Consensus ?

N

NOVA

U. S. NAVY Veteran
Scientists meet to dispute global warming theory

NEW YORK CITY - The A-list of manmade climate-change skeptics is meeting in New York City for the 2009 International Conference on Climate Change.

The Conference is definitely international in scope. Opening the conference is Vaclav Klaus, president of the Czech Republic and the European Union. When it comes to manmade global warming, Klaus calls that a myth. He is also an outspoken critic of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and says the panel is one-sided and has a political agenda.

GW conference 2009 smallFeatured at the conference will be more than 70 scientists who do not subscribe to the notion that so-called global warming is driven by manmade emissions of carbon dioxide, one of those being Harrison "Jack" Schmitt -- one of the last astronauts to walk on the moon.

Besides the 70+ scientists at this conference, more than 650 scientists worldwide have expressed skepticism over manmade climate change.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=439146

So...the "consensus" was bullshit, just like we told you 5 years ago.......
 
Dig a little deeper up that asshole of yours and you maybe you can claim BILLIONS worldwide........what a clown :321:
 
ib1yysguy said:
You don't think there are millions of scientists in the world?
Click to expand...

What in your little pinheaded brain imagines that all the worlds scientists would want to attend a conference of earths climate.....what inane point are you trying to make,.....other than you're a pinhead ?
 
bravo said:
What in your little pinheaded brain imagines that all the worlds scientists would want to attend a conference of earths climate.....what inane point are you trying to make,.....other than you're a pinhead ?
Click to expand...

Retard, reread what you posted. Seventy attended, then it cited 650 more worldwide. That's 720 scientists in the world out of millions. And somehow, using just this information, you came to the conclusion that the consensus must then be wrong.

R.e.t.a.r.d.e.d. What's it spell? Retarded!
 
And I'll ask you again...why would thousands of scientists worldwide...want to attend a conference on global climate when a VAST MAJORITY of them have nothing,..absolutely nothing to do with the subject.....

So why do you think they would want to attend...>???
Come on, pinhead...you must have a clue....

You think millions should have attended...??? really ?

Are you running for "biggest pinhead" or "# 1 pinhead", or something..???
 
Last edited:
bravo said:
And I'll ask you again...why would thousands of scientists worldwide...want to attend a conference on global climate when a VAST MAJORITY of them have nothing,..absolutely nothing to do with the subject.....

So why do you think they would want to attend...>???
Come on, pinhead...you must have a clue....

You think millions should have attended...??? really ?

Are you running for "biggest pinhead" or "# 1 pinhead", or something..???
Click to expand...

You're slower than I thought. Look. Seventy attended. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the fact that they point to a number of 650 more scientists WORLDWIDE who disagree with global warming. That's a total of 720 scientist out of the millions in the world. That's far less than a single percent. It is insignificant, so to point to it as proof that there is no consensus is totally retarded. That makes you totally retarded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top