BLM and Antifa march in DC, threaten to 'burn down' Washington

Taichiliberal said:
WHO "debunks" the ACLED report? Source please. And how in the hell does the other article support the OP when it contains this; Antifa protestors threaten to 'burn' down Washington DC
Antifa protestors threaten to 'burn' down Washington DC
".. Later in the evening, Black Lives Matter protestors marched North to from Dupont Circle. Some Antifa protestors mixed in...." No where in that article does it state that the BLM march was intent or solely responsible or were a willing part of the Antifa anarchy, or the Antifa folk were originally part of the group's protest. So stop lying to the readers.

And your little ditty from Brit Bruce Newsome is a joke....in order to buy into his conclusion, one has to ignore local law enforcement and national security agency assessments/ Also, Newsomes own "slight of hand" is a collection of cobbled comparisons coupled with his supposition and conjecture. In short, a lame propaganda piece that throws in the kitchen sink in hopes one doesn't read carefully and comprehensively (cost to a city to secure a rallies/protests is budgeted annually....something Newsome is either ignorant of or pretends doesn't exist). Newsome is naive if he thinks anyone with an 8th grade reading comprehension skill can't see through his ploy. But then again, the willfully ignorant to such biased bilge is legion.
Click to expand...



I'm confused. You're a Democrat voter. Right? (A liberal or progrssive or something "dripping wet" like that).



It looks to me like you are trying to defend the "Black Lives Matter" (BLM) organisation?



But the three co-founder of "BLM" are Marxists, one of them even "partayed" with the socialist dictator of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro (seriously) And Maduro, a mass-murderer, narco-terrorist and all around giant, f**cking piece of shit, who has turned his country into a hell-hole, is not someone that any sane human being would like to party with.



Besides, Marxism sux big time, its got a LOT of blood on its hands, brother.


Have you read the official "BLM" manifesto ? Sure enough it packed full of communist crap.



Therefore, I challenge you to defend your (sicko) defence of the "BLM" organization.



It has always surprised me that that it is still legal in America to form a Marxist political/activist organisation, or to be a member of any self-declared, Marxist political party/organization/activist group. The co-founders of "BLM" were three primitive and violently - inclined Black women: Alicia Garza; Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi. These individual are scum, and not just that, but dangerous scum. This is why, in my opinion, they should be arrested immediately by the American FBI, then trialled and executed for treason.


What do you think?



Dachshund
 
Dachshund said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
WHO "debunks" the ACLED report? Source please. And how in the hell does the other article support the OP when it contains this; Antifa protestors threaten to 'burn' down Washington DC
Antifa protestors threaten to 'burn' down Washington DC
".. Later in the evening, Black Lives Matter protestors marched North to from Dupont Circle. Some Antifa protestors mixed in...." No where in that article does it state that the BLM march was intent or solely responsible or were a willing part of the Antifa anarchy, or the Antifa folk were originally part of the group's protest. So stop lying to the readers.

And your little ditty from Brit Bruce Newsome is a joke....in order to buy into his conclusion, one has to ignore local law enforcement and national security agency assessments/ Also, Newsomes own "slight of hand" is a collection of cobbled comparisons coupled with his supposition and conjecture. In short, a lame propaganda piece that throws in the kitchen sink in hopes one doesn't read carefully and comprehensively (cost to a city to secure a rallies/protests is budgeted annually....something Newsome is either ignorant of or pretends doesn't exist). Newsome is naive if he thinks anyone with an 8th grade reading comprehension skill can't see through his ploy. But then again, the willfully ignorant to such biased bilge is legion.
Click to expand...



I'm confused. You're a Democrat voter. Right? (A liberal or progrssive or something "dripping wet" like that).



It looks to me like you are trying to defend the "Black Lives Matter" (BLM) organisation?



But the three co-founder of "BLM" are Marxists, one of them even "partayed" with the socialist dictator of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro (seriously) And Maduro, a mass-murderer, narco-terrorist and all around giant, f**cking piece of shit, who has turned his country into a hell-hole, is not someone that any sane human being would like to party with.



Besides, Marxism sux big time, its got a LOT of blood on its hands, brother.


Have you read the official "BLM" manifesto ? Sure enough it packed full of communist crap.



Therefore, I challenge you to defend your (sicko) defence of the "BLM" organization.



It has always surprised me that that it is still legal in America to form a Marxist political/activist organisation, or to be a member of any self-declared, Marxist political party/organization/activist group. The co-founders of "BLM" were three primitive and violently - inclined Black women: Alicia Garza; Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi. These individual are scum, and not just that, but dangerous scum. This is why, in my opinion, they should be arrested immediately by the American FBI, then trialled and executed for treason.


