The Republicans dominated nothing. The Democrats won the popular vote at all levels. The won the majority of the House elections, and would have won more if not for gerrymandering. In the US Senate, Democrats gained seats, and still might win control of the Senate.
Another fake Democrat poll exposed
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
The Republicans dominated nothing. The Democrats won the popular vote at all levels. The won the majority of the House elections, and would have won more if not for gerrymandering. In the US Senate, Democrats gained seats, and still might win control of the Senate.
We won.
Cheating isn't winning.
Except for the House and Senate races, sure.
There is no Electoral College for House and Senate races you fucking imbecile.
How did the GOP win more than a dozen House races if Democrats won the popular vote "at all levels?"
I mean, the GOP is +10 and Democrats are -9. See for yourself. What Democrats struggle with math as bad as they do literacy?
And let's not forget, all of this was after 6 months straight of you arrogant imbeciles taunting everyone about your big "blue wave" that was coming. That's NOTHING LIKE losing big in the House and Republicans holding onto the Senate.
Again, arrogant + idiot = Democrat.
First off, Democrats won the majority of the House races, which would be the first hint that maybe the also won the majority of the vote. Secondly, because of gerrymandering, to win the majority of the House races, they had to win a supermajority of the popular vote. They win races that they win by more votes than Republicans do due to gerrymandering.
I think Arminius is having trouble understanding the difference between winning fewer races than in the last very successful year, and losing most of the races. Democrats won the majority of the House races. They may also win a majority in the Senate.
What three predictions did I make?
1) Democrats would keep the House, and they did that.
2) Biden would almost certainly win. There was a very slight chance trump could win, but it was extremely doubtful. Biden won.
3) Democrats had a 50/50 chance of winning the Senate. They still have a chance of winning, but it is less than 50% chance now. Maybe a 20% chance.
I mean, you can just keep talking past the evidence already posted, but it's not going to get you anywhere.
Republicans won 28 of 29 most competitive House seats, added 3 state legislatures, did not lose a single House seat.
Again, the GOP is +10 and Democrats are -9. See for yourself.
You don't get to make up your own voting districts and insist that Democrats WOULD'VE won if the districts were different. You also don't get to just make shit up and assert, without any evidence, that all the Democrat losses were due to some extraordinary amount of gerrymandering that doesn't exist in every other district.
Which, even accepted at face value, is NOTHING LIKE the "blue wave" bullshit they taunted everyone with for six months straight. And is also nothing like the guy who didn't campaign getting more votes than any president in history. Democrats should have won EVERY House and Senate race if Democrats turned out in those kinds of numbers.
Comprehend it yet?
Last edited:
Hence the "blue wave" never happening...just like Hillary's 92% chance of winning in 2016.
Frank Luntz urges pollsters to seek new profession after Trump outperforms polls: 'Sell real estate'
that doesn't disprove weighting, idiot.
Into the Night
Verified User
Changing the Constitution is not interpreting the Constitution. The Supreme Court does not have power to interpret the Constitution either.
Kavanough does not have authority to change the Constitution of the United States nor of any State constitution.
Into the Night
Verified User
Anyone that wants to override a constitution is not 'my boy'.
Into the Night
Verified User
WRONG! Cooked data is not allowed in statistical math at all. Only raw data may be used. Math error: Failure to select by randN. Failure to conduct a summary. Use of hidden, manufactured, or cooked data.
Into the Night
Verified User
We won.
No one has won. No one has lost.
Into the Night
Verified User
The election is still indeterminate.
What judges do is interpret laws, including the Constitution(which is a law). The Supreme Court's primary job is to interpret laws in terms of the Constitution, and with how the Constitution itself should be interpreted.
In your fantasy, who is supposed to interpret the Constitution?
Weighting data is used all the time in statistics. It is usually considered important to make clear what process was used, but there are many processes that include weighting. I doubt you have any background in statistics.
I doubt you will ever accept the results.
Into the Night
Verified User
WRONG. No court has authority over the Constitution. See Article III of the U.S. Constitution.
WRONG. No court has authority over the Constitution. See Article III of the U.S. Constitution. No court has the authority to change or interpret the Constitution.
Not a fantasy. The States, the owners of the Constitution collectively, are the only ones authorized to interpret it. They are the only ones that created it, that can change it in any way, and can destroy it (thus dissolving the federal government completely). The States own the Constitution.
Into the Night
Verified User
WRONG. You cannot use cooked data in statistical math. No summary has been run yet! Circular argument fallacy. Math error: failure to select by randN. Preselection. Failure to use unbiased raw data.
Inversion fallacy. It is YOU that is denying statistical math.
Into the Night
Verified User
What results? There isn't any yet! The lawsuits are still pending. The electoral college has not yet met.
Into the Night
Verified User
Random numbers. Argument from randU fallacy. The president is not elected by popular vote.
I think the Civil War settled the argument over whether the states can destroy America.
So in your fantasy, each state would decide an interpretation of the Constitution for itself. What if there is a constitutional question of international power of the President? It touches on no state in particular.