Ocean currents powering the world?

So let me get this straight...

A BRAND NEW technology, developed by the US government at the University of Michigan has already died because YOU proclaim it?

There is nothing in your article that suggests this idea is dead or that it cannot be developed in an economically viable way.
 
So let me get this straight...

A BRAND NEW technology, developed by the US government at the University of Michigan has already died because YOU proclaim it?

There is nothing in your article that suggests this idea is dead or that it cannot be developed in an economically viable way.

Why not? A President who hasn't even taken office yet, has given us four years of center/right failure, according to you and bac.
 
In order to power the world, wouldn't there have to be a very large number of these devices out there?

And wouldn't places a very large number of the devices in the current change the flow of the current?

Changing the flow of the ocean's current could have disastorous results.
 
In order to power the world, wouldn't there have to be a very large number of these devices out there?

And wouldn't places a very large number of the devices in the current change the flow of the current?

Changing the flow of the ocean's current could have disastorous results.

thats one of the worries with blue energy. the impact to current and marine life

There is also a concern with wind about the environmental impacts and even the changing of wind patterns.


Solars is the only one with no negative effects.
 
Why not? A President who hasn't even taken office yet, has given us four years of center/right failure, according to you and bac.

LOL... where did I say Obama has given us a four years of failure. I think you all have been opposed to my positions so long, you can't see that I am beginning to respect Obama MORE.... not less.
 
In order to power the world, wouldn't there have to be a very large number of these devices out there?

And wouldn't places a very large number of the devices in the current change the flow of the current?

Changing the flow of the ocean's current could have disastorous results.



"vortex-induced vibrations for aquatic clean energy".

Michael Bernitsas, a professor of naval architecture at the university, said it was based on the changes in water speed that are caused when a current flows past an obstruction. Eddies or vortices, formed in the water flow, can move objects up and down or left and right.

"This is a totally new method of extracting energy from water flow," said Mr Bernitsas. "Fish curve their bodies to glide between the vortices shed by the bodies of the fish in front of them. Their muscle power alone could not propel them through the water at the speed they go, so they ride in each other's wake."

Such vibrations, which were first observed 500 years ago by Leonardo DaVinci in the form of "Aeolian Tones", can cause damage to structures built in water, like docks and oil rigs. But Mr Bernitsas added: "We enhance the vibrations and harness this powerful and destructive force in nature.

"If we could harness 0.1 per cent of the energy in the ocean, we could support the energy needs of 15 billion people. In the English Channel, for example, there is a very strong current, so you produce a lot of power."

Because the parts only oscillate slowly, the technology is likely to be less harmful to aquatic wildlife than dams or water turbines. And as the installations can be positioned far below the surface of the sea, there would be less interference with shipping, recreational boat users, fishing and tourism.

The engineers are now deploying a prototype device in the Detroit River, which has a flow of less than two knots. Their work, funded by the US Department of Energy and the US Office of Naval Research, is published in the current issue of the quarterly Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering.
 
"vortex-induced vibrations for aquatic clean energy".

Michael Bernitsas, a professor of naval architecture at the university, said it was based on the changes in water speed that are caused when a current flows past an obstruction. Eddies or vortices, formed in the water flow, can move objects up and down or left and right.

"This is a totally new method of extracting energy from water flow," said Mr Bernitsas. "Fish curve their bodies to glide between the vortices shed by the bodies of the fish in front of them. Their muscle power alone could not propel them through the water at the speed they go, so they ride in each other's wake."

Such vibrations, which were first observed 500 years ago by Leonardo DaVinci in the form of "Aeolian Tones", can cause damage to structures built in water, like docks and oil rigs. But Mr Bernitsas added: "We enhance the vibrations and harness this powerful and destructive force in nature.

"If we could harness 0.1 per cent of the energy in the ocean, we could support the energy needs of 15 billion people. In the English Channel, for example, there is a very strong current, so you produce a lot of power."

Because the parts only oscillate slowly, the technology is likely to be less harmful to aquatic wildlife than dams or water turbines. And as the installations can be positioned far below the surface of the sea, there would be less interference with shipping, recreational boat users, fishing and tourism.

The engineers are now deploying a prototype device in the Detroit River, which has a flow of less than two knots. Their work, funded by the US Department of Energy and the US Office of Naval Research, is published in the current issue of the quarterly Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering.

But anything placed in the current will interfere with the flow. Multiply that by the number of units deployed, and I could see a change in the currents.
 
one of the problems with this approach is the native life forms in the water attaching themselves to the equipment or corrosion of the equipment

it may not be the initial cost but the up keep

oth, there are places where the tidal bore is enormous - tides in excess of 3 meters can be 'harvested'

[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_bore[/ame]
 
"If we could harness 0.1 per cent of the energy in the ocean, we could support the energy needs of 15 billion people."


It sounds like it may not be all that intrusive at that rate.
 
Back
Top