At Least 1 Dead in Shooting at Texas Church

domer76 said:
You got your ass handed to you, loser. Quit while you’re only a little behind.
Click to expand...
More of your childish name-calling because you can't produce an intelligent argument.


Penderyn said:
Jesus wept! This is the hammered old anvil, that never uttered a word of sense yet!
Click to expand...
You can always recognize people who either support fascism or oppose civil liberties (or both) from their appeals to reason or common sense.
 
Anvil Kasseri said:
You engage in childish name-calling because you're incapable of making an intelligent argument.



Don't be silly. All you did was spout childish name-calling.
Click to expand...

:lolup:

Kicked your ignorant ass. No surprise though. You use the same failed responses as other ignorant RWers
 
domer76 said:
Kicked your ignorant ass.
Click to expand...
Hardly. All you did was spout childish name-calling.

And I'm not the one whose lack of knowledge forced him to resort to childish name-calling. You and that other name-caller are the only people here who don't know what you are talking about.


domer76 said:
No surprise though. You use the same failed responses as other ignorant RWers
Click to expand...
Pointing out facts and reality and proving you wrong is hardly a failure.


Penderyn said:
Please give me an example of an intelligent argument, kiddiewinkie.
Click to expand...
The only childish people here are you name-callers.

An example of an intelligent argument is one that presents facts and/or logic instead of relying on childish name-calling.


CharacterAssassin said:
It wasn't self-defense, you silly whore.
Click to expand...
That is incorrect. When people shoot someone who is trying to murder them, that is self defense.

Pointing out facts that you dislike hardly makes me a whore.
 
Anvil Kasseri said:
Hardly. All you did was spout childish name-calling.

And I'm not the one whose lack of knowledge forced him to resort to childish name-calling. You and that other name-caller are the only people here who don't know what you are talking about.



Pointing out facts and reality and proving you wrong is hardly a failure.



The only childish people here are you name-callers.

An example of an intelligent argument is one that presents facts and/or logic instead of relying on childish name-calling.



That is incorrect. When people shoot someone who is trying to murder them, that is self defense.

Pointing out facts that you dislike hardly makes me a whore.
Click to expand...

You have yet to point out a single fact. Merely the same laughable crap your fellow RW lemmings vomit.
 
Anvil Kasseri said:
Hardly. All you did was spout childish name-calling.

And I'm not the one whose lack of knowledge forced him to resort to childish name-calling. You and that other name-caller are the only people here who don't know what you are talking about.



Pointing out facts and reality and proving you wrong is hardly a failure.



The only childish people here are you name-callers.

An example of an intelligent argument is one that presents facts and/or logic instead of relying on childish name-calling.



That is incorrect. When people shoot someone who is trying to murder them, that is self defense.

Pointing out facts that you dislike hardly makes me a whore.
Click to expand...

It wasn't self-defense, silly whore.
 
volsrock said:
One person was killed and two others were critically wounded in a shooting at a Texas church, according to local media reports.

The incident happened around 11:30 a.m. at the West Freeway Church of Christ in White Settlement, a suburb of Fort Worth.

A witness told CBS 11 News the assailant walked up to someone serving communion and shot them—and another church member shot the gunman.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/deadl...ch-of-christ-in-white-settlement-texas-report

and another church member shot the gunman

and another church member shot the gunman

and another church member shot the gunman


Mass killing stopped in the tracks. No armed church members, we would be looking at another Sutherland Springs


Amazing how someone with a gun stopped the shooter in one second and the shooter was stopped from killing more!
Click to expand...

30,000-40,000 gun deaths every year. Year in. Year out.
 
domer76 said:
You have yet to point out a single fact.
Click to expand...
Here is a selection of some of the facts that I've posted in this thread:

"Non-militiamen have the right to have weapons strong enough to be suitable for private self defense."

"[The government] cannot make restrictions [on a fundamental right] that cannot be justified as serving a compelling government interest."

"Self defense is not in any way murder."

"North Korea has [nuclear missiles]. They are outlaws."

"Preventing people from buying more guns would be unconstitutional."

"The Second Amendment protects people's right to have guns for private self defense (among other things)."

"We have the right to own guns whether you like it or not."

"Gun availability has little impact on homicide rates."

"Auto ownership is directly correlated to car accident deaths."

"People have the right to carry guns for self defense if they so choose."

"The term 'well regulated militia' means that the militia in question has trained well enough that they can fight as a single coherent unit instead of fighting as a bunch of random individuals."

"People cannot justify restricting pistol grips on semi-auto long guns as serving a compelling government interest."

"The fact that part of the right to keep and bear arms involves the militia does not change the fact that it also protects the right of non-militiamen to have guns for private self defense."

"The right of self defense is the cornerstone of all lawful government."

"All free people have an inherent right to carry weapons for private self defense."

"outlawing guns would save very few lives."

"Assault weapons have been highly restricted for some 85 years now. Neither of the groups that you named have ready access to such weapons."

"Making it difficult for people to exercise their rights is unconstitutional."

"All Americans have the right to have weapons that are suitable for self defense. This includes guns."

