Into the Night
Verified User
False accusation fallacy.
Mockery. Denial of logic.
False accusation fallacy.
Mockery. Denial of logic.
Meh. Most colleges don't teach philosophy anymore.
Meh. Most colleges don't teach philosophy anymore.
They do. My god, you're just full of shit.
Meh. Most colleges don't teach philosophy anymore.
"Totally uneducated annoying loser posing as a philosopher fallacy."![]()
False accusation fallacy.
They do. My god, you're just full of shit.
Hasty generalization fallacy.
Mockery. Denial of logic.
Full of shit fallacy!
No, they don't. They teach a smattering of phenomenology at best and call that 'philosophy'.
No, they don't. They teach a smattering of phenomenology at best and call that 'philosophy'.
Evidence of that?
We agree. All of these sources of their philosophies were solely themselves. You seem to be trying to show a disagreement using a semantics fallacy.The only source in a philosophical argument is yourself.
sources of philosophical arguments: Kant, Aristotle, Descartes, Socrates, Plato, Rousseau, Jesus, Engles.....
False authority fallacy. Philosophy is not a book.There is no such thing as 'philosophy of history', 'philosophy of science', etc. There is just philosophy, or there is not.
Voltaire, La philosophie de l'histoire, Changuion, 1765.
False authority fallacy.History is past events. There is no philosophy about it.
Voltaire, La philosophie de l'histoire, Changuion, 1765.
Science is a set of falsifiable theories. There is no philosophy about it.
Epistemologists study the nature of knowledge, epistemic justification, the rationality of belief, and various related issues. Epistemology is considered one of the four main branches of philosophy,
Not science.along with ethics,
Logic is not philosophy. It is a closed functional system like mathematics.logic,
Not science.and metaphysics.
Science is not a 'foundation'. It is not a 'method' or 'procedure'. There is no 'philosophy of science'. The philosophical arguments discussing the implication of science is just philosophy.Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy concerned with the foundations, methods, and implications of science.
Science is just a set of falsifiable theories. If a theory is falsifiable, it is a theory of science until it is falsified. it is never proven True. No theory of any kind, scientific or otherwise, is ever proven True.The central questions of this study concern what qualifies as science,
There is no 'reliability' of any theory. The theory simply exists.the reliability of scientific theories,
It has no specific purpose. Reversal fallacy.and the ultimate purpose of science.
Science is not philosophy.This discipline overlaps with metaphysics, ontology, and epistemology,
Religion is some initial circular argument with arguments extending from that. There is no philosophy about it.
Philosophy of Religion is rational thought about religious issues and concerns without a presumption of the existence of a deity or reliance on acts of faith.
The nature of all religions is that they based on a an initial circular argument, with arguments extending from that.Philosophers examine the nature of religion and religious beliefs.
Some of these are philosophy, others are not.There is just philosophy"
Ontology, teleology, cosmology, phenomenology, rationalism, historicism, ethics, aesthetics
Inversion fallacy."Totally uneducated annoying loser posing as a philosopher fallacy."![]()
I know....the trend is towards classes like "Establishing Safe Zones" and "The Physics of Safe Statue Tipping"........
False accusation fallacy.