I will ask again

Joe Hiden said:
JPP leftists don’t appear to be very confident in Hiden Biden
Click to expand...

They know he's senile.

That' why the DEMOCRATS are hidin' Biden.

If he shows up for the debate, JPP leftists will declare the old fool the "winner" no matter what happens, won't they?
 
Legion said:
I don't trust DEMOCRAT election officials because of things like this:

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/oakland-county/2020/06/12/southfield-clerk-go-trial-six-felony-charges/5346760002/
Click to expand...

Hmm, guess I should be distrustful of all repub postal workers because of this.

A mail carrier in West Virginia pled guilty to changing the party registration on eight absentee ballot requests from Democratic to Republican.

The AP reported:

Thomas Cooper entered the plea in federal court in Elkins to attempted election fraud and injury to the mail, U.S. Attorney Bill Powell said in a statement. Cooper was charged in May after eight mail-in requests for absentee voter ballots had their party affiliations altered.

According to the affidavit, when he was then asked about the other requests, Cooper said, “I’m not saying no,” but if the requests were picked up along his postal route, “I would take the blame.” Cooper was then asked if he was “just being silly” and he replied he did it “as a joke” and that he didn’t know those voters.

Cooper offered up the now standard, I was kidding when I committed a felony that has become a favorite excuse of Trump supporters.

https://www.politicususa.com/2020/07/10/republican-election-fraud.html

Not to mention:
https://www.propublica.org/article/...-fraud-meetings-with-state-election-officials
https://www.salon.com/2019/11/06/tw...io-election-fraud-scheme-but-they-won-anyway/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-north-carolina-idUSKCN1QG2FS

There's been no "havoc created by the Postmaster General with the postal service since May".

Then there's this: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...e-changes-began-way-before-Trump-was-sworn-in
Click to expand...

Gov. Steve Bullock on Tuesday sued the U.S. Postal Service and Postmaster General Louis DeJoy seeking to reverse “unlawful” changes made to Montana postal services ahead of the November election, including eliminating overtime pay and dismantling mail-sorting machines.

In July 26, DeJoy informed election officials in 46 states, including Montana, that the Postal Service couldn’t guarantee mail ballots would be delivered on time. Bullock’s lawsuit, filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Great Falls, asserts the postmaster general violated federal law by making the changes without the Postal Regulatory Commission’s approval.

https://billingsgazette.com/news/st...cle_51da7cb1-0e21-5a3e-8ed3-c5cb6eb22c14.html
 
Joe Hiden said:
Here is the ruling from the democrat run Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Current Pennsylvania law states clearly that all mail-in ballots are due by the time polls close on Election Day.



But the court's order adds a three-day extension to receive ballots that are postmarked by 8 p.m. on Election Day. Ballots with a preelection postmark will now be counted as long as they are received by 5 p.m. on Nov. 6, three days after the polls close.

The court also wrote that ballots “received within this period that lack a postmark or other proof of mailing, or for which the postmark or other proof of mailing is illegible, will be presumed to have been mailed by Election Day unless a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that it was mailed after Election Day.”

Now why would the court allow ballots that didn't have a proper post mark or other proof of mailing?


Can any JPP leftist give a coherent answer? It seems to be rife with fraud potential.

Of course this will make its way to the Supreme Court and will get thrown out because it violates Article 1 Section 4 of the US Constitution which states clearly that only the legislature can write election law. Clearly the Court is making election law.

If JPP democrats avoid this thread then it is clear that they know the whole point of this is to cheat
Click to expand...

Sounds like more judicial activism, and law writing. Probably stacked with leftist judges.

They will do anything to cheat and win. All they care about is power.
 
Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
The Pennsylvania Republican Party is pushing back against an explosive report earlier this week in The Atlantic that said the GOP-run legislature is already strategizing how to overturn the statewide results if Trump loses.
Click to expand...

odd, but that doesn't seem responsive to the question of why the PA SC issued a judgment so obviously contrary to law?......
 
Irish said:
Sounds like more judicial activism, and law writing. Probably stacked with leftist judges.

They will do anything to cheat and win. All they care about is power.
Click to expand...

iu
 
PostmodernProphet said:
odd, but that doesn't seem responsive to the question of why the PA SC issued a judgment so obviously contrary to law?......
Click to expand...

Obfuscation, misdirection, and deflection are her normal responses to questions she cannot answer, aren't they?

In their published conclusion, the partisan Court acknowledged their own hypocrisy, but used the Wu Flu as an excuse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top