Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
But you believe the earth is in danger of overpopulation, right?
Science Theologians
- Thread starter Dixie - In Memoriam
- Start date
But you believe the earth is in danger of overpopulation, right?
Depends on what you mean by that...? Do I belive that we are in danger of having so many people that the Earth will not be optimal for those of us here... yes. Do I belive that the Earth will implode if one more person is born - no.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Last edited:
C
Cancel3
Guest
We tried, but your Mom wouldn't listen.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Ummm. I was speaking to jarod.
No, I dont belive that.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
No, human beings might be endangered by over population but the Earth isn't. Nature has it's checks and balances on over population by any species. It just lets x number of them starve to death until a balance is restored.
Last edited:
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Asshat....don't take this personally buddy....and you may have been told this by others.....but we find it quite troubling......that errr uh.....well.....that you might actually reproduce.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
His Mom wouldn't listen either.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
That's not what you're girlfriend said when I was nailing her.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Jesus gawd! Thank the lord you were nailing her! If my wife knew that I was, I'd be dead meat!!!
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
But yeah. Scientists are using science to "debunk" the notion of human life having any any intrinsic value.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
How do you "debunk" or prove the notion of human life having any intrinsic value? What's your test parameters? How do you define "value"? This is logical junk, and is untestable. That's why it's pure philosophy and isn't in the realm of science. If any scientist has literally been trying to do an experiment on this, he is a quack.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
They just assert there's no value to it, because they want people to lay down and die.
I value my own life, the lives of people I love etc. That's evolutionarily adaptive.
C
Cancel3
Guest
Rather than make these ridiculous claims, how about showing us where any reputable scientist is wanting people to lay down and die?
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Do you believe in population control or reduction?
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
http://windfarms.wordpress.com/2008/03/30/earth-hour-scam-world-wild-life-fund-scam/
Huxley had frankly acknowledged the difficulties he would encounter in reviving eugenics, in light of the Nazi genocide. “Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible,” he wrote, “it will be important for Unesco to see that the … public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
The method Huxley and others devised for forcing people to “think the unthinkable,” was to replace the idea of eugenics with the idea of environmentalism. Huxley, Prince Philip, and the others, however, understood that, in their way of thinking, the two terms were interchangeable. During a 1960 tour of Africa, on the eve of the launching of the WWF, Huxley openly boasted that the ecology movement would be the principal weapon used by the British oligarchy to impose a Malthusian world order over the dead body of the nation-state system, and, most importantly, the United States.
Huxley had frankly acknowledged the difficulties he would encounter in reviving eugenics, in light of the Nazi genocide. “Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible,” he wrote, “it will be important for Unesco to see that the … public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
The method Huxley and others devised for forcing people to “think the unthinkable,” was to replace the idea of eugenics with the idea of environmentalism. Huxley, Prince Philip, and the others, however, understood that, in their way of thinking, the two terms were interchangeable. During a 1960 tour of Africa, on the eve of the launching of the WWF, Huxley openly boasted that the ecology movement would be the principal weapon used by the British oligarchy to impose a Malthusian world order over the dead body of the nation-state system, and, most importantly, the United States.
C
Cancel3
Guest
Huxley? Huxley was a writer who was into LSD, parapsychology and is hardly indicative of what most scientists want.
C
Cancel3
Guest
No I do not. Do I believe that there may come a time where they are necessary? It is quite possible.