Using common sense, what is the difference between cooperation and collusion?

archives said:
The “he didn’t break the law” is old, and was always lame, an abortion doctor doesn’t break any law, so I guess that means you are alright with his action also

Never said any law was broken, rather pointing out the hypocrisy, for the right, some standards apply to others, but not themselves

And the point is given the evidence, few Americans believe the “no collusion” bullshit, common sense reigns, Trump is guilty as hell, if his “cooperation” ain’t collusion Louie Gohmert is a Rhodes Scholar
Click to expand...

you lose
 
That said, there are unresolved matters that Mueller’s testimony could help clarify. Mueller claimed to have established that the Russian government conducted “a sweeping and systematic” interference campaign in order to elect Trump, yet the contents of his report don’t support that allegation.
The Mueller report repeatedly excludes countervailing information in order to suggest, misleadingly, that the Trump campaign had suspect “links” and “ties” to people connected with Russia. And Mueller and other intelligence officials involved in the Russia probe made questionable investigative decisions that are worthy of scrutiny.
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/questions-mueller-russiagate/
 
Concart said:
I think the element that was missing in the Mueller report is the third 'C'. Coordination. They couldn't find evidence of a coordinated effort, just Trump 'suggesting' things in the press, the Russians responding, and Trump using the information he got. Is this unethical, antithetic to our free election system, and bad for the country? Of course. Should he have been impeached and removed from office for this? IMHO yes. But is it a crime? I'll leave that to smarter legal minds, but the bottom line is that this isn't a binary question. Russia interfered. Trump suggested in public that they SHOULD interfere, and had advance knowledge of Russian actions. How the Trumptards can defend that is beyond me.
Click to expand...

 
archives said:
Mueller dropped the ball, either he was in over his head, or, Rosenstein was more involved than thought. Watching Mueller’s testimony it became apparent he was too focused on presenting himself as a non involved entity even though the evidence was overwhelming. It allowed billy barr and the right wing media to frame the reports conclusions
Click to expand...
Mueller was befuddled. end of story. Weissman did the Mueller report. get up to speed
 
anatta said:
Mueller was befuddled. end of story. Weissman did the Mueller report. get up to speed
Click to expand...

They all were appointed and overseen by Trump appointees, Rosenstein stood on that podium right behind billy barr when he framed the conclusions, almost as if it was scripted from the offset, with Mueller the appointed fall guy, he was lost
 
archives said:
They all were appointed and overseen by Trump appointees, Rosenstein stood on that podium right behind billy barr when he framed the conclusions, almost as if it was scripted from the offset, with Mueller the appointed fall guy, he was lost
Click to expand...
quit worrying abut Barr. read Mueller.
Read my link as to why Muellers works was sloppy and unattributed "Russian sources"
or the Internet Research Agency was a Russian gov't op. it's all lies and hearsay without factual attribution
 
Concart said:
Did you have something that responds to what I wrote, or are we just posting youtube videos for shits and giggles?
Click to expand...

That’s one of the standards employed by Trumpkins, like “he didn’t break any laws did he,” Holder say “I’m his wingman,” and Biden explaining how he got the Ukrainian AG fired, all been explained and debunked umpteen times, matters little, see them often
 
anatta said:
That said, there are unresolved matters that Mueller’s testimony could help clarify. Mueller claimed to have established that the Russian government conducted “a sweeping and systematic” interference campaign in order to elect Trump, yet the contents of his report don’t support that allegation.
The Mueller report repeatedly excludes countervailing information in order to suggest, misleadingly, that the Trump campaign had suspect “links” and “ties” to people connected with Russia. And Mueller and other intelligence officials involved in the Russia probe made questionable investigative decisions that are worthy of scrutiny.
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/questions-mueller-russiagate/
Click to expand...

You must be kidding.
A year old opinion article does not refute findings just released now, such as the fact that. Trump lied to Mueller.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top