Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
In an era where we are all categorized by our race, it is in our individual best interests to strengthen the brand with which we are all labelled. And pride is not DOING WRONG, anyway.
You suck at arguing.
Frustrations of Being a Pompous Jew
- Thread starter Sammy Jankis
- Start date
In an era where we are all categorized by our race, it is in our individual best interests to strengthen the brand with which we are all labelled. And pride is not DOING WRONG, anyway.
You suck at arguing.
No, it is in our best interest to teach our children to do the right thing even if it is sometimes difficult.
This is more fear talking, willing to do wrong because you are afraid.
You are a disingenuous little bug frightened and helpless desperate to find pride in what others have done because he believes he'll never be capable of doing something of which he can be proud.
Build false pride based on the actions of others. I'll work to teach my kids to be stronger than that.
I never suspected to find such total and abject support of fearful "vengeance". Do wrong for me too! You cry out, then accuse others of being a traitor if they don't join in your chorus.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
I fear the lists are here to stay for a while, despite your dream. And considering this reality, it's easiest to put as many groups on the list as we can.
These lists with all groups but white men on them are just a way of having defacto discrimination against white men. You know it, your jew masters know it. Stop being a lying scrotum.
Which doesn't change that I believe they are wrong, and will not work towards more wrong in my own favor to assuage my fears.
Lying is saying you don't want the lists, then begging "your masters" (to use your words) to please put you on the list....
"Don't leave me out!" you cry at the same time you point and say, "Hey! That's unfair!" You'll even sell your vote to be on that list, won't you?
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
I don't want the lists, but IN LIEU OF THEIR DISPOSAL, i would like whites and men to be put on them. Do you get my nuanced position? I can explain it again if you like.
Right, "in lieu of" translates to "in the stead of"...
Instead of working for the removal of what you think is wrong, you want to be included in it. You wallow in the same shallow pond that made the lists to begin with.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
We'll have to get back to this one. I like pointing out your faults and how weak and fearful you are, and you keep giving me opportunity to do so.
Fine, scurry away, you disingenuous shitty arguer.
It's not weak or fearful to seek a remedy to racial or gender discrimination.
I've beaten you again. This is too easy.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Right. If I can't get the whole practice scrapped, I would like to be included on the protected list. I think you nailed it. I, nor anyone else, sees the "gotcha" you think you achieved.
It is not a remedy to create another super special class of extra protected tan levels.
The remedy does not include government-sanctioned tans.
"They'll get all the special stuff, please include me!"
Weak, and willfully hypocritical.
Full of fear and desperate to convince yourself that wrong done in your favor is the only "remedy" for what you see as wrong to begin with.
That's because you don't understand what "instead of working towards" actually means.
You work towards wrong, instead of working towards what you know is right, because you fear you won't be strong enough to live in a world where wrong isn't done in your favor too.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
If we put all groups on the list, the discriminatory effects would be nullified.
Are you done yet?
If we put all groups on the list, the discriminatory effects would be nullified.
Last edited:
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
How am I working toward wrong? Having all conceivable groups on the list is just another way of eliminating the list. Can you really not see that?
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Your jew masters will be impressed with you intellectual dishonesty and personal abusiveness.
Right. This is not what you propounded to me, nor what you have said. You said you want the same status that you believe is wrong for others to have because you fear you will be ineffective in doing what is right and therefore incapable of working towards what you know is the right thing to do.
You didn't tell me to work towards getting "all tans" on the list, you told me to work towards getting your tan on it.
I refuse. The government is not the giver of rights and I will work towards what I know is right.
And yours will be impressed at how effective creating lists was as you now beg them to be included on their next list.
You are so twisted you can no longer see that "they" (IMO your fears, but you can name them whatever you wish) have beat you into believing doing right is impossible.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
As I mentioned previously, my first choice is to see the lists eliminated, but if that is too difficult, I would like all groups to be on them, thus, nullifying their impact. You can try to make it sound evil and inconsistent again, but you will fail again.
If this is what you had said, I would agree that we should work to eliminate the lists, but that it is capitulating to beg inclusion. (What you said is that we should work towards inclusion on the lists in lieu of their removal).
Sometimes it is difficult to do the right thing. I'll continue working towards that. You go ahead and capitulate to your fears. I'm not trying to force you to follow me. I'm trying to tell you why I won't follow you onto that path, even if it means my fictional son won't have special treatment.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Ok. So you go ahead doing nothing while I talk about the injustice of racial discrimination, and the MULTIPLE solutions that exist.