Brennan Suppressed Intel Showing Russia Favored Clinton

LV426 said:
So you get your news from someone who isn't a journalist.
Click to expand...

I get my news from many sources mostly primary sources, you get your talking points from the DNC ministry of propaganda from far left activists so dishonest they claim to be journalists with a straight face
 
LV426 said:
But he didn't conduct it... .
Click to expand...

He is the head of Crowdstrike so not only would he know the details of the investigation he did in fact conduct the forensic investigation of the DNC server upon which the DNI assessment was based: "Henry personally led the remediation and forensics analysis of the DNC server after being warned of a breach in late April 2016...".
God you're fucking dumb.


and he didn't say it wasn't hacked.
Click to expand...

I never claimed that it wasn't hacked I said he said there was no conclusive evidence that it was the Russians you illiterate fuck.
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
You know you and Legion can open up a thread and ban all the people who post the facts, by banning them from your threads.

In other words, if you can't handle the truth, facts, or reality- BAN IT!

We refer to this as Circle-Jerk threads, so be prepared to be the pivot man if you start one!
Click to expand...

A CCP propagandist railing against censorship. Don't that beat all!
 
StoneByStone said:
First of all, what does them being hookers have to do with anything?

Secondly, just because you're an NPC for a party, doesn't mean I am. I despise both the DNC and the RNC.
Click to expand...

You're a leftist hack for the DNC and you aren't fooling anyone, show me a single post where you have been critical of a DNC nominee, I'll wait.
 
Decisions, decisions. Do I believe all of the Intelligence agencies and the Senate Intelligence Committee, or do I believe some anonymous moron on a message board? I'm just so torn.

Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help elect Trump. Part of that effort was hacking the DNC server and stealing emails. All of the evidence suggests that. Only a moron would keep this idiotic conspiracy theory alive. Fortunately for us here at JPP, there is no shortage of morons advancing conspiracy theories that make no sense.
 
Concart said:
Decisions, decisions. Do I believe all of the Intelligence agencies and the Senate Intelligence Committee, or do I believe some anonymous moron on a message board? I'm just so torn.
Click to expand...

We have the declassified documents that proves the Obama DNI report was a lie and intentionally falsified by the coup plotter Brennan.

Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help elect Trump. Part of that effort was hacking the DNC server and stealing emails. All of the evidence suggests that. Only a moron would keep this idiotic conspiracy theory alive. Fortunately for us here at JPP, there is no shortage of morons advancing conspiracy theories that make no sense.
Click to expand...

That's interesting considering that the head of Crowdstrike who conducted the forensic analysis of the DNC servers upon which the entire DNI report was based admitted under oath that he doesn't even have conclusive evidence that it was the Russians who hacked the servers:

"There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left."
"There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There's circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated."
"There is circumstantial evidence that that data was exfiltrated off the network. … We didn't have a sensor in place that saw data leave. We said that the data left based on the circumstantial evidence. That was the conclusion that we made."
"Sir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didn't see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw."
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."

https://www.realclearinvestigations...d_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html
 
FreeSpeech said:
That's interesting considering that the head of Crowdstrike who conducted the forensic analysis of the DNC servers upon which the entire DNI report was based admitted under oath that he doesn't even have conclusive evidence that it was the Russians who hacked the servers:

"There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left."
"There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There's circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated."
"There is circumstantial evidence that that data was exfiltrated off the network. … We didn't have a sensor in place that saw data leave. We said that the data left based on the circumstantial evidence. That was the conclusion that we made."
"Sir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didn't see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw."
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."

https://www.realclearinvestigations...d_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html
Click to expand...

do you happen to know/recall the actual source docs on this?
They are called "DNI docs" because they were released by Richard Grenell - but what was the actual source?
WAs it Intelligence committee testimony?
 
anatta said:
do you happen to know/recall the actual source docs on this?
They are called "DNI docs" because they were released by Richard Grenell - but what was the actual source?
WAs it Intelligence committee testimony?
Click to expand...

The verbatim quotes I just posted were from newly released declassified testimony from Crowdstrike head Shawn Henry which is (I think) separate from but related to the Brennan revelations declassified by Grenell referred to in the OP.

The documents showing Brennan suppressed intel were declassified by Grenell but to be honest I'm not sure if they've been released or whether it will require an FOIA request to obtain them, I'll check judicial watch for any news on that front.

I think what we know of them thus far comes from reporting not from the primary source documents themselves so I'm not sure if it comes from declassified and redacted testimony or Intel reports.

Furthermore; the DNI report I'm referring to is the one from the Obama era investigation conducted by Crowdstrike for the intel community which concluded with "high confidence," that the Russians hacked the DNC server to aid Trump.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top