Texas sues Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania over election fraud

[Into the Night]

There is nothing stopping every state from suing every other state, and if this lawsuit were to succeed, that would be the precedent. I know there is only one law suit. I'm talking about the ramifications.

You're welcome.

States have filed lawsuits against each other before, twit. It is not precedence that matters here. It is the Constitution that matters here.

 

[Port Tack]

Denial of history. Denial of court docket. Denial of the Constitution of the United States.

You are a fucking moron.

 

[Into the Night]

I don't have to prove there wasn't fraud by providing you with signatures. You have to provide clear and convincing evidence of fraud before the court will even entertain your claim. The court said that the "experts" were allowed to examine a sample of the ballots and those experts could not testify that they found evidence of any fraud in that sample. Since there is no evidence of fraud there is no reason to invalidate the election simply because you don't like who was elected.

You describe fraud, then you deny fraud. Which is it, dude?

 

[Into the Night]

Yes, you did. Support your position. I said that Congress cannot pass a law standardizing Federal elections. You said I was wrong. Tell me why. Be specific.

RQAA

 

[Port Tack]

No, SCOTUS cannot send the election to the House. They cannot change the Constitution.

but they will tell you to eat shit we aren't going to address this fucking stupid case.

 

[Into the Night]

Right back at you Earl. I said they could. I did not say they did. Which word are you having trouble with?

Lie. You said EXACTLY that.

 

[Port Tack]

You have no clue about statistics. Ask me how I know.

You obviously don't.

 

[Into the Night]

You're going to have to amend the Constitution first moron

No.

 

[Into the Night]

Ballots have always been counted up to a week after an election. There is nothing unusual about this election when it comes to counting ballots other than the fact that so many states were so close that the media wasn't willing to call a winner. In 2016, Clinton led nationwide by less than 2 million votes the day after the election. When all the ballots were counted a week later she led by over 3 million. Every election sees millions of ballots counted the week after the election. This was no different other than Trump followers are whiney babies that refuse to accept that their man lost.

Trump has not lost.

 

[Into the Night]

Your law IQ opioid addiction has you confused and delusional the comment was relative to a national voting standard which can't be done without amending the Constitution so I know how important it is for you to be a moron but try and do a better job of picking when you're a moron

Amendment not necessary. Congress already has the authority to standardize elections.

 

[Into the Night]

By 'on what basis' I really meant on what authority. I'm not sure what a national standard would do to help alleviate the claims of cheating. Those claims are completely unsubstantiated. They would have been made regardless of what rules were in place.

The Constitution of the United States.

 

[Into the Night]

True but I could see red states disallowing mail in ballots and blue states cancelling voting booths altogether.

They are allowed to do that. See the Constitution of the United States Article II.

 

[Into the Night]

The Supreme Court can get an assist. MHO they should not just dismiss this lawsuit without comment. They should issue a unanimous, scathing decision that puts a stop to these frivolous lawsuits.

Not frivolous lawsuits.

 

[Into the Night]

I'm beginning to think he literally cannot read.

Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

they have Original Jurisdiction
damage have been shown to other states by capricious changes to election requirements
not following Legislative intent so the states have standing

Roberts won't want to touch it ( he never does anything) but it's possible a 5-4 majority will

All that said I doubt they will

To ignore this is extraordinarily dangerous.

 

[Into the Night]

Those states have no standing or specific knowledge of what happened in the 4 disputed states. This is a joke suit that is just an attempt to keep the Trumpies on board. The Supremes cannot take it.

Denial of evidence. Denial of history.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope Austin was where the tech is so the educated smart people are there which you know leaves you out

Aka a shithole.

 

[Into the Night]

About this case? Sorry charlie. This case will be dismissed before the sun comes up tomorrow. We're just chomping at the bit to laugh at you.

To Peace n Safety: QED

 

[Into the Night]

It seems you are completely ignoring all the basic tenets of lawsuits.

No, that would be YOU. Inversion fallacy.

The plaintiff must be able to show actual damages. (They haven't since Texas gets to send their electors.)

There are actual damages. The election in these States has faulted.

There must be a remedy. The remedy must be reasonable.

There is. Require the legislatures of these States to act and choose their electors, or abstain.

No judge in his right mind would accept that the remedy to protect 11,000,000 Texas voters is to throw out the votes of 22,000,000 other voters.

Fake ballots are not voters.

 

[Into the Night]

Scotus will most likely approve the Texas case in 8-1 or 9-0 vote.

Here's hopin'. Of course this is the old football prediction bet.