LET US ALL JUST SIT BACK AND THINK ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED ...

Lol, so is Durham going to get them? Or is it the unsealed indictments? Maybe the unredacted FISA warrants? The IG report? Hunters laptop? Rudy?

ROTLFMFAO!!! How many bites at the apple do you want? Jail requires a criminal conviction. A criminal conviction requires a trial. A trial requires an indictment. And an indictment, it requires.... wait for it.... EVIDENCE.

Imagine you are a fair minded but committed Democrat who runs an online political forum and someone came along to post information which would lead to the legal reversal of the election?

Tell me you would allow that information to be posted.

The courts refused to see the evidence or they ruled against the President's supporters because they all share a similar malady.

They believe they can create a Socialist Utopia that is better than our current traditional systems of economy and governance, or they believe that the America First philosophy is standing in the way of something truly great, i.e. "The Great Reset." (George Soros' plan.)

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/joe-biden-socialist-great-reset-movement

What they are doing is treasonous.

So, they can block the evidence now but can they make it completely disappear long enough until the law would no longer apply to this crime?
 
Imagine you are a fair minded but committed Democrat who runs an online political forum and someone came along to post information which would lead to the legal reversal of the election?

Tell me you would allow that information to be posted.

The courts refused to see the evidence or they ruled against the President's supporters because they all share a similar malady.

They believe they can create a Socialist Utopia that is better than our current traditional systems of economy and governance, or they believe that the America First philosophy is standing in the way of something truly great, i.e. "The Great Reset." (George Soros' plan.)

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/joe-biden-socialist-great-reset-movement

What they are doing is treasonous.

So, they can block the evidence now but can they make it completely disappear long enough until the law would no longer apply to this crime?

No, they rejected the evidence. They did not refuse to hear it. They did not block it. They have no ability to do that. If it existed, Trumps lawyers could have shown it. They rejected the evidence because it did not establish anything CLOSE to proof of voter fraud. So you now claim that judges appointed by Trump are anti Trumpers? ROTLFMFAO!!! You've gotten desperate. What YOU are doing is treasonous son.
 
Today, 11:02 AM
Red Jerkoff
Verified Loser
This message is hidden because Red Jerkoff is on your ignore list.


iu
 
You just get released from the mental hospital?!

LOL

No.

I just don't place much credence in what the msm reports about our politics.

They threw off that confining old journalistic integrity thing a long time ago but they didn't tell anyone.

So most of US still believe they are acting in our best interest all the time.

Sometimes they do, but about the Right Wing and the Left Wing politics and ESPECIALLY TRUMP, (who they HAD to destroy lest he destroy them) they acted criminally. CNN Media Analyst Steve Cortes called what the media did to Trump over their Charlottesville coverage, "media malfeasance."

The media manipulated US with the news they reported and how they reported it in order to make us hate Trump.

Look at this.

A broadcast tradition: 90% of Trump coverage remains negative, study finds

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/15/a-broadcast-tradition-90-of-trump-coverage-remains/


Media Bias: TV Networks Blast Trump with 96% Negative News
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...orks-blast-trump-with-96-negative-news-n70386


Poll: One In Six Biden Voters Would Have Changed Their Vote If They Had Known About Scandals Suppressed By Media
https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/2...had-known-about-scandals-suppressed-by-media/

If someone is a patriotic Liberal, they should take a look at who is leading them where and why and how.

Most people's political decisions are formed or influenced by the media.

If everyone all of a sudden hates Donald Trump, when before he said he was going to drain the swamp, he was the hottest media figure around, that had to be the result of SOMETHING.

What do you think that something was?
 
My Fellow Americans:

See that anger and ugliness? The Left has been duped into allowing foreigners into their hearts and minds. What sane person hates their own country unless they were taught to do so by foreigners? And now they are trying to infect all of us with it.

So our justice system is now 'anti-American'? Maybe you can explain that one to me.
 
LOL

No.

I just don't place much credence in what the msm reports about our politics.

They threw off that confining old journalistic integrity thing a long time ago but they didn't tell anyone.

So most of US still believe they are acting in our best interest all the time.

Sometimes they do, but about the Right Wing and the Left Wing politics and ESPECIALLY TRUMP, (who they HAD to destroy lest he destroy them) they acted criminally. CNN Media Analyst Steve Cortes called what the media did to Trump over their Charlottesville coverage, "media malfeasance."

The media manipulated US with the news they reported and how they reported it in order to make us hate Trump.

Look at this.

A broadcast tradition: 90% of Trump coverage remains negative, study finds

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/15/a-broadcast-tradition-90-of-trump-coverage-remains/


Media Bias: TV Networks Blast Trump with 96% Negative News
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...orks-blast-trump-with-96-negative-news-n70386


Poll: One In Six Biden Voters Would Have Changed Their Vote If They Had Known About Scandals Suppressed By Media
https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/2...had-known-about-scandals-suppressed-by-media/

If someone is a patriotic Liberal, they should take a look at who is leading them where and why and how.

