MAMA

Jarod said:
One can be kind without surrendering, they act as if they are the same thing.
Click to expand...

Agreed, which is why I agreed with both of you.

Consider that a person walking along a street and giving a panhandler money may be motivated to get rid of them, not out of charity. That's a form of surrender.
 
Jarod said:
MAKA

Make America Kind Again.
Click to expand...

I guess it depends on how you define kind. Our foreign policy hasn't been kind for decades, unless you're talking about being kind to military contractors, the defense industry, and multinational corporations.

The US government doesn't serve its public or its nation. It serves special interests.
 
Saudade said:
I guess it depends on how you define kind. Our foreign policy hasn't been kind for decades, unless you're talking about being kind to military contractors, the defense industry, and multinational corporations.

The US government doesn't serve its public or its nation. It serves special interests.
Click to expand...
nothing wrong with some humanitarianism -but where that goes off the rail is like Libya
and the "responsibility to protect" Albright endorses and Clinton latched onto.

Our "kindness" ( to protect) turned a stable regime into a 10 year civil war, and "ISIS by the sea"
 
anatta said:
you confuse personal virtue with national will.
Kindness is looked at as weakness in international relations
China looks at kindness as being a fool
Click to expand...

There is a lot of truth right there. As well as M.E. nations. Their politicians anyway.
 
Nordberg said:
NO such thing. He will just do what science tells him instead of corporation heads and multi-millionaires. it will come out as well as medical science can possibly make it work out.
Click to expand...

He will be led by whatever lobbyist pays the most. Wake the fuck up.
 
Saudade said:
I suppose. If the GOP hopes to win though, they're going to need to engage in the same tactic as the Democrats though. Fabricating votes is the name of the game.
Click to expand...

Prove there was any fabricating of votes, as if you could. Speaking out of ones ass through ignorance seems to be more of the "name of the game".
 
Old Trapper said:
Prove there was any fabricating of votes, as if you could. Speaking out of ones ass through ignorance seems to be more of the "name of the game".
Click to expand...

It's hard to prove anything when there are little to no safeguards. But I look forward to the midterms having 110% voter turnout.
 
Saudade said:
I suppose. If the GOP hopes to win though, they're going to need to engage in the same tactic as the Democrats though. Fabricating votes is the name of the game.
Click to expand...

Conspiracy theory nonsense. Both sides have oversight of the situation which has definitely been much improved since the 2000 election debacle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top