Saddam is Back: Maliki's Secret Crackdown

blackascoal

The Force is With Me
The story of the sweeping, and secretive, arrests, in Iraq's national security apparatus is getting curiouser and curiouser. It now appears as if the whole thing was a clumsy effort by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to get rid of political opponents, in advance of January elections.

Iraq's provincial elections take place 11 days after Barack Obama becomes president next month, and they could present him with his first international crisis. In several key provinces -- Nineveh, Baghdad, and Diyala -- the ruling alliance may face crushing electoral defeats, and Prime Minister Maliki is apparently trying to preempt that by force. But it's looking more and more likely that the elections in Iraq will be rigged, and that could touch off violence. The secret arrests are just the tip of the iceberg.

Reported the Post:

Members of parliament charged Thursday that the prime minister was using Iraq's security forces to instill fear in his rivals ahead of provincial elections set for next month. Critics noted pointedly that a special counterterrorism task force that reports to Maliki made the arrests.

Maliki, whose ruling Dawa party has split and split again -- former Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari, who was a Dawa member, is now running an opposition party -- is doing everything he can to bolster his party's power before the January 31 vote. Not much of it is democratic. He's building ties to the army command to make the Iraqi armed forces loyal to him personally. He's creating thuggish provincial "support councils" around the country as a kind of private militia. And he's using a special ops force, which reports directly to the prime minister, as a strike force against his enemies and opponents. They've been used in Diyala province, northeast of Baghdad, in an attempt to crush the Sunni-led Awakening movement there. And, it seems, it was this force that Maliki used to arrest two dozen or more supposed plotters in the Interior Ministry and perhaps elsewhere, including the Defense Ministry.

The Los Angeles Times reported that Maliki's arrests "raised concerns that the government's crackdown was reminiscent of Hussein's regime." It added:

Some legislators compared the government's behavior to that of Hussein's regime. Hussein's security apparatus had often rounded up political opponents on dubious charges. The lawmakers raised concern that the arrests were linked to the Shiite-led government's efforts to consolidate power.

Some Shiite, Sunni Arab and Kurdish lawmakers have accused Maliki recently of harboring authoritarian ambitions, in a break from the power-sharing model championed by U.S. officials since 2003.

No good explanation for the arrests has been provided by the government, which leaked two days ago that the supposed plotters were planning a coup d'etat and that they were associated with Iraq's Baath Party, through an organization called The Return (Al Awda). But according to many others, the entire Maliki-led operations was conducted without informing Iraq's own government, the ministers involved (including the minister of defense), and the parliament. The interior minister, Jawad al-Bolani, who is creating his own political party to compete against the ruling alliance, wasn't informed, either.

Sunnis were outraged by the secretive arrests, since many of those arrested appear to have been Sunnis. Allies of Muqtada al-Sadr condemned the arrests. And even spokesmen for the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI), an Iranian-allied party with a powerful militia, voiced suspicion about the arrests. ISCI controls the Interior Ministry, and ISCI is competing in the election across the Shiite south of Iraq against Maliki's Dawa.

The New York Times, which broke the story Thursday -- but with important details wrong -- reported in an update today that there "was no evidence that the suspects were in the early stages of planning a coup" against Maliki. Added the Times:

[An] adviser to Mr. Bolani said that the prime minister had been privately pushing for the arrest of a number of Interior officials for two months, but that Mr. Bolani had pushed back, insisting that the officials were innocent.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/dreyfuss/391049/maliki_s_secret_crackdown?rel=hp_picks

Guess Obama will have to go an re-invade Iraq for "freedom"
 
Well I think me an many ohters have been saying this for years.

Take out Sadam and you will end up with a brand new cork in the bottle.

Yeah Sadam was shit but a shit cork is better than no cork at all.
 
Well I think me an many ohters have been saying this for years.

Take out Sadam and you will end up with a brand new cork in the bottle.

Yeah Sadam was shit but a shit cork is better than no cork at all.

The socio-ethnic-political dynamics in Iraq requires a strongman to keep the country from exploding .. a strongman just like Saddam ..

What happens when/if the Maliki government is ousted and Iraq moves even closer to Iran?

What will the Mindfuck Master do?

Answer: whatever Israel wants him to do.
 
I think not, It also remains to be seen.

Barack Obama is the first Jewish president of the United States.

They OWN him .. look no further than his foreign policy for truth.

Of course, you could just look at nearly everybody around him for this truth as well.

They OWN him .. and they always have.
 
it is still a young government, give it time. the american government was not perfect at first either, nor is it now. also, some of the information may not be true.
 
The socio-ethnic-political dynamics in Iraq requires a strongman to keep the country from exploding .. a strongman just like Saddam ..

What happens when/if the Maliki government is ousted and Iraq moves even closer to Iran?

What will the Mindfuck Master do?

Answer: whatever Israel wants him to do.

Certainly, the minute we took away the sunni strongman, Saddam, and replaced him with a "democracy" in Iraq... it becomes only a matter of time before the majority shiites align themselves with their neighbors and spiritual brothers in Iran...

and Obama will do whatever is in our national interest when that happens...

if that also happens to be in Israel's national interest, that is fine with me.
 
it is still a young government, give it time. the american government was not perfect at first either, nor is it now. also, some of the information may not be true.
the american government was not created by external forces... America was not "given" our liberty or our form of government by some benevolent conquerer.
 
Certainly, the minute we took away the sunni strongman, Saddam, and replaced him with a "democracy" in Iraq... it becomes only a matter of time before the majority shiites align themselves with their neighbors and spiritual brothers in Iran...

and Obama will do whatever is in our national interest when that happens...

if that also happens to be in Israel's national interest, that is fine with me.

Actually, I was speaking for me, not you.

... and Obama will do what Israel tells him to do.

If you don't know that, that's fine too.
 
Actually, I was speaking for me, not you.

... and Obama will do what Israel tells him to do.

If you don't know that, that's fine too.


I don't "KNOW" it and certainly you don't either.

YOu can spout opinions all day long...we all do... just don't try to dress 'em up and trot them out as facts.
 
I don't "KNOW" it and certainly you don't either.

YOu can spout opinions all day long...we all do... just don't try to dress 'em up and trot them out as facts.

:cof1:

2008-11-14-ObamaYarm.jpg


The good news is that I don't have to account for what you don't know.

Perhaps 35% of his administration comes from less than 2% of the population.

You can call that whatever you choose.
 
:cof1:

2008-11-14-ObamaYarm.jpg


The good news is that I don't have to account for what you don't know.

Perhaps 35% of his administration comes from less than 2% of the population.

You can call that whatever you choose.

so an american politician who puts on a yarmulke to go to the western wall is automatically in Israel's pocket? what else ya got besides a photo and your own opinion?

and I'd call your presumption that American citizens who happen to be Jewish would somehow have allegiance to Israel as bigoted and disgusting an opinion as those who earlier said that JFK would have allegiance to the pope.
 
Last edited:
so an american politician who puts on a yarmulke to go to the western wall is automatically in Israel's pocket? what else ya got besides a photo and your own opinion?

and I'd call your presumption that American citizens who happen to be Jewish would somehow have allegiance to Israel as bigoted and disgusting an opinion as those who earlier said that JFK would have allegiance to the pope.
There's that photo of him dressed up with a turban on...

He must be in the Palestinians pocket too.
 
Back
Top