THREE

[archives]

Love em or hatem

THREE

And Barrett seems like an awesome Justice

Stop crying Democrats

Democrats aren’t crying, rather pointing out the obvious, Barrett and Beer Ball are 100% partisan political appointees, they were put there for a particular purpose, which yesterday’s Wisconsin ballot decision even without Barrett proved

What it does is open up the door for Democrats if or when they win both the Executive and Legislative Branches of Gov’t, which will happen at some point. Mitch set the precedent, so anything is possible

 

[CFM]

What??????? The point of the SC is to decide constitutional questions. A second court isn't needed when the first court is doing just that. What is wrong with you?

He's basing his support on not liking their decisions not on whether or not they're doing a good job.

 

[CFM]

Democrats aren’t crying, rather pointing out the obvious, Barrett and Beer Ball are 100% partisan political appointees, they were put there for a particular purpose, which yesterday’s Wisconsin ballot decision even without Barrett proved

What it does is open up the door for Democrats if or when they win both the Executive and Legislative Branches of Gov’t, which will happen at some point. Mitch set the precedent, so anything is possible

In other words, you claim something is wrong yet admit you'll do wrong if you get the chance.

 

[Yakuda]

He's basing his support on not liking their decisions not on whether or not they're doing a good job.

For years the left has used the court to push their ideology like abortion and gay "marriage" so now they are pissed that may be going away.

 

[archives]

In other words, you claim something is wrong yet admit you'll do wrong if you get the chance.

That’s ironic coming from a Trumpkin, kinda like when they accuse another individual of lying, I am saying that Mitch knew what he was doing and it would be hypocritical of him and the right not to expect the obvious

 

[BartenderElite]

For years the left has used the court to push their ideology like abortion and gay "marriage" so now they are pissed that may be going away.

Those are individual rights - not ideological.

It's all about liberty.

 

[archives]

For years the left has used the court to push their ideology like abortion and gay "marriage" so now they are pissed that may be going away.

Ah, the Court has been conservative for close to two decades now so what the hell are you talking about

 

[Granule]

Most SCOTUS justices have been picked by Presidents who lost the popular vote.

That a President as low caliber as Trump actually got 3 appointments is pretty sad.

I really wish McConnell had let Garland go through. It would have made this more palatable for millions.

You mean more palatable for millions who think like you, right ButtenderElite?

America doesn't need you, comrade. Go Socialize in Canada.

 

[CFM]

For years the left has used the court to push their ideology like abortion and gay "marriage" so now they are pissed that may be going away.

Claiming appointments made by Obama (Sotomayor and Kagan) and Clinton (RBG and Breyer) weren't pushing a left wing ideology.

 

[CFM]

You mean more palatable for millions who think like you, right ButtenderElite?

America doesn't need you, comrade. Go Socialize in Canada.

Palatable means someone that pushes their ideology.

 

[Yakuda]

Those are individual rights - not ideological.

It's all about liberty.

There is no right to look babies or to be married

 

[Granule]

Palatable means someone that pushes their ideology.

Yup.

Many of these perverts don't even try to hide their disdain for the Constitution anymore.

 

[CFM]

That’s ironic coming from a Trumpkin, kinda like when they accuse another individual of lying, I am saying that Mitch knew what he was doing and it would be hypocritical of him and the right not to expect the obvious

Nothing hypocritical about the President nominating and the Senate giving/denying consent.

I must have hit a nerve showing your hypocrisy, Kunta. No one is surprised you'd try to justify doing what you claim is wrong. You left wingers say using race to make hiring decision is wrong yet support affirmative action, something that uses race, when it benefits certain groups.

 

[BartenderElite]

You mean more palatable for millions who think like you, right ButtenderElite?

America doesn't need you, comrade. Go Socialize in Canada.

I actually prefer a more conservative court - but not TOO conservative.

I just don't think it was fair play. Trump & McConnell were perfectly within their rights to rush this one through - but it's poor optics at best after what happened w/ Garland.

At best, it puts a dent in the integrity of the court. McConnell made it very political.

 

[CFM]

Yup.

Many of these perverts don't even try to hide their disdain for the Constitution anymore.

They try to justify that disdain. archives just did. He said what McConnell did was wrong yet admitted he'd support Democrats doing wrong by doing the same thing if they get the chance.

 

[Yakuda]

Ah, the Court has been conservative for close to two decades now so what the hell are you talking about

So its your contention the left hasn't used the court to make "law" they could never get passed in legislation? The court has NOT been conservative as you sim as justice Roberts caved and other "conservative" justices have not decided things as one would expect a "conservative" justice to decide.

 

[BartenderElite]

There is no right to look babies or to be married

But there are privacy rights, rights to equality and rights to non-discrimination.

 

[CFM]

I actually prefer a more conservative court - but not TOO conservative.

I just don't think it was fair play. Trump & McConnell were perfectly within their rights to rush this one through - but it's poor optics at best after what happened w/ Garland.

At best, it puts a dent in the integrity of the court. McConnell made it very political.

By what standard in the Constitution do you use to call it rushing through?

Every Justice on the Court received a nomination and a majority vote in order to get there. No one on the Court got there without doing that.

 

[CFM]

Ah, the Court has been conservative for close to two decades now so what the hell are you talking about

I guess that's why same sex marriage and the Obamacare mandate were upheld being that those are two extremely conservative things.

 

[Yakuda]

Claiming appointments made by Obama (Sotomayor and Kagan) and Clinton (RBG and Breyer) weren't pushing a left wing ideology.

No of course not they were purely objective. Not like the mean conservative justices.