Cancel 2020.2
Canceled
Political statues are not history, just bad art. Get the American army to destroy them, as they did in Iraq.

Political statues are not history, just bad art. Get the American army to destroy them, as they did in Iraq.

By the 1860s there was an international consensus that slavery was wrong. Chattel slavery was illegal almost everywhere in the western world by the 1860s except in the American South.
Everyone had read, or was aware of Uncle Tom's cabin, in the 1860s and was aware of the immorality of slavery.
By the 1860s the excuses to defend slavery had run out, and by the 1860s it was time to make this choice:
For chattel slavery?
Or against it?
Robert E Lee decided in the 1860s that chattel slavery was worth committing treason and killing American soldiers over

It must really bother people who are too insecure, that they are no longer “special”, and that they’re no better than anyone else.
Sorry you’ve been living a lie and an illusion.
It’s morning ... Wake The Fuck You, and try having some coffee
![]()

Lee fought to preserve the horrors of slavery and LOST.
If I'm not mistaken, the OP impled that this represents "American exceptionalism."

Did Donald Trump tell you to say that?
Hilarious! You are one serious hateful bastard!

Here Earl!
Here is a statue of your president! Hope it makes you feel better!
![]()

Statues of Pigdog have been demolished everywhere, so I understand.

Well we no longer teach History or Civics in most schools. Leftists edit Wikipedia to their liking and alter digital history. Big tech companies are starting to invent ways to silence any decent. Book burning will be next.
This is just a start.
Even the autocratic and totalitarian Russian tsar freed the serfs in 1861.
And as bad as serfdom was, it did not really even approach the cruelty and inhumanity of the chattel slavery system Robert E Lee continued to fight defending

The only thing exceptional about you is how wrong you end up being on everything you say.
Where's that 3% growth?

They want their participation trophies and are throwing a fit because they can't have them.

Trump's vision of a racist America is over. He is a fascist. Trump is the past.

legit question.
it exposes the person ( usuallyin their glory) to the masses, or in some cases memorializes a particular event.
I dont know about you, but I lived in Maryland as a kid, ( a civil war buffer state)
and there were battlefields all around.
I got interested in the battles, and then wanted to know about the men as a measure to understand that chaotic time
the men ( and few women) drove the events with even their personalities at time..it like a public biography for those interested
no you don't "need it" it sparks interest as ive laid outSo, you needed a statue to inspire that. None of countless movies, classes, books, etc. gave you the impetus to research further. Got it.
Did you know that a lot of the confederate statues were erected after the war, by those whose intent was to still find some way to assert white supremacy?
True story. Statues aren't teaching devices. Read a book. Take a class, Go online.
no you don't "need it" it sparks interest as ive laid out
but look at your ignorance, as you jump to "white supremacy" as the reason for the monuments -such inexact claptrap
Slavery was an economic issue for the south; why it started and why it was fought for
Im familiar with the timeline, many were erected at 50 o r 25 year anniverasary increments