liberal attack against conservatives

ib1yysguy said:
"Its odd that you want guns banned to stop the killing"
Click to expand...

Oh, well then I stand corrected.

But wouldn't it have been much more productive and preferable to have quoted that instead of launching off into some tirade of bullshit name calling?

The hostility gets a little old, ya know?
 
Solitary said:
I missed you saying that. Poor reading skills, exhaustion from 2 days on the road, or just my ADD kicking in.

Regardless, I did not characterize his stance in any way.
Click to expand...

You did indeed. Please see the post before this one.

Any comment on STY's outrageous willingness to murder?
 
Solitary said:
Oh, well then I stand corrected.

But wouldn't it have been much more productive and preferable to have quoted that instead of launching off into some tirade of bullshit name calling?

The hostility gets a little old, ya know?
Click to expand...

I didn't figure you didn't know what you had just typed or were unable of reading the post that I clearly quoted before calling you a monkey fuck.
 
ib1yysguy said:
I didn't figure you didn't know what you had just typed or were unable of reading the post that I clearly quoted before calling you a monkey fuck.
Click to expand...

And is any argument aided by calling someone a monkey fuck?
 
Solitary said:
And is any argument aided by calling someone a monkey fuck?
Click to expand...

My opinion is the argument ends as soon as someone starts accusing you of saying things you haven't said or making arguments you have not made. That's what Dixie does ad naseum and it's not something I put up with. I'll stop arguing at that point and it's just as effective to just call someone a monkey fuck and walk away. If you've spent any time arguing with Dixie, you know it's impossible to get him to admit that he mischaracterized your stance (straw man). You're more of a man than he is, it would appear.
 
ib1yysguy said:
You did indeed. Please see the post before this one.

Any comment on STY's outrageous willingness to murder?
Click to expand...

I have said numerous times that I disagree with violent responses to nonviolent acts. I have also said that there are times when an armed response by civilians is an appropriate act.

If STY opened fire on federal agents because of a firearm registration issue, I would not support him. I would support him fighting the legislation.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
In perhaps the most blatant political attack on conservatives in our countries history, the Department of Homeland Security issued an intelligence report that warns law enforcement of right wing extremists and radicals preparing for potential domestic terrorist attacks and violence due to racist fears, gun control paranoia, and displeasure at the economic and financial policies of the current political atmosphere. Having read through only 13 pages of this report, they used exactly 13 people and incidents to label the right wing as full of racistm, nazis, skinheads, white supremacists, and disgruntled republicans. They've even included former military veterans returning from combat and service groups as people subject to radicalism.

This is totally disgusting and the President, as well as Janet Napolitano, should be ashamed to lower themselves to such political debasement.
Click to expand...

They're RIGHT.
 
Solitary said:
I have said numerous times that I disagree with violent responses to nonviolent acts. I have also said that there are times when an armed response by civilians is an appropriate act.

If STY opened fire on federal agents because of a firearm registration issue, I would not support him. I would support him fighting the legislation.
Click to expand...

This is exactly what he doesn't get. Most Americans would feel the same way. The ones who disagree with the regulation would look at his violence as an abhorrent act at best and terrorism at worst.
 
Yurt said:
are you actually claiming only murder can cause terror?

and often, arson does kill, felony, so felony murder....
Click to expand...

Environmental arsonists haven't killed anyone, as far as I can tell. Ignoring this huge, cavernous difference between right wing extremists and left wing extremists is dishonest.

If a lefty used violence like, say, shooting a butcher or burning a building full of people he would be a terrorist. Destroying property is not terrorism, it's arson or vandalism.
 
ib1yysguy said:
This is exactly what he doesn't get. Most Americans would feel the same way. The ones who disagree with the regulation would look at his violence as an abhorrent act at best and terrorism at worst.
Click to expand...

While I don't share his exact stance, he raises good points. And it is no more dangerous than DNC's "Ban all guns" stance.

People are scattered all through the spectrum between "No Guns at all" and "Everyone should have any guns".

He is just another point on the line. Whether he would actually open fire on agents is debateable.
 
ib1yysguy said:
Environmental arsonists haven't killed anyone, as far as I can tell. Ignoring this huge, cavernous difference between right wing extremists and left wing extremists is dishonest.

If a lefty used violence like, say, shooting a butcher or burning a building full of people he would be a terrorist. Destroying property is not terrorism, it's arson or vandalism.
Click to expand...

Using violence for political means is always terrorism, IMHO. But "terrorism" has serious connotations; 99% of the time when you're talking about a terrorist, you're talking about a murderer. ELF only caused property damage, and don't deserve to be thrown into the same category as the pond-scum that is the America domestic terrorist right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top