Science Theologians

Damocles said:
Most things are better with gravy, all things are better with bacon.
Click to expand...

You sir are welcome in my kitchen any time!

Ever try savory oatmeal? Add some bacon crumbles, a little bacon grease and some hot sauce and some parmesian cheese. It's very much like a poor mans risotto.
 
Mottleydude said:
As the newly promoted High Preist of Science I thought it only proper that I publish the following Holy Ecumenical Hypothesis for the edification of my followers.

In the beginning there was Galileo who saw through the looking glass that we were not the center of the universe and that Yo, it was the sun. He named the sun Sol and saw that it was good. The people rejoiced with the warm glow of Sol upon their upturned face and said that it was good and it made their heart swell.

Then Gallileo begat Harvey who told the people, Be not to proud of thy heart for it is only a pump for the liqueor of life where in the truth shall lie and the people cut themselves and bled and saw that this was so.

Harvey then begat Newton who fell from Grace and in his dispare he called this fall "gravity" and saw that it moved all with its force and he was filled with awe.

Then Newton begat Dalton who did not see that all was made of atoms for they were to small.

Then Dalton begat Darwin who said "Yo, we are all brothers and sisters and cousins down through all the ages and back to the beginning, amen".

Then Darwin begat Avagodro who said "For you I have this number 1.6324 x 10 to the 23rd power and this number is universal and this number I give to you shall go forth and be fruitfull and multiply and combine and synthesize and I shall call this number Mole."

Then Avagadro begat Bohr who saw that all was governed by actions of particles to small to see and that they were random and that they were good.

And thus Bohr begat Einstein who saw that all was relative and the people rejoiced.

Then Einstein begat Pauling who said "Lo, but see how the protiens fold upon themselves and give us their functions" and the people bowed their heads in gratefullness.

And Pauling begat Crick and Watson who said "Behold, Look what we have discovered, the secret of life itself" and the world was stunned and shaken to it's core at the awesome power of their discovery and they were humbled.

Then the Lord of Science said "Let there be light" and his prophet, the Reverand Bill Gates stepped forth from the Ether and all bowed before his glory. The Holy Father Gates then bestowed a gift upon mankind and he said, "Upon you I giveth this black box and in this box you shall pray and find great wisdom."

The Holy Father Gates then came upon the lowely Mottley one. He placed his hands upon the Mottley one and lifted him upon his feet and gazed into his eyes. The Holy Father Gates then consecrated the Mottley one with deuterium and polyalkylated long branched unsaturated hydrocarbons. The Holy Father Gates then swathed the Mottley one in holy shrouds of mylar and polyphenolated caprolactam and upon his brow he placed a crown of pure Germanium Arsenide and gave him a scepter of yttrium oxide superconductor as a symbol of his rank and power.

The Mottley one was then bade to enter the Holy See of the CERN Super Collider where he is to officiate over the sacrifice of the proton and the neutron and declare prohecies from their destruction by the patterns and scatter of the quarks, leptons and fermions.

All Hail The High Preist of Science Mottleydude, let all bow and tremble at his might and glory!
Click to expand...

:crybaby:

GLORY TO GOD!

GLORY TO GOD!

I AM NOT WORTHY!
 
A reverence for life is not inconsistent with a rational worldview. Reverence for life does not require religion, or any kind of supernatural assertions of any kind. There's a science of life, it's called biology.
 
AssHatZombie said:
A reverence for life is not inconsistent with a rational worldview. Reverence for life does not require religion, or any kind of supernatural assertions of any kind. There's a science of life, it's called biology.
Click to expand...

To whom are you addressing this post? To Mott? The biologist?
 
AssHatZombie said:
A reverence for life is not inconsistent with a rational worldview. Reverence for life does not require religion, or any kind of supernatural assertions of any kind. There's a science of life, it's called biology.
Click to expand...

errr yeah....I know.....I am a biologist.....or more correctly I have a graduate degree in a branch of biology
 
Mottleydude said:
errr yeah....I know.....I am a biologist.....or more correctly I have a graduate degree in a branch of biology
Click to expand...


That's fine. My point is that usually those who advocate a scientific view do so to convince man he isn't special and that he should be emotionally neutral toward his own death. However, if you really beleive in evolution, you would realize that being convinced of your own irrelevancy, is a loser's mindset, not conducive to surviving.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top