What do you think?



Dachshund
Click to expand...

Let me deconstruct this David Duke wanna be's delusion of intelligence:

1. You're not confused, you're just full of it with your preconceived notion. I'm an Independent. That means I vote for whom I think is the best fit for the job at the time (case in point, had a lot of respect for John McCain until he sold his soul to the reaganite "new conservatives" and let them trash his family for a shot at the presidency). Also, the GOP made a fatal error in not putting Kucinich (spelling) on the ticket instead of Dump. If it were a race between Hillary and Kucinich, I'd have voted for him. And yes, the Dems screwed Bernie in the California primary. Get the picture now, bunky?

2. Not trying, bunky...I pointing to the FACTS being reported by local law officials, FBI and Homeland Security assessments that 93% of the BLM protests and demonstrations were peaceful...and the ones that did turn violent had a bunch of Anti-fa, outsiders, malcontents/agigtators and agent provocateurs infilitrating them. You got a problem with that, go write them a letter.

3. Spare us all your dubious hysteria laden, supposition and conjecture "reporting'. I've already addressed the marxist thing. Here it is again for the cheap seats: https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/jul/21/black-lives-matter-marxist-movement/

4. Your interpretation, which is essentially worthless. Case in point, learn the difference between a manifesto and a mission statement. FYI: https://mission-statement.com/black-lives-matter-blm/

5. See #1-4.

6. You give an amazing display of willful ignorance and 3rd rate propaganda...also your racist rhetoric is pathetic....calling black women primitive and inclined to violence ...when they are better educated than you and have yet to display the violence inclination you slander them with. As indicated in #1-5 your opinion is worthless.

The OP was proven to be a distortion of the truth, and you don't like. TFB. Grow up.
 
Legion said:
Quote Originally Posted by TaichiLiberal View Post
WHO "debunks" the ACLED report? Source please.
Click to expand...

Two sources are cited in my rebuttal.
Click to expand...

Your links give a hodge podge of opinions coupled with "might be, should be" juxtaposed stats that don't factual and conclusively "debunk" anything.....they just don't like it and offer "possible alternatives" that they treat as fact.

Once again, you prove the legion of right wingnut trolls are on the loose....willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn as always.
 
no worries said:
Bet she is too.

Her tits are as fake as Dotard's hair, diploma, bank account and personality.
Click to expand...

1jcr56.jpg

laughing-gif.gif
 
no worries said:
Bet she is too.

Her tits are as fake as Dotard's hair, diploma, bank account and personality.
Click to expand...


Yeah, you're right. And it's not just the fake tits that are a turn-off; because I found out that's she's actually a white supremacist, domestic terrorist and insurgent as well !


Dachshund
 
Dachshund said:
no worries said:
Bet she is too.

Her tits are as fake as Dotard's hair, diploma, bank account and personality.
Click to expand...
Yeah, you're right. And it's not just the fake tits that are a turn-off; because I found out that's she's actually a white supremacist, domestic terrorist and insurgent as well !

Dachshund
Click to expand...
Agreed overly large fake tits are a turn off but hers are all natural. She's a Czech, land of the big boob gene, and doesn't give a shit about Aussie assholes or Floridian organutangs.

NSFW LINK Rena Thorne
 
volsrock said:
Black Lives Matter and Antifa protesters marched in the streets of Washington, D.C., where demonstrators scuffled with police officers and the crowd shouted threats to "burn down" the nation's capital.

On Saturday night, members of BLM and Antifa protested in D.C., where they regularly chanted, "If we don't get it, burn it down!"

https://www.theblaze.com/news/washington-dc-protest-antifa-blm

Harris supports this!

Gosh, where are the media? Where is Pelosi? Where is AOC?
Click to expand...

The usual. Ignoring it.
 
Sailor said:
In a Democrat controlled city that named streets after them? Are you kidding? Until they try to torch the Mayors house or something.
Click to expand...

Which has happened. The Democrats have created a monster. Now they can't control it. Now it chews on their ass as well.
 
ChaiLatteLiberal said:
Your links give a hodge podge of opinions coupled with "might be, should be" juxtaposed stats that don't factual and conclusively "debunk" anything.....they just don't like it and offer "possible alternatives" that they treat as fact. Once again, you prove the legion of right wingnut trolls are on the loose....willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn as always.
Click to expand...

So you say.

Your screed is a hodgepodge of opinion that doesn't debunk factually or conclusively anything the sources I cited concluded. You just don't like what they said and offered your opinion that you treat as fact.

Once again, you prove your intellectual talents are unequal to the esteem you aspire to, willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn as always.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top