Make Schools More Human

Proof that democrats don’t love people of color:

The annual cost per student is $12,000.
In real life without government bureaucracy it probably costs about $3000.

The median annual income of a black man in the south is $30,000.

Let’s say he and his baby mama ha four kids who they love and do their best to care for. It is expedient for them not to marry because this frees up welfare and medical asst. But it does not improve the dad’s income which leads the family into endless poverty.

If I were king, the couple would have to be married, one parent would have to be employed full time, and I would take that $12k and give it to the black family (or white, yellow, purple and green, like the song you know the thing, Jesus loves the little children), that becomes $48,000 additional income for this father to focus on raising his children instead of making a decision to pay for car registration vs food. Which we all know gets dad pulled over and shot by the systemic policy of killin blacks by police across the fruited plain.

Yea. I’m glad you lefty’s thought of that. You’re welcome.

And if the family can’t homeschool their kids they will have the money to hire a tutor since plenty of doe people will need a J O B



Blessin’s

The fact that bp refused to acknowledge the brilliance of this proves my assertion of her lack of real love.

I’m proud to say that I was spearheading this idea in Hawaii about two years ago. It’s not complicated when you love people, you think clearly on what could help


Blessin’s
 
Here’s another one from love.

Instead of unemployment insurance how about re employment insurance?

Instead of paying people to find jobs pay me. I will pay them and that way I save the cost of trainin. At the end of a probationary period I take them on full time.


Blessin’s
 
So this author writes school reformers have a strange position of defending kids and not supporting teachers unions. I see nothing ‘strange’ about understanding there is not always an alignment of interest between the students best interest and what the unions want. The irony is he says a top down one size fits all education model doesn’t work yet that is what the teachers union have pushed for.

Add that teacher's unions will protect dues paying members no matter how pathetic or terrible they are as teachers...
 
Have you noticed that newer public schools look more like low security prisons...? They have fencing around the whole thing, steel grates securing entries into them, are virtually windowless on the outside, and designed to form a secure outer wall. Maybe we should be looking at that...
 
Have you noticed that newer public schools look more like low security prisons...? They have fencing around the whole thing, steel grates securing entries into them, are virtually windowless on the outside, and designed to form a secure outer wall. Maybe we should be looking at that...

I have not noticed that. Care to use evidence, as in, cite an actual school which allows me to see the school?
 
Do you have a comment to make on the topic of the thread? I think education policy is very important for our nation.
The Democratic Party has always fought for education

And you hate them

It’s fools like you who destroy education reforms and funding
I love a good cat fight, ladies, but you are working against each other to support education, as I do.

As both of you already know, there are a lot of assholes on this forum who are against a solidly science-based educational curriculum in public schools. The result of such anti-science "education" is a big driver of today's politics be it space, the planet or American society itself (racism, genderism, all the -isms).

The article addressed a lot of great issues and solutions. More attention needs to be paid to the US educational system.
 
Have you noticed that newer public schools look more like low security prisons...? They have fencing around the whole thing, steel grates securing entries into them, are virtually windowless on the outside, and designed to form a secure outer wall. Maybe we should be looking at that...

Not in north Texas. I did notice that the high school football stadium would rival most college stadiums. Texans take their HS and college football very seriously.
 
I have not noticed that. Care to use evidence, as in, cite an actual school which allows me to see the school?

school20171110_163627.jpg


37332141961_74336014e2_c.2e16d0ba.fill-661x496.jpg


This one's a quiz...

http://schoolorprison.com/about-schoolorprison-com/
 
You only know how to be an asshole.

Blessings.

Stevie is mentally ill. All jokes aside, there are a few others who are also similarly afflicted on JPP.

BTW, the video by the HS kids is really great:

The resulting project, “Make the World Better,” is one of the most uplifting, professionally done pieces created during the pandemic. Give it a listen; it will be the best four minutes of your day.

[video=vimeo;413100268]https://vimeo.com/413100268"[/video]
 
Queens, NY. What do you expect? I suspect all such schools are at urban centers, the great American bastions of the Democratic Party.

What is your solution for them?

https://www.vanyc.org/
667515782.webp

It makes sense.

I heard when Italians from Silver Lake & Blacks from White Plains went to the same high school.

The Silver Lake Italians beat up the Blacks, and even threw a Black kid out of the school window.

The solution?
They put Silver Lake kids into Harrison schools.

You know as in SEPARATION.
 
I love a good cat fight, ladies, but you are working against each other to support education, as I do.

As both of you already know, there are a lot of assholes on this forum who are against a solidly science-based educational curriculum in public schools. The result of such anti-science "education" is a big driver of today's politics be it space, the planet or American society itself (racism, genderism, all the -isms).

The article addressed a lot of great issues and solutions. More attention needs to be paid to the US educational system.

If providing a good education is simply a matter of a science-based educational curriculum then why we do so many poor performing schools in the Bay Area and LA? Because everyone here will tell you they believe in science.
 
If providing a good education is simply a matter of a science-based educational curriculum then why we do so many poor performing schools in the Bay Area and LA? Because everyone here will tell you they believe in science.

Largely it's a matter of funding. Only 8% of funding is Federal, the rest is state and local. How much from the latter two depends on the state and locale, but mostly it's county funding. A reason why the rich move to some counties and/or out of others.
 
Largely it's a matter of funding. Only 8% of funding is Federal, the rest is state and local. How much from the latter two depends on the state and locale, but mostly it's county funding. A reason why the rich move to some counties and/or out of others.

Are you saying level of funding determines whether a school chooses a science based curriculum? Not saying it doesn’t but I’ve never heard a school say we’d like to have a science based curriculum but don’t because we can’t afford it.
 
Back
Top