No I didn't, idiot.
.
LMAO Monte Python argument clinic sketch under way...
No I didn't, idiot.
.
Ah, so what we have here is a case of Schroedinger's Douchebag: One who makes douchebag statements, particularly sexist, racist or otherwise bigoted ones, then decides whether they were “just joking”, "being sarcastic", or dead serious based on the responses of other people.
No, Fox News is saying Tucker Carlson is full of shit...so the thread is about that.
You are functionally illiterate.
Home schooling. ^^^^
Damn country people are stupid.

No I didn't, idiot.
"Fox News tells court reasonable viewers know Tucker Carlson is full of shit."
See? Literally right there in the subject of the OP.
Thank you for that creative ad hominem even if the use of "Schrodinger's Douchebag" is improperly applied.
So wait- do people watch CNN or not?
Because it is literally the subject of the OP, you jackass.

In short the media may lie with impunity because the standard for malice is too onerous. You can recklessly call someone an extortionist,
and no firm takes more advantage of the right to lie to citizens US Free speech law affords as does Fox bullshit mountain.
Thank you for that creative ad hominem even if the use of "Schrodinger's Douchebag" is improperly applied.
This fake intellectualism you're leaning on now certainly isn't helping make your case.
Ah, so what we have here is a case of Schroedinger's Douchebag: One who makes douchebag statements, particularly sexist, racist or otherwise bigoted ones, then decides whether they were “just joking”, "being sarcastic", or dead serious based on the responses of other people.
This fake intellectualism you're leaning on now certainly isn't helping make your case.
Nor is his inability to admit he didn't read the OP so he made that silly mistake about "literal" and then like a rat terrier refuses
to let go of the sock even as you rap his snout with a newspaper repeatedly.
If I didn't know better I'd say it was Sailor, except more pleasant.
Was that sarcasm?
Susan McDougal's suit against Tucker Carlson was thrown out in part because of this.
Fox persuasively argues, see Def Br. at 13-15, that given Mr. Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer “arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism” about the statements he makes.
One does have to wonder if Fox News has any reasonable viewers based on how they all seem to believe everything Tucker says.
The quote from the court is found on page 12
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/7216968/9-24-20-McDougal-v-Fox-Opinion.pdf
I haven't been able to find the referenced Defense Brief to see how Fox framed the quote. If anyone finds it, post a link here.
Tucker Carlson is one of the most fact checked and proven liars and antagonists in the Republican, Propaganda, Fake News, and psychological warfare deep state brigade.
His only purpose in life is to instill hatred, confusion, and dirty lies, about his political opposites, while making exaggerations, wild unproven claims, and downright preposterous lies about Donald Trump and his presidency, Current Events, Science, the Constitution, and other rogue Republicans that repeat all the same lies and rhetoric he fosters on his hourly propaganda hour on FOX NEWS!
It should be against the law to call Fox News- Fox NEWS! Because it should be called FAKE NEWS or FOX LIES or something more accurate.
Fox News is just another irresponsible and reckless Communication Center for the new REPUBLICAN HATRED CULT that has swept across America much like the Corona Virus!
Well, I am 100% convinced that nearly every Conservative on JPP has multiple socks that they switch between to astroturf support.
I forgive him the occasional over-reach, considering the piles of fake news disguised as "journalism"
by the Biden Press.. He's been really good on covering the riots as well, barely mentioned by the Biden Press
Tucker is the only person who has on non-Russiaphobes like Steven Cohen, and the Nation's Katrina vanden Heuvel
Those are important to show Cold War 2.0 is not a given