Obama Just Like Hitler, but in a good way

RockX

Banned
Now the NY Times is comparing Obama to Hitler.

April 1, 2009
Economic Scene
Stimulus Thinking, and Nuance
By DAVID LEONHARDT

Every so often, history serves up an analogy that’s uncomfortable, a little distracting and yet still very relevant.

In the summer of 1933, just as they will do on Thursday, heads of government and their finance ministers met in London to talk about a global economic crisis. They accomplished little and went home to battle the crisis in their own ways.

More than any other country, Germany — Nazi Germany — then set out on a serious stimulus program. The government built up the military, expanded the autobahn, put up stadiums for the 1936 Berlin Olympics and built monuments to the Nazi Party across Munich and Berlin.

The economic benefits of this vast works program never flowed to most workers, because fascism doesn’t look kindly on collective bargaining. But Germany did escape the Great Depression faster than other countries. Corporate profits boomed, and unemployment sank (and not because of slave labor, which didn’t become widespread until later). Harold James, an economic historian, says that the young liberal economists studying under John Maynard Keynes in the 1930s began to debate whether Hitler had solved unemployment.

No sane person enjoys mixing nuance and Nazis, but this bit of economic history has a particular importance this week. In the run-up to the G-20 meeting, European leaders have resisted calls for more government spending. Last week, the European Union president, Mirek Topolanek, echoed a line from AC/DC — whom he had just heard in concert — and described the Obama administration’s stimulus plan as “a road to hell.”

Here in the United States, many people are understandably wondering whether the $800 billion stimulus program will make much of a difference. They want to know: Does stimulus work? Fortunately, this is one economic question that’s been answered pretty clearly in the last century.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/01/b...hardt.html?_r=4&ref=business&pagewanted=print


Yep, we all know what happened to Hitler and the path he took Germany down.

Obama told his nation that he would make them proud again.
Hitler did the same.

Obama blamed all the problems on the other people.
Hitler did too.

Obama told the people that he would use government to cure their problems
Hitler did too.

Obama has told people that the government will provide for them.
Hitler did too.

Obama has used a logo that appears everywhere.
Hitler had one too.

Hitler rounded up all his political enemies using his military.
Obama uses lawyers and congress

Hitler nationalized businesses
tick tock tick tock


 
The similarities really are eerie aren't they?

Obama's getting a dog
Hitler owned a dog

Obama is not a woman
Hitler, despite the rumours of testicular singularity, was also not a woman

Some people think Obama is a foreigner
Hitler was not born in Germany

Obama is black
Hitler was a black chap too although, admittedly, he employed a terrific make-up artist
 
Now that ain't septic humour!
Haven't heard 'charver' for years and years but am surprised to see it used by a northerner.
 
Now that ain't septic humour!
Haven't heard 'charver' for years and years but am surprised to see it used by a northerner.

:D

It's always been used round these parts, although the meaning has been appropriated somewhat by the media to mean something a little different.

I take it that my englishness is no longer as unique to the site as it once was?
(i put those little chinese squiggles through a translator)
 
The economic benefits of this vast works program never flowed to most workers, because fascism doesn’t look kindly on collective bargaining. But Germany did escape the Great Depression faster than other countries. Corporate profits boomed, and unemployment sank (and not because of slave labor, which didn’t become widespread until later). Harold James, an economic historian, says that the young liberal economists studying under John Maynard Keynes in the 1930s began to debate whether Hitler had solved unemployment.



Best caveat ever.

"Hitler was great for the economy! Profits boomed. Unemployment sank, and not because of the whole slave labor thing, which wouldn't happen until later."

That sure gives me great faith that we chose the right road to recovery.
 
Back
Top