Most people's political decisions are formed or influenced by the media.

If everyone all of a sudden hates Donald Trump, when before he said he was going to drain the swamp, he was the hottest media figure around, that had to be the result of SOMETHING.

What do you think that something was?

You know who else had negative press? Jeffrey Dahmer.
 
Donald J Trump, successfully took over an entire Wing of a Political Party, a Religious Group, a Racial Group and turned them all into his own personal Cult in less than 4 years.

Wow ... it takes a special type of Lemming to fall that hard. :laugh:

not to mention triggering the demmycunts into cheating in an election.....
 
No, they rejected the evidence. They did not refuse to hear it. They did not block it. They have no ability to do that. If it existed, Trumps lawyers could have shown it. They rejected the evidence because it did not establish anything CLOSE to proof of voter fraud. So you now claim that judges appointed by Trump are anti Trumpers? ROTLFMFAO!!! You've gotten desperate. What YOU are doing is treasonous son.

And if you were a jurist or prosecutor and I had paid you handsome sums in some way or another over the past months or years and/or if I had incriminating evidence about you or your family that could ruin your career and lives if I revealed it, tell me me that you would not rule against the evidence as I nicely ask you to do.

The bribe I paid. The incriminating evidence (i.e. blackmail). And the knowledge that 'bending' the law this one time would not likely come back to bite you in the ass because the corrupted ruling would have the popular support of most Leftist/Liberals and those who don't yet know the media is biased.

Tell us how the ones who saw it but rejected the evidence were not 'influenced' to do so.

If someone wouldn't lie and cheat and threaten and steal and commit all sorts of crimes to overthrow this government, then they would not be in the position of being able to do so.

The truth will eventually come out, I hope. But this country has a ChiCom friend and business partner in the WH and Antifa as a VP.
 
And if you were a jurist or prosecutor and I had paid you handsome sums in some way or another over the past months or years and/or if I had incriminating evidence about you or your family that could ruin your career and lives if I revealed it, tell me me that you would not rule against the evidence as I nicely ask you to do.

The bribe I paid. The incriminating evidence (i.e. blackmail). And the knowledge that 'bending' the law this one time would not likely come back to bite you in the ass because the corrupted ruling would have the popular support of most Leftist/Liberals and those who don't yet know the media is biased.

Tell us how the ones who saw it but rejected the evidence were not 'influenced' to do so.

If someone wouldn't lie and cheat and threaten and steal and commit all sorts of crimes to overthrow this government, then they would not be in the position of being able to do so.

The truth will eventually come out, I hope. But this country has a ChiCom friend and business partner in the WH and Antifa as a VP.

Your nutty conspiracy theories don't substitute for a reasoned argument. You claim with no proof that there are hundreds of corrupt judges, election officials, Secretaries of state, and one guy that rises above it all. You sound like a kook. Probably because you are.
 
and he wasted the other half by doing the wrong things......

Yes.

Commentary Magazine
The monthly magazine of opinion. Subscribe
APRIL 24, 2014 AMERICAN SOCIETY


Obama’s Staggering Record of Failure
by PETER WEHNER


"It’s not simply that Mr. Obama has fallen short of what he promised; it’s that he has been, in so many respects, a failure. Choose your metrics. Better yet, choose Mr. Obama’s metrics: Job creation. Economic growth. Improving our health-care system. Reducing the debt. Reducing poverty. Reducing income inequality. Slowing the rise of the oceans. Healing the planet. Repairing the world. The Russian “reset.” Peace in the Middle East. Red lines in Syria. Renewed focus on Afghanistan. A new beginning with the Arab world. Better relations with our allies. Depolarizing our politics. Putting an end to the type of politics that “breeds division and conflict and cynicism.” Working with the other party. Transparency. No lobbyists working in his administration. His commitment to seek public financing in the general election. The list goes on and on."
 
See, here is the thing. The truth always gets out when the matter being deallt with involves the attempted overthrow of the United States government through deception and other criminal charges.

Truer words were never spoken as we now see more than 150 Trump supporters being charged with crimes for attacking the Capitol on Jan 6, 2021. The truth is revealed by who is actually being charged with the crimes based on actual evidence.

The rest of your post was the ranting of a zombified shallow thinker.
 
Your nutty conspiracy theories don't substitute for a reasoned argument. You claim with no proof that there are hundreds of corrupt judges, election officials, Secretaries of state, and one guy that rises above it all. You sound like a kook. Probably because you are.

So, why was there such a rush to stop the President from exhausting all his legal remedies even when there was still time that he could?

The people who you say couldn't be persuaded to act against the interests of justice made an exception when it came to trying to prevent the President's serving the interests of justice, i.e. finding the one court that would defy those pulling the strings behind the curtain.

Once the American people no longer trust the election system there goes the Republic.

And Government of the People, By the People and For the People will have perished from the earth.

With your approval.

That isn't something any real patriot would be part of.

But there you are.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top