"Militias are not the only basis for gun possession. People have the right to have guns for private self defense."


domer76 said:
Merely the same laughable crap your fellow RW lemmings vomit.
Click to expand...
I do not agree that facts and reality are laughable crap.


domer76 said:
30,000-40,000 gun deaths every year. Year in. Year out.
Click to expand...
So what? They'd be just as dead if they were killed with a different weapon.


Penderyn said:
That is not an example, child - just an irrelevant statement.
Click to expand...
You engage in childish name-calling because you lack the ability to make an intelligent argument.


CharacterAssassin said:
It wasn't self-defense,
Click to expand...
Wrong again. When people protect themselves from someone who is trying to murder them, that is self defense.


CharacterAssassin said:
silly whore.
Click to expand...
You engage in childish name-calling because you lack the ability to make an intelligent argument.
 
Anvil Kasseri said:
Here is a selection of some of the facts that I've posted in this thread:

"Non-militiamen have the right to have weapons strong enough to be suitable for private self defense."

"[The government] cannot make restrictions [on a fundamental right] that cannot be justified as serving a compelling government interest."

"Self defense is not in any way murder."

"North Korea has [nuclear missiles]. They are outlaws."

"Preventing people from buying more guns would be unconstitutional."

"The Second Amendment protects people's right to have guns for private self defense (among other things)."

"We have the right to own guns whether you like it or not."

"Gun availability has little impact on homicide rates."

"Auto ownership is directly correlated to car accident deaths."

"People have the right to carry guns for self defense if they so choose."

"The term 'well regulated militia' means that the militia in question has trained well enough that they can fight as a single coherent unit instead of fighting as a bunch of random individuals."

"People cannot justify restricting pistol grips on semi-auto long guns as serving a compelling government interest."

"The fact that part of the right to keep and bear arms involves the militia does not change the fact that it also protects the right of non-militiamen to have guns for private self defense."

"The right of self defense is the cornerstone of all lawful government."

"All free people have an inherent right to carry weapons for private self defense."

"outlawing guns would save very few lives."

"Assault weapons have been highly restricted for some 85 years now. Neither of the groups that you named have ready access to such weapons."

"Making it difficult for people to exercise their rights is unconstitutional."

"All Americans have the right to have weapons that are suitable for self defense. This includes guns."

"Militias are not the only basis for gun possession. People have the right to have guns for private self defense."



I do not agree that facts and reality are laughable crap.



So what? They'd be just as dead if they were killed with a different weapon.



You engage in childish name-calling because you lack the ability to make an intelligent argument.



Wrong again. When people protect themselves from someone who is trying to murder them, that is self defense.



You engage in childish name-calling because you lack the ability to make an intelligent argument.
Click to expand...

Same laughable bullshit.

The government can, and does, regulate the who, what and where guns can be had. Whether you like it or not. People CAN be prevented from purchasing more guns. It happens every day and it’s constitutional.

The lame attempt to compare vehicle deaths to gun deaths has been dealt with uncountable times. It was lame the first time. It still is.

There is no inherent right to own guns. Only a codified one. And it has limitations.

Outlawing guns in other countries reduces gun death rates to a much lower level that the sky high US gun death rate.

One more time, gun restrictions ARE constitutional and have been ruled on numerous times. Whether you like it or not.

30,000-40,000 WEREN’T killed with another weapon, idiot. They were killed with guns. Stop trying to invent your own reality to make a weak point. Deal with ACTUAL reality.

Those are the CORRECT responses to your bullshit.
 
Anvil Kasseri said:
Here is a selection of some of the facts that I've posted in this thread:

"Non-militiamen have the right to have weapons strong enough to be suitable for private self defense."

"[The government] cannot make restrictions [on a fundamental right] that cannot be justified as serving a compelling government interest."

"Self defense is not in any way murder."

"North Korea has [nuclear missiles]. They are outlaws."

"Preventing people from buying more guns would be unconstitutional."

"The Second Amendment protects people's right to have guns for private self defense (among other things)."

"We have the right to own guns whether you like it or not."

"Gun availability has little impact on homicide rates."

"Auto ownership is directly correlated to car accident deaths."

"People have the right to carry guns for self defense if they so choose."

"The term 'well regulated militia' means that the militia in question has trained well enough that they can fight as a single coherent unit instead of fighting as a bunch of random individuals."

"People cannot justify restricting pistol grips on semi-auto long guns as serving a compelling government interest."

"The fact that part of the right to keep and bear arms involves the militia does not change the fact that it also protects the right of non-militiamen to have guns for private self defense."

"The right of self defense is the cornerstone of all lawful government."

"All free people have an inherent right to carry weapons for private self defense."

"outlawing guns would save very few lives."

"Assault weapons have been highly restricted for some 85 years now. Neither of the groups that you named have ready access to such weapons."

"Making it difficult for people to exercise their rights is unconstitutional."

"All Americans have the right to have weapons that are suitable for self defense. This includes guns."

"Militias are not the only basis for gun possession. People have the right to have guns for private self defense."



I do not agree that facts and reality are laughable crap.



So what? They'd be just as dead if they were killed with a different weapon.



You engage in childish name-calling because you lack the ability to make an intelligent argument.



Wrong again. When people protect themselves from someone who is trying to murder them, that is self defense.



You engage in childish name-calling because you lack the ability to make an intelligent argument.
Click to expand...

Thanks for admitting it wasn't self-defense, silly whore.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top