnesty plan, effective ones.

I also believe that if Bush had a D next to his name rather than an R the same people would think he was Satan incarnate that used to defend him.

I'll also ask what happened to the protests against the wiretapping? A D comes in, strengthens the program, tells you that you can't sue and silence from those protests...

Yup. Sometimes it is partisan.

There is the fact that Obama overspent Bush by a longshot within the first month of his Administration, but we can't recognize that because Bush was an R and they didn't protest him...
 
Damocles said:
I'm more entertained by the people who "didn't vote for him" but defend him to the death.
Click to expand...

or the ones that say "this is only one thing and as long as he progresses on the other issues, i'll let this slide"

and then theres the "I trust Obama with this power more than I'd ever trust Bush"
 
Damocles said:
Yet there were protests against his amnesty plan, effective ones.

I also believe that if Bush had a D next to his name rather than an R the same people would think he was Satan incarnate that used to defend him.

I'll also ask what happened to the protests against the wiretapping? A D comes in, strengthens the program, tells you that you can't sue and silence from those protests...

Yup. Sometimes it is partisan.

There is the fact that Obama overspent Bush by a longshot within the first month of his Administration, but we can't recognize that because Bush was an R and they didn't protest him...
Click to expand...

You had a sort of valid point going right up to that last sentence ..then you went all partisan on us.

Obama HAD to spend more than Bush because he inherited a FAR WORSE set of circumstances than did Bush .. or did you somehow forget that.

Bush inherited surpluses .. BIG ONES.

Bush gave corporations free reign.

The Bush Administration LOST, oooppsss GONE, more than NINETY BILLION US TAXPAYER DOLLARS in Iraq.

Don't know where it is .. it's just gone. NINETY BILLION MOTHERFUCKING DOLLARS .. gone.

There is a long ass list I could go down that demonstrates this tea party crap is nothing more than partisan bullshit.

Is the fact that this is partisan supposed to be a secret?
 
because the tea party's is a cover for thier racist protest.
All I saw were a couple hundred middle aged white people at all the protest.
 
Southern Man said:
There were many times that we bombed the switchboards with phone calls and made them changes things.
Click to expand...

Give me a break. There were no tea parties because Bush is a republican.

There are no protests about Obama's war plans by democrats because Obama is a democrat.

Why insist on talking like children?
 
blackascoal said:
Give me a break. There were no tea parties because Bush is a republican.

There are no protests about Obama's war plans by democrats because Obama is a democrat.

Why insist on talking like children?
Click to expand...
That's bull. I've been just as hard on my republican representatives than on democrats, in fact probably more, because I expect more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top