Supreme Court hearings...a farce.

Don't be an ass. He has been a church-going Catholic his whole life. You are just being a dick.
Trump was never in the church he claimed membership of. His niece says he shows up for church when there will be a camera.

He is "religious" for political pandering only. Like Pelosi and the rest of the lying fucks. I will keep saying it, Democrats rely on stupid people to keep them in office. You folks keep doing a good job at that.
 
Having watched Amy Coney Barrett at the Supreme Court hearings reminds me of the kid in grade school nailed in breaking the rules and then lying to the principal with a straight face as if butter wouldn't melt in their mouth.

But let's get real.....the GOP has the majority vote in the Senate ... like the Trump impeachment hearings, they've already stated in public that the fix is in regardless of the facts or evidence. So essentially, this is just a waste of taxpayer's money with the Dems hoping that public exposure of these people will sway voters in the upcoming congressional elections. Hope springs eternal.

I've DECIDED to set my Bias, NORMALLY on autopilot aside, and give AMY A CHANCE.

I realize she has strong religious beliefs, and I understand she is also a zany Constitutionalist, but I also believe that the worst possible thing she would want for her reputation or legacy is looking like some kind of a Potted Plant for Donald Trump or the Republicans Party.

So basically, she is on probation with me right now, and deserves a chance. However after I watch a few of her judgements and dissents, I reserve the right to change my positive opinion of her at any time.
 
He is "religious" for political pandering only. Like Pelosi and the rest of the lying fucks. I will keep saying it, Democrats rely on stupid people to keep them in office. You folks keep doing a good job at that.

You should stop doing that. You are being a fool.
 
I've DECIDED to set my Bias, NORMALLY on autopilot aside, and give AMY A CHANCE.

I realize she has strong religious beliefs, and I understand she is also a zany Constitutionalist, but I also believe that the worst possible thing she would want for her reputation or legacy is looking like some kind of a Potted Plant for Donald Trump or the Republicans Party.

So basically, she is on probation with me right now, and deserves a chance. However after I watch a few of her judgements and dissents, I reserve the right to change my positive opinion of her at any time.

God bless ya, kid! I see it as hope beyond hope that Barrett will turn out to be another Sandra Day O'Connor....but it would be nice for me to be wrong on this.
 
You should stop doing that. You are being a fool.

One of the reasons why I have that simpleton on IA. He's part of a cadre of right wing wonks that consistently show up on my threads and posts to eventually tell me that I have nothing of worth to say. Weird, right?
 
God bless ya, kid! I see it as hope beyond hope that Barrett will turn out to be another Sandra Day O'Connor....but it would be nice for me to be wrong on this.

She certainly brings reasons for concern.

But, we have no choice but to give her a chance.

Sometimes things are not always as bad as they seem.

But, one thing I know- She is no potted plant like Bill Barr!

She probably thinks Donald Trump is the worst and most disgusting human being alive today like the rest of us.
 
bhaktajan;4029743 [QUOTE said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
If you have the judges of any case or review previously state the outcome regardless of the information that comes out, that makes the procedure a pathetic joke.

]Supreme Court Rules Pennsylvania Can Count Ballots
Oct 19, 2020 — Pennsylvania Republicans had sought to block the counting of late-arriving ballots, which the state's Supreme Court had approved last month.

WHAT LAW DID THE COURT REVIEW?

YET

BREAKING: International election observers barred from ...
2 days ago — A group of international election observers from the European Union have been ... to oversee the ballot counting process in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. ... observers who have been locked out of the Philadelphia vote count.[/QUOTE]


1. The OP is about MEMBERS OF THE REVIEW BOARD IN THE CONFIRMATION HEARINGS PUBLICALLY STATING PRIOR TO THE HEARING THAT THEY WILL CONFIRM THE CANDIDATE REGARDLESS OF TESTIMONY AND EXAMINATION. That does NOT compare to a court review of evidence presented and a decision AFTER the review is made.

2. Reality check: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/07/...servers-were-blocked-from-counting-rooms.html

Also note this from your article,"...Perry clarified (see update below) that he is not the spokesperson for the OSCE's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, the sub-sect of the organization that is directly involved in international election oversight.
 
She certainly brings reasons for concern.

But, we have no choice but to give her a chance.

Sometimes things are not always as bad as they seem.

But, one thing I know- She is no potted plant like Bill Barr!

She probably thinks Donald Trump is the worst and most disgusting human being alive today like the rest of us.

I'm suspicious of anyone who belongs or belonged to a fringe group of any religion.
 
Back
Top