Dominion voting machines

Trumpet said:
Law Firm Withdraws From Trump Campaign’s Pennsylvania Lawsuit Amid Pressure

Attorneys from the law firm Porter Wright Morris & Arthur withdrew late Thursday from representing the Trump campaign in a federal lawsuit seeking to block the certification of Pennsylvania’s election results, becoming the third law firm to distance itself from the Trump campaign’s post-election lawsuits and coming amid a public pressure campaign and reported internal dissent over Porter Wright’s role in President Donald Trump’s legal strategy.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...-campaign-pennsylvania-lawsuit-amid-pressure/
Click to expand...

Again..............some lawyers were getting harassed and doxed by the left wing.
 
guno said:
giphy.gif
Click to expand...

looks like guano is beginning to panic......
 
Might be true...might NOT be true. We might know by tomorrow.
Supposedly, seized SYCTL data showed a landslide victory for Trump when the info was at
the Barcelona count. The server was seized by the U.S. Army and showed that the electoral
count at the time in the computer log was Trump 410 and Biden 128. There are some who
believe it was U.S. Intelligence who manipulated the votes by the time it all got to Frankfurt.
So, if (big if) we really have the server it will be easy to see the difference between what was
seen in Barcelona and what was seen at headquarters in Frankfurt.
Time to wait again.
 
I was just thinking. If this IS true, that would explain why Dems needed those hundreds of thousands of extra ballots
on hand quickly after elections closed to make up the difference in what the server showed and what they needed so
they could materialize a lead on the ground here in the U.S.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
in states that require votes to be received on election day any vote not received on election day would not be legal votes regardless of when they were reported.......
Click to expand...

You do realize that if the precinct doesn't count any votes until after midnight that is not evidence that those votes arrived after midnight.

Unless you have specific evidence that the ballots arrived after the deadline no judge is going to throw out ballots on an affidavit by someone not privy to when and how the ballots were delivered. Vague claims are not evidence in any courtroom in this country.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You do realize that if the precinct doesn't count any votes until after midnight that is not evidence that those votes arrived after midnight.

Unless you have specific evidence that the ballots arrived after the deadline no judge is going to throw out ballots on an affidavit by someone not privy to when and how the ballots were delivered. Vague claims are not evidence in any courtroom in this country.
Click to expand...

we are discussing illegal votes........it is up to the states to prove that votes were received on time, it is not up to me.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
we are discussing illegal votes........it is up to the states to prove that votes were received on time, it is not up to me.....
Click to expand...

No, it isn't up to the states to prove the votes were received on time. Unless there is convincing evidence that they were not received on time the court will assume they were.

So unless you have convincing evidence that the ballots were not received on time the court will throw out your argument.
 
Stretch said:
Dominion voting machines used for years in Venezuela, other countries and in the U.S.:
Drag & drop selected votes into a folder.
Simply delete the folder.
Trump will win. :flagsal:

]
Click to expand...

Been debunked moments after it was pedaled, it and the wacko MIT guy who raised it, not that that makes a difference, Trump has to have a grand conspiracy to claim he was robbed, the lie of no poll watchers won’t do it, but the lemmings will buy a computer plot to beat Trump, kinda like a Trump Tower being bugged fabrication
 
archives said:
Been debunked moments after it was pedaled, it and the wacko MIT guy who raised it, not that that makes a difference, Trump has to have a grand conspiracy to claim he was robbed, the lie of no poll watchers won’t do it, but the lemmings will buy a computer plot to beat Trump, kinda like a Trump Tower being bugged fabrication
Click to expand...

Wrong.
But, Hilly could claim Russian computer-hacking style interference.......for 4 years. Uh-huh.
Patience.:laugh:
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You do realize that if the precinct doesn't count any votes until after midnight that is not evidence that those votes arrived after midnight.

Unless you have specific evidence that the ballots arrived after the deadline no judge is going to throw out ballots on an affidavit by someone not privy to when and how the ballots were delivered. Vague claims are not evidence in any courtroom in this country.
Click to expand...

Just ONE of the main issues is all the "supposed" mailed in ballots with no postage date stamp.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
more demmycrat delusions......
Click to expand...

Probably because he is describing himself. He is the one using drugs. It is, after all, Democrats that support using recreational drugs.

Portland, OR will particularly become a hive of drug addled Dummycrats to avoid, now that any recreational drug is legal there.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
No, it isn't up to the states to prove the votes were received on time. Unless there is convincing evidence that they were not received on time the court will assume they were.

So unless you have convincing evidence that the ballots were not received on time the court will throw out your argument.
Click to expand...

obviously since no votes that were received late are legal, the burden is on the state to not count any illegal votes........no one should deny that fact......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top