Military 'Will Not Follow' Unlawful Trump Orders Over Election, House Armed Services

S

signalmankenneth

Verified User
This is nice to know, the orange buffoon may want to start a war when loses the election or use the military to attack protesters ect?!!

President Donald Trump will not command the loyalty of the military should he lose the election and try to co-opt them to back any challenge of the results, the chairman of the House Committee on Armed Services has said.

Trailing in the polls to his Democratic rival Joe Biden, Trump did not commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses on November 3, telling reporters "we're going to see what happens."

The president also again cast aspersions on the integrity of mail-in voting which, without evidence, he claims will lead to widespread fraud.

His opponents fear Trump is laying the groundwork for a challenge to the results that could involve the military. But Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) told CNN that defense leaders assured him they would not serve Trump after the inauguration on January 20 if he loses.

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-election-military-transfer-power-1534208
03Y74c_0WylOT7x00

 
Stop copying and pasting everything Cartoon Ken. You fucking racist. Obviously to fucking stupid to be able to put anything into your own words. Except something racist. You take the time for that.
 
Hello signalmankenneth,

signalmankenneth said:
This is nice to know, the orange buffoon may want to start a war when loses the election or use the military to attack protesters ect?!!

[FONT=&]President Donald Trump will not command the loyalty of the military should he lose the election and try to co-opt them to back any challenge of the results, the chairman of the House Committee on Armed Services has said.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Trailing in the polls to his Democratic rival Joe Biden, Trump did not commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses on November 3, telling reporters "we're going to see what happens."
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The president also again cast aspersions on the integrity of mail-in voting which, without evidence, he claims will lead to widespread fraud.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]His opponents fear Trump is laying the groundwork for a challenge to the results that could involve the military. But Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) told CNN that defense leaders assured him they would not serve Trump after the inauguration on January 20 if he loses.

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-election-military-transfer-power-1534208

[/FONT]
03Y74c_0WylOT7x00
[FONT=&]
[/FONT]
Click to expand...

He's just setting the stage so that if the in-person voting on election day shows him in the lead in some states, and then the tons mail-in ballots getting counted over the days afterward begin to show his lead evaporating, then he will say they have to shut down the count, and falsely claim without evidence that the ballots are fraudulent.

No.

What will be happening is there will be so many mail-in ballots it will take days or even weeks to count them all.

And Republicans have forced stupid pointless rules into the process which prevent any counting of ballots prior to election day.

If he tries to send the military to stop the vote counting, it is reassuring to know that they will refuse to follow that unlawful order.
 
Sailor said:
Stop copying and pasting everything Cartoon Ken. You fucking racist. Obviously to fucking stupid to be able to put anything into your own words. Except something racist. You take the time for that.
Click to expand...

My guess on people who never comment and only post links only post comments under a different username. The game would be figuring out which username. :)


Regardless, it's reassuring to hear the Republicans and our military stand by the Constitution, not some dumbass fuckwad who wants to play dictator.
 
signalmankenneth said:
This is nice to know, the orange buffoon may want to start a war when loses the election or use the military to attack protesters ect?!!

[FONT=&]President Donald Trump will not command the loyalty of the military should he lose the election and try to co-opt them to back any challenge of the results, the chairman of the House Committee on Armed Services has said.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Trailing in the polls to his Democratic rival Joe Biden, Trump did not commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he loses on November 3, telling reporters "we're going to see what happens."
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The president also again cast aspersions on the integrity of mail-in voting which, without evidence, he claims will lead to widespread fraud.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]His opponents fear Trump is laying the groundwork for a challenge to the results that could involve the military. But Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) told CNN that defense leaders assured him they would not serve Trump after the inauguration on January 20 if he loses.

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-election-military-transfer-power-1534208

[/FONT]
03Y74c_0WylOT7x00
[FONT=&]
[/FONT]
Click to expand...

BECAUSE THAT'S A POSSIBILITY.... :laugh:
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello signalmankenneth,



He's just setting the stage so that if the in-person voting on election day shows him in the lead in some states, and then the tons mail-in ballots getting counted over the days afterward begin to show his lead evaporating, then he will say they have to shut down the count, and falsely claim without evidence that the ballots are fraudulent.

No.

What will be happening is there will be so many mail-in ballots it will take days or even weeks to count them all.

And Republicans have forced stupid pointless rules into the process which prevent any counting of ballots prior to election day.

If he tries to send the military to stop the vote counting, it is reassuring to know that they will refuse to follow that unlawful order.
Click to expand...

Newsweek magazine does not get to speak for the military.
 
signalmankenneth said:
tenor.gif

[h=1]Mentally Retarded[/h]
Click to expand...

And you rush right in again to prove it you fucking racist. Seriously Ken, are you mentally retarded? Have a reason? A stroke maybe? Inbreeding? Or just some uneducated fuck who is to stupid to be able to communicate. It has to be one of them.
 
Into the Night said:
Newsweek magazine does not get to speak for the military.
Click to expand...

No one does, INT/IBDa/gfm7571, especially anyone who refused to serve.

Did you serve in the US military? I did. A handful of people on this forum did too, but I'm curious about you.

Did you try but couldn't pass the "physical"? Or did you bust a knee in bootcamp? Please let everyone on the forum know who you think speaks for the millions of Americans who took an oath to serve our country.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top