you need to apologize for calling me a liar about john kerry first. then we can move on.
Fox ignored sicknick yesterday
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
you need to apologize for calling me a liar about john kerry first. then we can move on.
I think trumps quote was taken out of context. An idiotic ignorant thing to say, but I don't think and he hast stated he was referring to the preservation society not the Nazis. but Im not here to take a litmus test.
Then you believe the election was stolen, then.
If you believe there are "discrepancies" (none of which you're able to recall or name), then you can't believe the election was legitimate.
So you're trying to have it both ways here.
Pathetic.
ok you are a fucking idiot. go fuck yourself more with that stupid stick you keep wearing out.
wtf?
We didn't change a single thing about how we voted.
What happened was that more people voted by mail than they usually did, and the reason for that was because of you and Trump not taking COVID seriously.
So you don't believe the election was legitimate if you are accusing there of being "discrepancies"...by saying that, you're saying the election wasn't legitimate.
So the wheel has come full circle with you...you're just as shitty as those Republicans and Conservatives who insurrected on 1/6 because you also don't believe the election was legitimate.
You talk out of both sides of your mouth either because you're lazy, or you're a coward.
You can't say the election wasn't stolen in one breath, and then question the integrity of the election because of ambiguous "discrepancies" in the other.
I mean you CAN, you'll just look like a gigantic douchebag who doesn't know what he believes, or is too scared to share what he truly believes. I think it's the latter.
No the election wasn't stolen, but I think there were all sorts of discrepancies the media was uninterested in looking into.
60 courts looked into it. Nada. Several states had recounts. Nothing...Why are you blaming the press for reporting that?
No it's not! It's completely relevant.
Otherwise, you're saying no one should know or talk about what we did in Vietnam...just gloss over it and not confront it because of feelings.
You are proving yourself a bigger coward by the post.
Well, I think we know the answer because he told us.
So again, what are you trying to accomplish by digging up John Kerry's remarks on his service in Vietnam?
Because all you're doing is helping prove Kerry's case, and helping prove my case that you're too scared to confront history.
I'm not sure why you even brought John Kerry into this, because the dude truthfully spoke about his Vietnam service...and that truth seems to have upset you because you probably thought we righteously and cleanly fought the Vietnam War, and you are also a compulsive liar so you have hostility to truth.
Is that what you think?
Also, what John Kerry said decades ago has nothing to do with the 2020 election that you refuse to accept as legitimate.
So we can't move forward until you accept reality.
So who were the "very fine people" at the 1/6 insurrection?
What preservation society?
The "preservation society" were the Nazis, dude.
They were the same people.
"The call is coming from inside the house"
So then you lied when you said you didn't support the insurrection because the insurrection was based on the Big Lie that you refuse to say is a Big Lie.
so he's an admitted war criminal you dumb fuck, thanks for the concession.
lol coward? fight me.
Originally Posted by Bull&Terrier
No the election wasn't stolen, but I think there were all sorts of discrepancies the media was uninterested in looking into.
60 courts looked into it. Nada. Several states had recounts. Nothing...Why are you blaming the press for reporting that?
lol... so you think that the election was perfect and there were 0 discrepancies in a country this big?
You said the election wasn't stolen, but then you said there were "discrepancies".
So both things can't be true...either the election was stolen or it wasn't.
Saying there are "discrepancies" (which you ambiguously refer to and can't cite any actual examples) means you think the election was fixed or rigged or stolen or not legitimate.
Which would mean you also think Biden isn't legitimate since he won an election you accuse of having "discrepancies", but can't cite any and only refer to them in ambiguous terms.
You called me a liar for calling him a "War criminal or a liar".....
I proved you wrong.
you need to admint he is one or the other, apologize for lying to me before we move on.
And...what does that prove for you? How does this help your argument that the election was stolen?
If he says it, he is it.
Again, what does this have to do with the 2020 election, Sicknick, or the insurrection?
"You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people — and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists — because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists."
***shrug***
it was an idiotic statement but seems it was clear he wasn't talking about the nazis. and he is right, the communists antifa types on the otherside are equally bad as the nazis.
if you are going to keep calling me a liar after I have proved to you I haven't lied about shit, I'll just respond with insults from here on out.... your call.